John Lescroart - Son of Holmes

The first book in the Auguste Lupa series, 1986

All the events in this book are true, despite the disclaimer which you have just read if you read a book from cover to cover. A certain concession has been made so that living persons involved may not be subjected to inconvenience, scrutiny, or unwanted harassment. Nevertheless, no names have been changed, no places altered. The concession has been the disclaimer, which will convince most of the public that even this preface is fiction, though this is not the case.

The Martha Hudson dinner had been set for the sixth of January. To followers of the Master, Sherlock Holmes, this date is as important a day as the year offers, for on January 6, Holmess birthday, his followers from all corners of the globe gather to celebrate his genius. On this date in 1983, I was invited to the Hudson dinner in Arlington, Massachusetts.

At the time, I was living in rather cramped quarters in Cambridge, and a free dinner meant much more to me than intellectual stimulation. I hadnt read many detective stories and knew little about them. However, Id naturally heard about Holmes and thought the night might prove interesting.

It was bitter cold and snowing-the wet, slushy snow of the city-when I left my apartment wrapped in an old army coat. The suit I had borrowed for the affair was ill-fitting, and I waited in great discomfort for the bus out of Harvard Square. The ride to Arlington took nearly forty-five minutes, and I kept asking myself as I shivered if all this was worth a free meal.

For the past several months, I had been trying and failing to make my living as a songwriter in the Boston area. I had finally taken a clerical job to pay the bills, but after less than a month had given that up. I turned to giving piano lessons and within a few weeks had several pupils, their combined fees totaling about sixty dollars per week.

I met Mr. Kevin James in November during one of my pupils recitals. Hed been dragged along by the childs mother, together with a host of other poor souls, and had stood silently near the back door. As soon as the recital began, he slipped out, and I joined him.

Enjoying yourself? I asked.

He leaned languidly against the doorpost. You go to these affairs often?

Naturally. Im the instructor.

How do you stand it?

I shrugged. Comes with the job. Normally they serve punch later. I tapped the pocket of my well-worn coat. Punch with a punch.

He grinned. Dont mind if I do.

We became friends, and he had me to his house for dinner two or three times. One night wed been speaking of detective stories, and he asked me to join him at the Martha Hudson dinner. I was happy to accept.

The dinner was held at a rambling structure in Arlington Heights known, for some obscure reason, as The Ranch. The crowd was not exactly what I had expected, consisting mostly of people my own age. They all appeared rather more well-to-do than I, however, which was not surprising.

As drinks were served, we all congregated in the large drawing room, the principal furnishings of which were the bookshelves that lined three of the walls, the huge oil portrait of, I later learned, the Master, and a long table upon which had been set bound copies of some reference works, a violin, a pipe, and a cap. Our host, Mr. Hugo Arrowroot, proposed a toast to Martha Hudson, then to Holmes, after which things assumed a more informal air. We ate a fine dinner of which coq au vin was the main course and, over brandy, fell into a heated discussion concerning the actual existence of fictional characters.

It all began, I imagine, said Kevin, with Dante, when he included in his fictional Divine Comedy portraits of his enemies. I would suppose its even an older practice than that.

Much older, offered another of the guests, a hirsute Harvard student. All the Greek playwrights did it in their comedies. Aristophanes got in a lot of trouble because of it.

Not surprising, Kevin continued, and were all familiar with historical works that are, finally, more fictitious than the most imaginative novel. Several students chuckled.

Kevin was smoking a briar, sitting on the edge of the table, fingering the open pages of one of the reference works. But consider this angle. Suppose there was a man whose life was as interesting as could be hoped, and he had a companion who was given to writing. Could that companion refrain from biography? A Boswell to Johnson relationship? I doubt it. But again, suppose that the principal involved eschewed this kind of aggrandizing publicity, for any number of reasons, and forbade his companion to publish. What could they do? One solution would be to publish the biography as a fictional account, using fictional names but actual events.

I contend that in this theory lies the root of truth in our more celebrated detective heroes. He paused and relit his pipe.

Youre not saying that you think Holmes actually existed? I said.

Precisely, John, precisely.

Arrowroot spoke up. Its not a new theory at all. As far back as 1900, readers were proposing it. Holmes was still alive at that time, remember.

But a man of his supposed stature? I protested. I should think that, even fictionalized, hed be immediately recognizable to the public.

James Bond isnt, Kevin said.

James Bond! Come on.

They shrugged at one another. Its been established that hes alive and working right now. Of course, though it hurts to admit it, Fleming was better at peripherals than Conan Doyle.

Peripherals? I asked.

You know, names of minor characters, addresses, that sort of thing. Fleming never used real names or addresses, at least so far as we know. And while, of course, Holmes was not named Holmes and didnt live at 221B Baker Street -actually we think he lived in Bond Street near Selfridges-Conan Doyle couldnt help but leave a few characters untouched. He was probably leaving us clues. He had such a fine sense of play. But Hugo, here, is really the expert. He turned to Arrowroot. Perhaps youd like to take it from here.

All right, he said, but Im sure wed all be more comfortable sitting down.

We went out to the hall and brought in more chairs. The novices among us, of whom there were about five including myself, joked about this preposterous theory. When wed gotten arranged and the brandy had been passed again, Arrowroot, from a large chair near the fireplace, began:

The characters that Conan Doyle-or should I say Watson?-left intact for us were Martha Hudson and Irene Adler. Youre all familiar with Martha Hudson; at least you should be after this evening. She worked for the man who was Holmes until he died in Sussex Downs, after which she came back to London and worked for Lord Peter Thatcher, of the Bank of London, until 1938. She never divulged Holmess true identity, except of course to Thatcher as a reference. In all probability, Thatcher himself knew long before. In any event, when Thatcher died in the bombings of London, the secret of Holmess identity was lost forever, since Mrs. Hudson died shortly after she began her retirement, and certainly Conan Doyle never told.

There was also, as Ive said, Irene Adler, the only woman, according to Holmes. She was, indeed, a famous Continental singer in the late 1800s, who disappeared between the years 1892 and 1894. And mark this: those are the very years that Holmes disappeared after following Moriarty to the Reichenbach Falls. He paused for a moment.

Ive read somewhere, ventured another guest, that letters addressed to 221B Baker Street get answered, though.