Ames - The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil
Here you can read online Ames - The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. publisher: University of Michigan Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Ames: author's other books
Who wrote The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Copyright by the University of Michigan 2001
All rights reserved
Published in the United States of America by
The University of Michigan Press
Manufactured in the United States of America
Printed on acid-free paper
2004 2003 2002 2001 4 3 2 1
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher.
A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Ames, Barry.
The deadlock of democracy in Brazil / Barry Ames.
p. cm. (Interests, identities, and institutions in comparative politics)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-472-11160-4 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-0-472-02143-7 (Electronic)
1. ElectionsBrazil. 2. Brazil. Congresso Nacional. 3. BrazilPolitics and government1985 I. Title. II. Series.
JL2492 .A44 2000
328.81dc21 00-064773
For Olivia and Michelle
One day in 1989, I heard that the municipal-level votes received by candidates for Brazilian congressional seats had been recorded on a computer tape. Though the tape included only the votes of winning candidates and covered just two elections in a handful of states, I thought the data might help me understand the workings of Brazil's unusual electoral system. One step led to another. The number of elections grew from two to five, coverage expanded to nearly the whole nation, and the behavior of the elected congressional candidates in subsequent legislatures became an integral part of the research program. The project ultimately took over a decade; fortunately, I already had tenure. Not surprisingly I accumulated a great many debts for the support, both personal and institutional, I received over this long period. I am too disorganized to remember them all, but here is a start.
For help on the most diverse aspects of electoral and legislative processes, both in Brazil and outside, I am grateful to Tim Power, David Fleischer, Shaun Bowler, David Samuels, Bolivar Lamounier, Amaury de Souza, Maria Antonia Alonso de Andrade, Glaucio Soares, Richard Foster, Maria Emilia Freire, Teresa Haguette, Joo Gilberto Lucas Coelho, Gilberto Dimenstein, Luiz Pedone, George Avelino Filho, Peter Kingstone, Maria D'Alva Kinzo, Robert Kaufman, Pedro Celso Cavalcanti, Valentina Rocha Lima, and Simone Rodrigues. The first two on this list, Tim and David, responded to hundreds of inquiries over the years of the project's duration.
In the early stages of electoral data gathering, I received help from Benedito dos Santos Gonalves, of SINDJUS. Jalles Marques helped me with data from Prodasen, the Senate's data processing office. As the years went by, the Tribunal Superior Eleitoral became the central repository of electoral data. I am especially grateful to Carlos Alberto Dornelles, Roberto Siqueira, Srgio, Flvio and Conceio.
The electoral mapping was done with Voyager, a geographic information systems program developed by Rudy Husar at the School of Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis. Rudy and Todd Oberman taught me how the program works.
My investigations into legislative behavior were aided by Orlando de Assis Baptista Neto, Geraldo Alckmin Filho, Eduardo Suplicy, Edwiges, Virgnia Mesquita, Murillo de Arago, Marcondes Sampaio, Rosinethe Monteiro Soares, Feichas Martins, Scott Desposato, and many deputies and aides.
Tim Power, David Samuels, Fabrice Lehoucq, and Scott Morgenstern read all or major parts of the entire manuscript and provided extremely useful comments. Bill Keech read everything and made detailed, line-by-line comments. The manuscript is enormously better for his effort. I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for the Press and for various journals who commented on the whole manuscript and on individual chapters. Even though I clearly have not met all their objections, they have made a huge contribution to the quality of the book.
In the study of individual policy areas, I benefited from conversations with Edlcio de Oliveira (INESC), Antonio Carlos Pojo do Rego, Lcio Reiner, Kurt Weyland, Paulo Kramer, Antonio Octvio Cintra and the permanent staff of the Chamber of Deputies, Eleutrio Rodriguez Neto, and Wendy Hunter.
Carmen Prez aided in the acquisition of critical documents in Braslia and helped me enjoy my long stay in the city. Michelle King spent many hours making sense of dusty documents in the Library of Congress. In Pittsburgh, Lcio Renno and Luciana Cozman provided able research assistance.
For counsel on the politics of individual states, I am grateful to Consuelo Novais Sampaio, Celina Souza, Samuel Celestino, and Gei Espinhara (Bahia); Paulo Freire Vieira and Moacyr Pereira (Santa Catarina); Antonio Lavareda and Jos Adalberto Pereira (Pernambuco); Antonio Carlos de Medeiros and Geert Banck (Esprito Santo); Agerson Tabosa Pinto, Aldenor Nunes Freire, Paulo Benavides, and Judith Tendler (Cear); Marcelo Baquero (Rio Grande do Sul); Clovis Borges and Denise Levy (Paran); Jardelino de Lucena Filho (Rio Grande do Norte); Maria Antonieta Parahyba Leopoldi (Rio de Janeiro); Jos de Ribamar Chaves Caldeira (Maranho); and Francisco Itam Campos (Gois). For help in linking micro- and macrophenomena, I often turned to two masters of the problem, Wallace and Gromit.
Without the enormous quantity of institutional support I received, the project could not have gone very far. In 1990 the National Science Foundation (award #8921805) supported my initial field research in Brazil. The IRIS Project at the University of Maryland (directed by Mancur Olson and Christopher Clague) and the North-South Center of the University of Miami supported the congressional phase of the research. In addition to my own interviews, Mauro Porto and Ftima Guimares (Department of Political Science, University of Braslia) and Clcio Dias (then of the University of Illinois, Urbana) conductedinterviews. Washington University, St. Louis, and the University of Pittsburgh provided support for summer trips. The American Philosophical Society contributed a travel grant. In 199596, I was a fellow of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. I am grateful to Joseph Tulchin for his support and to the entire staff of the Wilson Center for making that year the most enjoyable of my academic career.
To Michelle King, who produced our daughter Olivia, I owe a debt beyond words. Since Miss O is a lot more compelling than this book, it is fortunate that she was born when the book was essentially done.
PDC: Christian Democratic Party
PDS: Democratic Social Party. Successor to ARENA, the party backing the military regime, joined with the PDC to create the PPR.
PDT: Democratic Labor Party. Moderately left, led by populist politician Leonel Brizola, whose career began in the 194564 period.
PFL: Liberal Front Party. An outgrowth of the old PDS. Conservative, strongest in the Northeast. Has an ideologically neoliberal wing and a substantial wing of nonideological pork and patronage types.
PMDB: Party of the Brazilian Democratic Movement. Broad-based, center party that grew out of the Brazilian Democratic Movement. Began as the official opposition in the military regime. Plagued by frequent desertions but still the largest party in the Congress.
PPB: Brazilian Progressive Party. Conservative, created by merger of PPR and Progressive Party in 1995. The PPR was formed by the merger of the PDS and the Christian Democratic Party.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil»
Look at similar books to The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.