• Complain

Anthony Arthur - Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair

Here you can read online Anthony Arthur - Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2006, publisher: Random House, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Few American writers have revealed their private as well as their public selves so fully as Upton Sinclair, and virtually none over such a long lifetime (18781968). Sinclairs writing, even at its most poignant or electrifying, blurred the line between politics and artand, indeed, his life followed a similar arc. In Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair, Anthony Arthur weaves the strands of Sinclairs contentious public career and his often-troubled private life into a compelling personal narrative.
An unassuming teetotaler with a fiery streak, called a propagandist by some, the most conservative of revolutionaries by others, Sinclair was such a driving force of history that one could easily mistake his life story for historical fiction. He counted dozens of epochal figures as friends or confidants, including Mark Twain, Jack London, Henry Ford, Thomas Mann, H. G. Wells, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt, Albert Einstein, Charlie Chaplin, Albert Camus, and Carl Jung.
Starting with The Jungle in 1906, Sinclairs fiction and nonfiction helped to inform and mold American opinions about socialism, labor and industry, religion and philosophy, the excesses of the media, American political isolation and pacifism, civil liberties, and mental and physical health.
In his later years, Sinclair twice reinvented himself, first as the Democratic candidate for governor of California in 1934, and later, in his sixties and seventies, as a historical novelist. In 1943 he won a Pulitzer Prize for Dragons Teeth, one of eleven novels featuring super-spy Lanny Budd.
Outside the literary realm, the ever-restless Sinclair was seemingly everywhere: forming Utopian artists colonies, funding and producing Sergei Eisensteins film documentaries, and waging consciousness-raising political campaigns. Even when he wasnt involved in progressive causes or counterculture movements, his name often was invoked by theman arrangement that frequently embroiled Sinclair in controversy.
Sinclairs passion and optimistic zeal inspired America, but privately he could be a frustrated, petty man who connected better with his readers than with members of his own family. His life with his first wife, Meta, his son David, and various friends and professional acquaintances was a web of conflict and strain. Personally and professionally ambitious, Sinclair engaged in financial speculation, although his wealth-generating schemes often benefited his pet causesand he lobbied as tirelessly for professional recognition and awards as he did for government reform. As the tenor of his work would suggest, Sinclair was supremely human.
In Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair, Anthony Arthur offers an engrossing and enlightening account of Sinclairs life and the country he helped to transform. Taking readers from the Reconstruction South to the rise of American power to the pinnacle of Hollywood culture to the Civil Rights era, this is historical biography at its entertaining and thought-provoking finest.
Praise
Lively, unsparing look at the turn-of-the-century muckraker, social critic and novelist who changed the way America did business....Arthur organizes his biography into chapters reflecting Sinclairs various crusading selvese.g., The Warrior, The Pilgrim of Love, etc.and uses a deft, light touch...An immensely readable biography.Kirkus Reviews
..excellent new biography. USA Today

