• Complain

Nicholas Murray - The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914

Here you can read online Nicholas Murray - The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Potomac Books, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Potomac Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Nicholas Murray s The Rocky Road to the Great War examines the evolution of field fortification theory and practice between 1877 and 1914. During this period field fortifications became increasingly important, and their construction evolved from primarily above to below ground. The reasons for these changes are crucial to explaining the landscape of World War I, yet they have remained largely unstudied.The transformation in field fortifications reflected not only the ongoing technological advances but also the changing priorities in the reasons for constructing them, such as preventing desertion, protecting troops, multiplying forces, reinforcing tactical points, providing a secure base, and dominating an area. Field fortification theory, however, did not evolve solely in response to improving firepower or technology. Rather, a combination of those factors and societal ones for example, the rise of large conscript armies and the increasing participation of citizens rather than subjects led directly to technical alterations in the actual construction of the fieldworks. These technical developments arose from the second wave of the Industrial Revolution in the late nineteenth century that provided new technologies that increased the firepower of artillery, which in turn drove the transition from above- to belowground field fortification.Based largely on primary sources including French, British, Austrian, and American military attach reports Murray s enlightening study is unique in defining, fully examining, and contextualizing the theories and construction of field fortifications before World War I.

Nicholas Murray: author's other books


Who wrote The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

The Rocky Road to the Great War

RELATED TITLES FROM POTOMAC BOOKS

Duffys War: Fr. Francis Duffy, Wild Bill Donovan,
and the Irish Fighting 69th in World War I

by Stephen L. Harris

Duty, Honor, Privilege: New York Citys Silk Stocking
Regiment and the Breaking of the Hindenburg Line

by Stephen L. Harris

Tannenberg: Clash of Empires, 1914
by Dennis Showalter

THE ROCKY ROAD TO THE GREAT WAR

The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914

NICHOLAS MURRAY

FOREWORD BY HEW STRACHAN

Copyright 2013 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska All rights - photo 1

Copyright 2013 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska

All rights reserved

Potomac Books is an imprint of the University of Nebraska Press.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Murray, Nicholas, 1966 The rocky road to the Great War: the evolution of trench warfare to 1914 / Nicholas Murray; foreword by Hew Strachan. First Edition

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-1-59797-553-7 (hardcover: alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-61234-105-7 (electronic) 1. Fortification, FieldHistory. 2. IntrenchmentsHistory. 3. Military art and scienceHistory. I. Title.

UG403.M87 2013

355.44dc23

2013008396

Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute z39-48 Standard.

Potomac Books
22841 Quicksilver Drive
Dulles, Virginia 20166

First Edition

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Contents
Illustrations
FIGURES

)

MAPS
TABLE
Foreword

The trenches of the First World War have a bad reputation. Smelly and muddy, rat and lice infested, they do not rate among the most beautiful of military constructions. Nor, unlike the castles of the Middle Ages or the fortifications of Vauban, have they lasted well. They defined not only the western front but also the war as a whole and what it meant for a generation. Yet, a hundred years later, we need to look carefully if we are to detect where they once were.

Their notoriety is undeserved. They saved lives; without them the war would have been even more destructive than it was. In the half century before 1914, a revolution in firepower transformed the battlefield, creating a beaten zone swept by machine-gun fire and quick-firing artillery. Tactically, the attack became much harder to execute and its demands of human endurance even greaterat least in the minds of the general staffs that had to find a solution to the problem. One answer, and the one for which they have been most often castigated, was to stress the importance of morale and the need, in the final rush, to press home the offensive, cost what it will. But this was neither the solution most regularly adopted in the First World War nor the only one to which military minds were bent before it. An alternative was to develop field fortifications, to think through how to fight the defensive battle, and to devise ways of making it strategically effective as well as tactically sensible. That is the storya neglected one but one without which we cannot understand twentieth-century warfarethat Nicholas Murray tells in his important book.

