EROS AND THE JEWS
EROS
AND THE
JEWS
From
Biblical Israel to
Contemporary America
DAVID BIALE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Berkeley Los Angeles London
University of California Press
Berkeley and Los Angeles, California
University of California Press, Ltd.
London, England
1997
The Regents of the University of California
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Biale, David, 1949
Eros and the Jews : from biblical Israel to contemporary America /
David Biale.
p. cm.
Originally published: New York, NY : BasicBooks, cl992.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-520-21134-0 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. SexReligious aspectsJudaism. 2. JewsSexual behavior
History 3. Sexual ethics. 4. Ethics, Jewish. I. Title.
BM720.S4B53 1997
97-13465
296.3'66'09dc21
CIP
Portions of Chapter 7, "Eros and Enlightenment," appeared previously in three places: As a lecture published by the American Jewish Committee; as a chapter in Steven M. Cohen and Paula E. Hyman, eds., The Jewish Family: Myths and Reality (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1986), 4561; and as an article in Polin: A Journal of Polish-Jewish Studies 1 (1986): 4967. Permission to republish this material is gratefully acknowledged.
Printed in the United States of America
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The paper used in this publication is both acid-free and totally chlorine-free (TCF). It meets the minimum requirements of American Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
FOR RACHELI
Song of Songs 8:67
PREFACE
T HIS book had its origins over ten years ago, in a casual question from a colleague about the role of sexuality in I. B. Singer's story "Gimpel the Fool." Singer's stories revel in magic and the demonic, forces that he associates with sexuality. As I thought about Singer's idiosyncratic view of the role of Eros in Eastern European Jewish culture, I wondered whether he had created it himself or whether he was not perhaps embellishing upon some long-standing traditions. Little did I realize that I was embarking on a quest that was to lead me back from the modern period to the Middle Ages, talmudic culture, and finally the Bible itself.
Thinking about Singer led me first to investigate the literary culture of the Jews of nineteenth-century Eastern Europe. These writers, both highbrow and low-brow, created the Hebrew and Yiddish literary tradition to which Singer was heir. I became particularly interested in the autobiographies and other writings of the maskilim, the Jewish disciples of Enlightenment (Haskalah). As opposed to Singer, who drew upon popular culture, these writers held that traditional Jewish society suppressed erotic desire and created stunted and neurotic Jews, rather like Philip Roth's Alexander Portnoy. I suddenly realized that a novel like Portnoy's Complaint , with which this book begins, was not so much the bizarre creation of an obsessed American Jewish writer as it was another link in a long literary tradition.
Reading these nineteenth-century authors, I was skeptical that the Jewish culture they were describing reflected the real historical tradition. After all, did not Judaism, as opposed to Christianity, affirm sexuality as a healthy expression of this-worldliness? I noticed that the maskilim were particularly concerned with Hasidism, the eighteenth-century pietistic movement in Eastern Europe, and that their sweeping accusations against traditional sexual and marital practices seemed to be based primarily on their image of this movement. This led me to examine the attitude toward sexuality in Hasidism, and there I discovered expressions of extreme asceticism. But if, as I came to be convinced, Hasidism was radically ascetic on the question of sexuality, perhaps that was nevertheless an aberration, a sharp departure from the rabbinic traditions of the Talmud and the Middle Ages? And so I turned to these earlier sources, sometimes finding, again to my surprise, that things were quite different and often more complex than I had expected. Finally, I came to the Bible itself, the original Jewish source, and to ask whether the biblical discourse on sexuality had any connection with later developments.
In this circuitous, counterchronological fashion, the book gradually took shape over the course of more than a decade. My initial interest had been to describe the complicated, dialectical way in which Jewish culture negotiated the transition from the traditional world to modernity. But the further my research took me into the "traditional" world, the more skeptical I became that one could speak of a clean break between "traditional" and "modern." Instead, the modern period always seems to exist in dialectical relationship to its predecessors, and modern Jews define themselves in constant tension with their tradition, even if their knowledge of that tradition remains fragmentary. To do justice to the modern questions required extensive treatment of the tradition as a whole, going back to its very origins. Every attempt to discover the point of transition between tradition and modernity pushes the search further back in history, and ultimately these terms themselves dissolve and become increasingly unstable.
Yet another, even more personal quest prompted this "regressive" approach. As the son of a socialist Zionist father, I have always been curious about the personal dimensions of Zionism. From what I knew of my father's experience in the Zionist youth movement in the Poland of the 1920s, I was struck by the peculiar tension between eroticism and sublimation that characterized these idealistic young people, many of whom went on to found the State of Israel. After his death in July 1989, I chanced upon letters to and from my father, as well as a brief diary from the late 1920s and early 1930s that strikingly confirmed the ambivalence that I had found elsewhere.
But if indeed the relationship of Zionism to sexuality was one of ambivalence, how did this attitude derive from the Jewish culture of Eastern Europe out of which Zionism emerged? My attention turned to the renaissance of Hebrew literature at the end of the nineteenth century, and that, in turn, led me back to the Haskalah and then, in the fashion already described, farther and farther back into Jewish history. As I hope this study will show, there is a sense in which secular Zionism completed a grand circle with the very biblical, rabbinic, and medieval traditions against which it revolted.
Once I had completed the historical reconstruction of Jewish attitudes toward sexuality from the Bible to the early Zionist movement, Steven Fraser, my editor at Basic Books, pointed out that I had failed to close another circle: the connection between contemporary American Jewish culture and the earlier Jewish tradition. Chapter 9 is the product of that fruitful suggestion. Indeed, to close with the culture in which the author writes seems particularly appropriate to this subject and to the approach I have adopted. The very contention of historians that there is a history of sexuality is a product of contemporary culture, in which sexuality plays a central, if controversial, role. Since sexuality is a universal human experience, although one understood differently by every age and culture, it is virtually impossible to engage the past without the baggage of the present: like all modern men and women, the historian also struggles with his own sexuality. As I shall try to show in Chapter 9, to be a Jew in America today means, at least in part, to confront and attempt to understand oneself in terms of sexual relations both with other Jews and with non-Jews.
Instead of obscuring the contemporary questions that have compelled me to undertake this project, I have framed the book with them in the introduction and final chapter. Some will no doubt contend that these questions have led me tendentiously to choose certain sources and ignore others. To this charge, I plead guilty, but I believe that this is inevitable in all historical work. The story that I wish to tell is dictated to a large degree by contemporary concerns, but for author and readers alike, it cannot be otherwise. To write a history of Jewish sexuality means to place texts, many of them well known, into a radically new context, one that neither earlier historians nor the tradition itself might have anticipated. This history, like all histories, is not so much the discovery of facts or texts as it is the construction of a new way of looking at these "facts," a process that remakes them in its own image.
Next page