a model of good biography. Los Angeles Magazine
Absorbing. The Wall Street Journal
intimate and intellectually astute.- The New Yorker
enlightening, frequently stinging biography . . . Arthur organizes a vast amount of information into a fast-flowing, witty, and incisive narrative. - Booklist [starred review]
a well-researched, balanced and fascinating portrait. - Publishers Weekly
Neither hagiographic nor condescending, Arthur is an exemplary biographer, interested in human beings for their own sake, in all their unvarnished oddity. - The Nation
Few authors have led as full and fascinating a career, and rare is the biographer capable of packing the fascinating fullness as compactly and apparently completely as Arthur has done. Chicago Sun Times
an engrossing and enlightening account of Sinclairs life and the country he helped to transform. . . historical biography at its entertaining and thought-provoking finest. Forbes Book Club
The chapters in Radical Innocent that describe the research and writing of The Jungle the most famous and still the most powerful of all the muckraking novels are thrilling. . . .Arthur captures nicely Sinclairs almost absurd innocence, his boundless enthusiasm as he met journalists, welfare workers, labor organizers and the men and women who worked in the slaughterhouses. Los Angeles Times
an outstanding biography. I recommend it without reservation. David M. Kinchen, Huntington News Network Book Critic:
a bracing biography. Boston Globe
admirable . . . compelling look at an intellectual life lived to maximum effect. Philadelphia Inquirer:
engaging and perceptive . . . sensitive, engrossing, and even amusing exploration of Sinclairs complex private life. - Christian Science Monitor
graceful new biography.- Columbia Journalism Review
It is to Arthurs credit that he can make Sinclair not only interesting yet likeable . . . Radical Innocent is not only refreshing, its a shock to read: a biography of a survivor. . . The author has done a Herculean job of sifting through what must, literarily, have been tons of material to produce a thoroughly readable book about a complex man.- Toronto Star
Radical Innocent is a wonderful gift . . . a vital biography of an American treasure, and Arthur proves himself as Sinclairs vital biographer. - American Way [American Airlines Magazine]
Few authors have led as full and fascinating a career, and rare is the biographer capable of packing the fascinating fullness as compactly - and apparently completely - as Arthur has done. -Denver Post
The book provides an interesting narrative on an extraordinary American life. It not only offers specific details rendered from meticulous research, but also a historical context that makes it easier to understand the circumstances of the time period in which this most conservative of revolutionaries worked.-The Post and Courier

Anthony Arthur: author's other books


Who wrote Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Table of Contents For John Ahouse PROLOGUE Indiana University Bloomin - photo 1

Table of Contents For John Ahouse PROLOGUE Indiana University Bloomington - photo 2

Table of Contents For John Ahouse PROLOGUE Indiana University Bloomington - photo 3

Table of Contents

For John Ahouse

PROLOGUE

Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
October 19, 1963

In 1895, when Upton Sinclair was sixteen years old, his English teacher in New York commended him for giving a speech that demonstrated earnestness, feeling, spirit, and appreciation of his piece. Particularly appealing to his classmates, the perceptive teacher noted, was the young scholars freedom from affectation.

Upton Sinclairs audience on this autumn evening in 1963 was much larger than it had been in 1895an overflow crowd of more than three thousand, mostly students. At eighty-five years old, his slender body was stooped. The bright stage lights highlighted his thinning white hair, his age spots, his prominent beak of a nose and the round wire-rimmed spectacles that perched on it. His voice, as he announced the subject of his talk Changing America and What Will Happen to You if You Trywas thin and high, but it was strong enough to hold the halls attention for the next ninety minutes. Not once during that time did Sinclair refer to notes. They were not necessary, because he was doing what he had done for most of his lifetelling a story that was close to his heart with earnestness, feeling, spirit, and appreciation of his piece.

Sinclairs story was an appealing one for a generation of college students whose idealism had recently been aroused by the election as president of the energetic young John F. Kennedy. Simply put, it was that one man, fired by the zeal to end injustice, could do itor at least he could come close and, in America, as opposed to most other countries, live happily ever after. The old warriors talk concerned his various battles with captains of industry. Of these, the best known and most important was his first, with Ogden Armour, the Chicago meatpacker whose plant Sinclair made the key setting for The Jungle in 1906. That book, which helped secure the subsequent passage of Pure Food and Drug legislation, would by itself have guaranteed Sinclair a niche in American history. Indeed, it was for The Jungle, published when he was just twenty-seven years old, that most of his audience in Bloomington knew him.

For a time it appeared as though The Jungle would mark the end as well as the beginning of Sinclairs career. He was dismissed by some critics as a mere muckraker, one of those pesky investigative reporters bent on stirring up trouble. He also had trouble handling his subsequent renown. After all, he had been praised in a review of The Jungle by Winston Churchill as a man of very great gifts and even invited to chat with Teddy Roosevelt at the White House. He became entangled in several communes and was unfairly tarred as a debauched advocate of free love. His first wife ran off with his best friend, an affair that his new notoriety guaranteed was front-page tabloid news. His second wife saw to it that he was estranged for decades from his only childnow a distinguished physicist seated in the front row of the audience. For a long time he was regarded as a one-book wonder, producing a string of failed novels over the next fifteen years.

