Dick Morris - Here Come the Black Helicopters!

WARNING: READING THIS BOOK AND ADOPTING ITS PREMISE MAY BE DANGEROUS TO YOUR REPUTATION AND LEAD TO CRITICISM AND RIDICULE FROM LIBERALS, GLOBALISTS, AND RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS.

BUT, UNDERSTAND THIS: IF THEY HAVE THEIR WAY, THE AMERICA WE KNOW AND LOVE WILL NO LONGER EXIST.

BECAUSE THEIR PLANS FOR GLOBAL GOVERNANCETHROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS AND ITS RELATED AGENCIESARE AT SERIOUS ODDS WITH OUR DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS, VALUES, AND LAWS.

WE MUST STOP THEM BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.

But what do the black helicopters refer to?

The term the black helicopter crowd has become a derisive liberal buzz phrase used to categorize those who question the movement for global governance. Anyone who believes that there are currently serious attempts to transfer American autonomy to the United Nations or to an international commission is a labeled as a kook, a conspiracy theorist, a member of the black helicopter crowd.

Of course, we dont believe that there are actual black helicopters on the way to conquer the United States. But we do believe that the term black helicopters is a useful metaphor to capture this attempt to erode our sovereignty by a network of United Nations treaties, codes, guidelines, and other resolutions. We think they have reached a critical mass and that it is time to stop them.

Thats what we mean by Here Come the Black Helicopters!

There is a genuine and growing threat to our freedom and autonomy as a nation.

Heres why: The folks at the United Nations and their globalist allies in the United States are determined to take away our national sovereignty. They dont want us to be an independent United States of Americathey want us to be just one of the many members of a United States of the World. And they want us to think of ourselves as citizens of the world, not just of the United States.

Make no mistake about it: They are deadly serious about this misguided proposition and theyre working night and day to make sure it happens.

Why? Because they think that our existing democratic system is outdated and obsolete in this modern globalized world. They want to replace it with what they believe is a more relevant and all-encompassing worldwide system for governing under the auspices of the United Nations. One that dilutes and negates the power of the United States of America. One that makes each country an equal, regardless of their productivity, population, or economic strength. Under their proposals Monaco, St. Kitts, and the United States would have equal voting power. The Lilliputians will rule the giants.

Thats their goal.

They call it global governance.

We call it the end of freedom. The day when the virtual black helicopters land.

And, believe us, in this case, they are out to create an alternate source of governanceone that we cannot control and one that is meant to homogenize the United States.

So, watch out, the black helicopters are metaphorically on the way.

Where did the name come from?

Well, decades ago, groups opposed to intrusive government actions and those who feared an attempt to create a new world orderwith a global governmentcomplained of surveillance by black helicopters, particularly in the western United States. Many of them feared that UN personnel were piloting the helicopters.

In the 1990s, Congresswoman Helen Chenoweth (R-ID) held hearings about the alleged use of black helicopters by the federal Fish & Wildlife Bureau to harass farmers and ranchers in her state. Apparently she was on to something. The Environmental Protection Agency recently admitted that it sanctions unannounced aerial surveillance fly-overs in order to monitor compliance with the Clean Water Act in the West.1

So now the phrase black helicopter crowd is used to paint as crackpots anyone who fears government intrusion and usurpation of our national government to a global entity.

The phrase is a favorite propaganda tool of some prominent liberals who use it whenever they want to mock conservatives.

In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on May 24, 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton taunted opponents of the controversial Law of the Sea Treaty (one of the top agenda items for the globalists): [Clinton] chided critics who object to the US joining any UN treaty saying, Of course, that means the black helicopters are on their way, a reference to conspiracy theories about a world government.2

Ironically, Clintons sarcastic remarks were strikingly close to the truth about what is actually happening in the worldwith one big exception. Theres no secret conspiracy to emasculate the US government and replace its power to govern and regulate with the United Nations and/or independent international commissions.

No, the intention to implement this brazen anti-American coup dtat is way out in the openright in front of our noses. All we need to do is connect the dots.

And thats what this book will do. Well discuss in detail exactly what moves are under way to lead us to global governance.

And its not just Hillary who pejoratively refers to the opponents of one world government. The New York Times recently used the term black helicopter crowd in a headline. On July 11, 2012, Eric Pfanner of the New York Times wrote an article titled The Black Helicopter crowd among American geeks has it wrong! He began his article with This just in from Geneva: The United Nations has no plans to seize control of the internet. The Web-snatching black helicopters have not left the hangar.3

But it turns out that it wasnt the black helicopter crowd who got it wrongit was the New York Times reporter, as well document below.

This book will expose the well-formulated scheme to achieve global governance, the plans to emasculate the United States.

The leftists, globalists, and radical environmentalists who advocate this new political alignment deny that they are trying to establish an international government. According to them, their utopian system for planetary decision making is most definitely not a plan for a one-world governmentits just a plan for global governance by many agencies and commissions on many issues. Is there really any difference? They also claim that global governance is definitely not meant to supersede nation-states or infringe on national sovereignty.

Dont believe them. Not for a minute. Just take a look at what they actually endorse. In 1995, the United Nations Commission on Global Governance published its final report, titled Our Global Neighborhood.4 This frightening document recommends, among other things:

Establishing an Economic Security Council to oversee worldwide economies

Authorizing the United Nations and its agencies to impose global taxes

Instituting a UN army

Terminating the veto power of the permanent members of the UN (which, of course, includes the US)

Creating an International Criminal Court

Creating a new body of the UN for civil society, where advocates for the environment, population control, etc., can play a role in policy making

Placing the authority for regulating the production and distribution of arms in the UN (gun control by another name)

Granting mandatory jurisdiction in the International Court of Justice for all members. (The US had not accepted this.)

Ceding jurisdiction over the global commons, such as oceans, space, and the environment, to the Trusteeship Council

Do those sound like the activities of a body that is