For my father, John Micallef, who showed me the way.
FORWARD
With the official demise of the Soviet Union in December 1991, we could claim, finally, to have won World War II. Now the problem was to win World War I. As the Cold War glaciers retreated, they exposed the detritus of this earlier conflict, suspended during the superpower competition, but now unfrozen. Nowhere was this truer than in the Balkans, where the synthetic compound that was Yugoslavia could no longer be held together, or the Middle East, where the detonated Ottoman Empire continued to emit decay products. Thus, we cannot begin to understand todays world, or our strategic choices in this world, unless we know something about World War Ior even better, quite a lot about it.
Joseph Micallef has given this short work an appropriate title. It is, in fact, concise. But reading it leads to a surprisingly comprehensive understanding of the First World War. This is so because his short book deals with every facet of the conflictits historical setting, its economics, its politics, its psychologyand not just its military aspects. Few authors could so authoritatively put the story of World War I inside the history of western civilization.
And when it comes to more-or-less purely military matters, this book certainly incorporates rich detail, but situates it in wide-ranging and inclusive context. In our thoughts, we often place the war in Flanders Fields, or the soggy northeast of France. Micallef certainly tells that tale, but reminds us also of battles fought in the hills and plains of northern Italy, in the forests of Central Europe and the deserts of the Middle East, in Africa and Asia, and even of the echoes of battle heard in the Western Hemisphere. Our primary mental image may be of thundering artillery barrages fired over men trapped in mindless, bacterial trench warfare. Micallef is vivid when describing their plight, but in addition writes cogently about a war of maneuver at sea and in the air. The ancient and honorable charge with fixed bayonets is thoroughly described, and alongside it the impact of modern industrial technology: the war of chemistry, of balloons, of train schedules, of tanks, of machine guns finally synchronized with propeller blades.
This brief work by Joseph Micallef is the best shortcut I know to an understanding of this momentous conflict. It is informative without being academic. It is nicely written, full of well-turned phrases. And it is as accurate as those bullets fired into the breasts of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie by Gavrilo Princip, the Bosnian Serb who started the whole thing.
As this is written, we enter the mid-teens of the twenty-first century, shortly to begin a four year remembrance, the centenary of The Great War, The War To End All War, the war that shaped and changed our worldindeed literally revolutionized it. We will want to read as much as we can so as to appreciate our march through the calendar that recalls and memorializes the weighty events of a century earlier. But if you have to settle for just one book, this is it.
General Merrill A. McPeak, USAF (RET.)
INTRODUCTION
It began with a botched murder. By the time it had ended, over sixteen million people had lost their lives. Seventy million men took up arms, nine million of them never returned home. More than four times that number had been wounded. It was supposed to be the war to end all war. Instead the Great War began a cycle of violence that would shape the twentieth century, bring about another world war within a generation, spawn a cold war that would divide the continent of Europe for half a century, and leave echoes that still reverberate in the twenty-first century.
It was the first war of the industrial age. It mobilized the industrial might and the scientific genius of the developed nations, and galvanized their populations into total war. At its peak, almost ninety percent of the worlds population had chosen sides. It contrasted honor and duty against rapid-fire machine guns and poison gas. lan against massed artillery. The machine guns and the artillery won, but at a frightful human cost.
The war redrew the map of Europe, reshuffled its colonies, and brought four great empires: the Ottoman Turks, the Hapsburgs of Austria-Hungary, the Hohenzollerns of Germany, and the Romanovs of Russia, to an inglorious end. It even caused the British royal family to change its name from the overtly Germanic Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to the House of Windsor.
It also heralded the rise of a new world order. For the first time, millions of American doughboys crossed the Atlantic in the defense of European liberty. It would not be the last time. It underscored the twilight of the old world, while the new flexed its industrial and financial power.
This is the story of the First World War, a bloody four-year conflict that shaped the twentieth century. It saw the beginning of the transfer of power amongst the English speaking peoples from Great Britain to the United States of America, and laid the foundation for the American Age that would follow.
CHAPTER 1
A BOTCHED MURDER
The dawn of the twentieth century found the Balkans in chaos. The steady decline of the Ottoman Empire over the course of the nineteenth century had spawned a series of revolts by its subject peoples. On the fringes two rival empires, the Russian and the Austro-Hungarian, maneuvered for the spoils. They were driven in equal measure by the desire to expand their own territory and influence, and also to deny that opportunity to their historic rival.
The Kingdom of Serbia
In 1878, after a half-century of struggle, the Serbs finally established the independent kingdom of Serbia, ruled by King Peter I. His son, the Russian educated Prince Alexander, was in command of the countrys armed forces. Bosnia, however, which possessed a sizable Serbian population, had been incorporated into the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Serbian groups in both countries dreamed of unification. A variety of nationalist groups were formed to achieve that end, many with the unofficial support and funding of the Serbian government in Belgrade. As the twentieth century unfolded, the Balkans in general, and the Serbian lands in particular, were a powder keg. All that was needed was a spark. It would come on June 28, 1914, at the hand of a sickly, nineteen-year-old Bosnian student suffering from tuberculosis.
King Peter I and Prince Alexander
FATE AND THE BLACK HAND
Gavrilo Princip was an unlikely revolutionary. As a young student in Sarajevo, the Bosnian capital, he had participated in demonstrations in February 1912 directed against the Austro-Hungarian authorities, and had been expelled from school as a result. Moving to Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, to continue his studies, he attempted to join various Serbian nationalist organizations including the komite, an irregular Serbian guerrilla force organized by the secret society Unification or Death. The group was also known by the moniker, the Black Hand. Rejected for service as being too small and too sickly, Princip nonetheless came under the influence of several of its members, and received some rudimentary training in how to handle firearms and explosives.