But Sinclair bounced back, as he would do throughout his lifefirst with a series of popular nonfiction attacks in the 1920s on religion, the press, and education in modern America, and then as a politician, nearly becoming the governor of California in 1934. His true fulfillment as a writer would come after he turned sixty. Having spent a lifetime as a self-described socialist propagandist, he turned to historical fiction in a series of eleven novels about the wars of the twentieth century. His appealing hero Lanny Budd, through whose eyes these stories are told, knew everyone from Hitler and Gring to FDR and Truman. In 1943 Sinclair won the Pulitzer Prize for Dragons Teeth, which described the rise of Nazi Germany.

Even the intrepid Lanny was a relatively passive observer compared to his creator, who both witnessed and shaped the history of the twentieth century. As a young man, Upton Sinclair knew Mark Twain, Jack London, and Theodore Roosevelt. In his middle years, he formed a political alliance with Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and won the admiring friendship of men as various as Albert Einstein, Charlie Chaplin, Thomas Mann, and George Bernard Shaw. As an old man, he was corresponding with Carl Jung and Albert Camus, and in 1967 President Lyndon Johnson honored him at a special White House ceremony.

Sinclair was the most conservative of revolutionaries. The author of some ninety books and innumerable articles and essays, he had no patience with stream-of-consciousness narratives or even free verse. He liked a writer to have something to say, and to say it with clarity and precision, Sinclair said of his alter ego Lanny Budd, just as he disliked loud noises and confusion, and obscurity cultivated as a form of exclusiveness. He was also a straitlaced puritan concerning sexthis, despite at least one extramarital fling and an intemperate habit when young of linking marriage with prostitution and slavery. In a period when heavy drinking was widely seen to be a social necessity, if not a virtue, he despised alcohol, which had killed his father. Indeed, he disdained any form of indulgence: he even worried about his fondness for cakes and pies, fearing that he had it in him to become a food drunkard.

These attributes, coupled with Sinclairs customary insistence that he knew best what was right for everyone else, encouraged extreme views among both his admirers and his detractors. To one disciple he was a dearly beloved saint; to another, one who has been marked by the Gods as one who shall blaze the trail. And to a third, a woman suffering from multiple sclerosis, he was someone who understands: PLEASE PLEASE, Mr. Sinclair, write to me, she begged. That is all I ask. His quick response, she replied gratefully, was a purest ray serene. You have been sweet and kind to write to me.

But the saint could also be self-righteous and petulant, even absurd. His friend and onetime protg Sinclair Lewisthe general public still confuses the author of Babbitt and Main Street with Upton Sinclairhowled when Sinclair chided him in print for making too much money: My God, Upton, go and pray for forgiveness, honesty, and humility! H. L. Mencken traded letters and barbs for many years with Sinclair and teased him for his credulity complex, for not seeing that the common people are damned to be diddled forever. Sinclairs own socialist publisher threw up his hands in dismay over his belief in ESP and ghosts, calling him an egregious sucker, a zanie, and the Daniel Boone of Spookology. And these were his friends. His enemies compared him to Peter the Hermit and to Savonarola, the fanatical Florentine monk who got himself burned at the stake.

Sinclair himself used characters from history, religion, and literature as favored points of reference and departure. His typical plot sent a naive seeker in search of truth: Voltaires Candide was one of his models, as was Christian in The Pilgrims Progress, a traveler in what John Bunyan called the wilderness of the world. Another Sinclair favorite was Siddhartha, the Indian prince who gave up his land and his treasures, and went out to wander with a beggars bowl, in the hope of finding some truth about life that was not known at court.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair»

Look at similar books to Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair»

Discussion, reviews of the book Radical Innocent: Upton Sinclair and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.