• Complain

Gillian McIver - Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling

Here you can read online Gillian McIver - Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Gillian McIver Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling
  • Book:
    Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Bloomsbury Academic
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Since cinemas earliest days, literary adaptation has provided the movies with stories; and so we use literary terms like metaphor, metonymy and synecdoche to describe visual things. But there is another way of looking at film, and that is through its relationship with the visual arts mainly painting, the oldest of the art forms.
Art History for Filmmakers is an inspiring guide to how images from art can be used by filmmakers to establish period detail, and to teach composition, color theory and lighting. The book looks at the key moments in the development of the Western painting, and how these became part of the Western visual culture from which cinema emerges, before exploring how paintings can be representative of different genres, such as horror, sex, violence, realism and fantasy, and how the images in these paintings connect with cinema.
Insightful case studies explore the links between art and cinema through the work of seven high-profile filmmakers, including Peter Greenaway, Peter Webber, Jack Cardiff, Martin Scorsese, Guillermo del Toro, Quentin Tarantino and Stan Douglas. A range of practical exercises are included in the text, which can be carried out singly or in small teams.
Featuring stunning full-color images, Art History for Filmmakers provides budding filmmakers with a practical guide to how images from art can help to develop their understanding of the visual language of film.

Gillian McIver: author's other books


Who wrote Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

To my wonderful family Gillian McIver CONTENTS - photo 1

To my wonderful family.

Gillian McIver

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION HOW DOES ART HISTORY RELATE TO CINEMA HISTORY At its - photo 2

INTRODUCTION HOW DOES ART HISTORY RELATE TO CINEMA HISTORY At its - photo 3

INTRODUCTION HOW DOES ART HISTORY RELATE TO CINEMA HISTORY At its - photo 4

INTRODUCTION

HOW DOES ART HISTORY RELATE TO CINEMA HISTORY?

At its simplest, art history is the history of painters and paintings, or paintings together with other art forms such as sculpture, from prehistoric times (more than 50,000 years ago) up to the present. It is the story of the development of Western visual culture; more recent interpretations of art history also include the story of how non-Western cultures affect and transform Western visual culture. It is the story of how the canon of artistic excellence was established. It is the story of great personalities, whose innovations and imaginations created significant works. Cinema history is often also structured in a similar way: a history of directors and their films; history of film cultures; history of national film industries; history of the development of film technologies; and so on.

However you decide to tell art history, it is a history stretching back more than 7,000 years, while cinema has a history of less than 150 years. Cinema plugs into art history because both cinema and painting are visual art forms, and cinema uses the imagery and symbolism that have been developed over the course of millennia.

Art history shows how humankind continually grapples with big ideas: mans relationship with God, human social relationships, reality versus ideals, social position, fantasy and imagination, good versus evil, nightmares and fears, nature and the natural worldall have been, and continue to be, explored through visual art.

Why Is Art Important?

All art, including film, may have a biological function. According to research at the University of Toronto, appreciation of art may be a natural process of the human brain. Researchers found that looking at art biologically triggers pleasure, pain, expectations, or other emotions. The results suggest that viewing paintings may not only engage the systems involved in perceiving visual representation and object recognition, but also may structure our underlying emotions and internalized cognitions. So art may be much more important to our human lives than simply being attractive, or decorative, or entertaining.

How Is Art History Useful for Filmmakers?

Most people today are more familiar with the moving image than they are with paintings. Even those who are very knowledgeable about painting cannot escape the fact that the motion picture has been the dominant popular art form since the early twentieth century. When discussing paintings, often the word cinematic crops up for certain painters or paintings. What is this concept, cinematic? The word is often thrown around, but has no precise meaning; yet because we are so familiar with cinema, we intuit that it means a picture that is like cinema: dramatic, narrative, intriguing. A cinematic picture is one that presents a moment in time, in which we can imagine the before and after: a freeze-frame rich in drama with a sense of suspense.

