• Complain

Howard Jablon - Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937

Here you can read online Howard Jablon - Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Lexington, year: 2002, publisher: University Press of Kentucky, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Howard Jablon Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937
  • Book:
    Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Press of Kentucky
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2002
  • City:
    Lexington
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In this provocative interpretation of New Deal diplomacy, Howard Jablon challenges the view that the State Department was wiser and more expert at international maneuver than was President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the early years of his presidency. These were years of growing world tension, with the preliminary shots of World War II being fired as Japan took over Manchuria, Italy made Ethiopia an extension of its new Roman Empire, and all the European great powers tried out their new weaponry in Spain. The author argues that the departments advice in this period actually led to unfortunate decisions which later had a considerable impact on events leading to World War II.Former Secretary of State Cordell Hull wrote in his memoirs that the United States was at the oriental crossroads of decision in 1934. Hull and his colleagues in the State Department did not suggest blocking the Japanese. Instead, they recommended continuing the ineffective nonrecognition policy. Consequently, the roads taken by American diplomacy at this and other junctures were equally unfortunate.To date no one has criticized the influence of the State Department on New Deal diplomacy. Crossroads of Decision represents a timely and important contribution to our understanding of both the State Department and foreign policy in this interwar period of rapid change, when diplomatic courses were set that allowed for no turning back.

Howard Jablon: author's other books


Who wrote Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
CROSSROADS OF DECISION
HOWARD JABLON
CROSSROADS
OF DECISION
The State Department
and Foreign Policy,
1933-1937
Copyright 1983 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the - photo 1
Copyright 1983 by The University Press of Kentucky
Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth,
serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre
College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University,
The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College,
Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University,
Morehead State University, Murray State University,
Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University,
University of Kentucky, University of Louisville,
and Western Kentucky University.
All rights reserved.
Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky
663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Jablon, Howard.
Crossroads of decision.
Bibliography: p.
Includes index
1. United States.Dept. of State.2. United StatesForeign policy19331945.I. Title.
JX1706.A41983353.182-40459
ISBN 0-8131-1483-7
ISBN 0-8131-9057-6 (pbk.)
This book is printed on acid-free recycled paper meeting the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials.
Picture 2
Manufactured in the United States of America
Contents
For my children
Lisa and Erica
Preface
In his memoirs, former Secretary of State Cordell Hull states that in 1934 the United States was at the Oriental crossroads of decision. One road led to acquiescence to Japanese expansion. The other road led to resisting that expansion, with force if necessary. Hull remembers why he and President Roosevelt chose the second road. But Hulls recollection of the events of 1934 was faulty. He and his colleagues in the State Department did not advise curtailing Japanese ambitions. Instead, they merely continued the policy of nonrecognition and espoused the ideals of the Open Door. That approach achieved nothing.
Nevertheless, Hulls memory serves us well by reminding us of the critical nature of decision making in the early New Deal period. The United States was at a crossroads where many policy decisions intersected. The country had to select the appropriate direction for American policy in Europe, Latin America, and Africa, as well as the Orient. Crises occurred in each area that presented the Roosevelt administration with difficult choices. Selecting the appropriate path was made more arduous by the overriding need for the new administration to rehabilitate a devastated economy at home.
During the early New Deal period, from 1933 to 1937, the State Department assisted Roosevelt in the formulation of foreign policy decisions. At that time, the department enjoyed greater influence than it was to have later on when Roosevelt participated more directly in foreign affairs. For the most part, its influence was not beneficial. The department stubbornly adhered to principles or universal formulas or doctrines that did not fit the demands of particular situations. The Open Door policy, the Good Neighbor policy, the Reciprocal Trade Agreement program, the nonrecognition doctrine, neutrality, and noninterference all failed in one way or another to achieve the lofty goals they were supposed to achieve. There was, moreover, an excessive reliance on diplomatic techniques: signing treaties, reaching agreements, attending international meetings, and extending or withholding recognition of governments. In short, there is nothing to suggest that the State Department, despite its impressive array of professional diplomats and technical advisers, possessed any greater wisdom than the president.
To date, little has been written on the influence of the State Department on New Deal diplomacy. We have studies like Robert Dalleks, which survey the entire era from a presidential perspective, or studies that deal with single problems, like Robert A. Divines work on neutrality and Armin Rappaports and Dorothy Borgs on the bilateral relationship with Japan.
Like Feis, I believe that 1933 was an important year in foreign affairs as well as domestic. Unlike Feis, I have not limited the study to one year but have extended it to 1937, when Roosevelt began to take direct control of foreign policy. I also emphasize different aspects of the department in that period. Whereas Feis concentrates on personalities and events, I concentrate on ideas and policy. Furthermore, I disagree with his favorable interpretation, and I present a critical view of the recommendations the department made.
At the outset, I want to express my gratitude to those people who, in one way or another, made the completion of this book possible.
At Rutgers University I was fortunate in having two men with entirely different viewpoints supervise my work. The late L. Ethan Elliss seminar in the diplomacy of the 1930s was an exercise in the Rankian school of writing wie eseigentlich gewesen. Later, I learned from Lloyd Gardner to appreciate history as Lord Acton described it: as the record of truths revealed by experience... [and] an instrument of action and power that goes to the making of the future.
Good criticism is often difficult to find, and I consider myself very fortunate in having received the comments of several knowledgeable readers. Warren Sussman read the initial draft of this book. Wayne Cole subsequently corrected some flaws in my approach to the arms embargo controversy. Harold Hyman patiently sorted out both substantive and stylistic errors as the work neared completion.
I am also indebted to the staffs of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, the Houghton Library of Harvard University, the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, the Yale University Library, the manuscript division of the Library of Congress, and the National Archives. I appreciate the opportunity I had to read the manuscripts under their care.
Two journals, Mid-America and The Historian, graciously allowed me to include in this book two articles I had written and they had published. is based on my article The State Department and Collective Security, 1933-34, The Historian 33, no. 2 (February 1971), 248-63.
Marlene Bennett, an extraordinary typist, created order out of chaos. My colleagues, Sally Black and John Pappas, proofread the book and made it even more orderly.
We were now at the Oriental crossroads of decision. There were two courses open to us. One was to withdraw gradually, perhaps with dignity, from the Far East. This meant acquiescence in the nullification of our treaty rights, the closing of the Open Door, further Japanese appropriation of pieces of China and other territory, relinquishing the protection of our citizens and abandoning them to unequal competition with Japanese-operated monopolies....
The other course was to continue to insist on the maintenance of law, on our legitimate rights and interests in the Far East, and on observance of the treaties and declarations that guaranteed an independent China and pledged equality to all nations, nonintervention, nonaggression, and peaceful settlement of disputes in the Orient. This meant a firm, though not an aggressive, policy toward Japan, especially in the light of her evident plans of territorial expansion by force. It meant adequate military preparedness....
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937»

Look at similar books to Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937»

Discussion, reviews of the book Crossroads of Decision: The State Department and Foreign Policy, 1933-1937 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.