In the aftermath of the Napoleonic wars, permanent fortification, built of masonry and stone, came to be seen as a specialist matter, separated from the conduct of campaigns of maneuver, and studied by a separate and self-contained part of the army. It was a subject for geeks, and it also cost a lot of money. The latter was a serious consideration when the technical advances in artillery, permitting heavier calibers to take the field and enabling them to fire with greater precision and consistency, presented fixed defenses with continuous obsolescence. Those built by France in the decade after the Franco-Prussian War were out of date ten years later, with adoption of smokeless powder and reinforced concrete.

Field fortification was cheaper than permanent structures, and defenses made of earth, reinforced with materials like wood, could be constructed more quickly and in locations where they were actively needed. It was not just price and materials that made field fortification attractive. It also fulfilled one of the cardinal principles of war, that of economy of force, and it did so in at least three ways. The first has already been mentioned: that of saving lives. Second, mass armies, made up of short-service conscripts, often with low levels of discipline and training, promised to be both easier to control and more effective if placed in defensive positions. At their most basic, they made desertion more difficult. And, third, a fortified position could be held defensively with fewer men, releasing others for operations elsewhere, including the offensive. In other words, field fortification could enable maneuver, as well as retard it.

Extraordinarily, no scholar has told before the story that Nicholas Murray tells here. Perhaps its importance has been too obvious; more probably, as he suggests himself, the determination to criticize the military thinkers who flourished in Europe between the ending of the Franco-Prussian War and the outbreak of the First World War, has prompted historians to deny such an obvious manifestation of common sense and pragmatism. Contained within it are the histories of five wars, the Russo-Turkish War of 18771878, the South African War of 18991902, the Russo-Japanese War of 19041905, and the two Balkan Wars of 19121913. All five were fundamentally shaped by field fortification and its application on the battlefield, and all were, in that sense and others, precursors of the First World War. Some of these conflicts themselves qualify for the epithet neglected, and for all of them the role of field fortification has long demanded that they be examined not only in their own right but also for their contribution to changes in the conduct of war as the latter absorbed the impact of industrialization. Nicholas Murray has carried out research in archives in London, Paris, Vienna, and the United States, and he has ransacked the professional literature of a reflective and deeply committed generation of soldiers. He has filled a massive gap in the history of war. All those who study it are in his debt.

Hew Strachan
Chichele Professor of the History of War
University of Oxford

Preface

Between 1877 and 1914 the use of field fortification became increasingly important, and its construction evolved from primarily above-to belowground. These changes explain the landscape of the First World War, yet they have remained largely unstudied. This book defines, examines, and tests the theories and construction of field fortification between 1877 and 1914 for the first time.

The changes that took place in constructing field fortifications reflected the technological developments then occurring and the changing priorities of the forces reasons for constructing them. Those reasons included preventing desertion, protecting troops, multiplying forces, reinforcing tactical points, providing a secure base, and achieving domination of an area. Field fortification theory and practice changed not solely at the whim of improving firepower or technology but rather through a combination of those factors as well as societal ones.

The primary sources of information for the case studies are the reports of military attachs who observed the conflicts. Frequently the observers witnessed events in person or were in a position to interview recent combatants. They were also military men with an understanding of the nature of war and, consequently, of much of what they witnessed. Many of their reports were disseminated around the armed forces of their respective countries in the form of histories or campaign reports. The other main source material is taken from contemporary technical manuals, which provide an exact idea of what was going on at a specific moment in time. The exception is for the chapter on the Second Anglo-Boer War of 18991902. The attachs in this war were at the front only a limited time, and most of them went home as soon as the major fighting ended. Thus, they largely missed seeing the prolonged guerrilla war and the extensive use of fortifications later in the conflict. In addition, as Britain was one of the combatants during the war and did not have any attachs to speak of, I have chosen to include a number of personal accounts with their firsthand eyewitness descriptions of events to supplement the reports of the French, Austrian, and American attachs. I have also used the official history rather more for this chapter than is the case in the other wars examined. This solution is not perfect, but it does allow the reader to study the war with some level of detail.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914»

Look at similar books to The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Rocky Road to the Great War: The Evolution of Trench Warfare to 1914 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.