01 The Third Man 1949 Dir Carol Reed The cinematic in film Composition - photo 5

0.1
The Third Man, 1949
Dir. Carol Reed
The cinematic in film. Composition and lighting create atmosphere that enhances the story by visually suggesting the tension and suspense necessary for drama.

WHEN I DONT FEEL IN THE MOOD FOR PAINTING, I GO TO THE MOVIES FOR A WEEK OR MORE. I GO ON A REGULAR MOVIE BINGE.
Edward Hopper, painter

IN A SENSE, PAINTERS AND CINEMATOGRAPHERS ARE CUT FROM THE SAME GENETIC STRAIN.
Sherwood Woody Omens, ASC, cinematographer . Omens studied painting before he switched to filmmaking.

02 Scotland Forever 1881 Artist Lady Elizabeth Butler 1846-1933 The - photo 6

0.2
Scotland Forever, 1881
Artist: Lady Elizabeth Butler (1846-1933)
The cinematic in painting. The cavalry surges forward, toward the viewer, almost hurtling out of the frame. The excitement is palpable, and the picture almost seems to vibrate with action. We are invited to engage, not simply to observe. Notice how white and red are used in the composition to create a sense of unity in the mass of figures: white brings clarity and red attention. We will consider color symbolism and its cultural specificity in .

How the Cinematic Can Be Found in Art

A cinematic picture is one that gives an intimation or suggestion of a story or narrative; there is a clear sense of mise en scne, composition, lighting, and (sometimes to a lesser extent) tonality or color, which puts us in the frame of mind of a motion picture. The cinematic can be found in art when we notice that a picture has certain qualities that are shared with cinema: a dramatic moment, a sense of something happening, a striking composition.

Cinema and much pre-twentieth-century painting are about storytelling. Visual storytelling creates (by design) an intended effect within the viewer. It lends weight to the narrative development and engagement with the overall story by suggesting to viewers that they might consider a particular scene through a particular visual (cultural, genre, etc.) filter. However, we need to remember that a story is driven by its narrative construction, and can survive as a story being told in many visual ways. This can be seen when we consider the different adaptations that have been made of classic novels; for example, Wuthering Heights was adapted in 1939 by William Wyler, in 1992 by Peter Kosminsky, and in 2011 by Andrea Arnold, among others. Luis Buuel made a Spanish language version in Mexico in 1954, Yoshishige Yoshida set his 1988 adaptation (Arashi Ga Oka) in feudal Japan, and several Bollywood versions have also been made. Allowing for the license that adaptations normally take, the story is largely the same in all these films, but they employ very different ways of conveying the story visually.

Filmmaking is imaginative, but to some extent is always bound up with the need to make things appear believable.

The past is a territory that cannot be purely imagined, yet we have few guides to know what it actually looked like. Painting can help give an idea of how past times looked. What is especially convenient is that a painting filters reality, so the image of the pasta stately king, a group of peasants, a sixteenth-century interioralready indicates what are the key significant elements that the viewers eye should look at. Often production designers and cinematographers use paintings as a starting point for recreating the past or imagining new worlds.

But we need to remember that painters and filmmakers interpret the world. They observe it closely and then refine it to the most significant details deemed necessary. This is as true of trying to represent the past as imagining the future.

This book talks about art using the language of film, and demonstrates that the link between the two is strong and unbreakable. It provides a succinct and clear introduction to the history of art, illuminating the historical background of image making and showing how this feeds both directly and indirectly into filmmaking. Throughout the text, both linear and thematic approaches are taken; the emphasis is always on the experience of looking and watching, rather than following academic schools of thought. By using both the language of film and the language of fine art, and comparing the two, the book offers filmmakers a deeper appreciation of art and its value to cinema. The book will be useful to those doing degree-level study in film and also to those preparing to enter the profession of filmmaking, whether in cinematography, directing, production design, or art direction.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling»

Look at similar books to Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling»

Discussion, reviews of the book Art History for Filmmakers: The Art of Visual Storytelling and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.