The Political Impossibility of Modern Counterinsurgency
Columbia Studies in Terrorism and Irregular Warfare
Columbia Studies in Terrorism and Irregular Warfare
BRUCE HOFFMAN, SERIES EDITOR
This series seeks to fill a conspicuous gap in the burgeoning literature on terrorism, guerrilla warfare, and insurgency. The series adheres to the highest standards of scholarship and discourse and publishes books that elucidate the strategy, operations, means, motivations, and effects posed by terrorist, guerrilla, and insurgent organizations and movements. It thereby provides a solid and increasingly expanding foundation of knowledge on these subjects for students, established scholars, and informed reading audiences alike.
Ami Pedahzur, The Israeli Secret Services and the Struggle Against Terrorism
Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger, Jewish Terrorism in Israel
Lorenzo Vidino, The New Muslim Brotherhood in the West
Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan, Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Resistance
William C. Banks, New Battlefields/Old Laws: Critical Debates on Asymmetric Warfare
Blake W. Mobley, Terrorism and Counterintelligence: How Terrorist Groups Elude Detection
Michael W. S. Ryan, The Deep Battle: Decoding Al-Qaedas Strategy: The Deep Battle Against America
David H. Ucko and Robert Egnell, Counterinsurgency in Crisis: Britain and the Challenges of Modern Warfare
Bruce Hoffman and Fernando Reinares, editors, The Evolution of the Global Terrorist Threat: From 9/11 to Osama bin Ladens Death
Boaz Ganor, Global Warning: The Rationality of Modern Islamist Terorism and the Challenge to the Liberal Democratic World
The Political Impossibility of Modern Counterinsurgency
Strategic Problems, Puzzles, and Paradoxes
M.L.R. SMITH
and DAVID MARTIN JONES
Columbia
University
Press
New York
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2015 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-53912-8
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Smith, M.L.R. (Michael Lawrence Rowan), 1963
The political impossibility of modern counterinsurgency : strategic problems, puzzles, and paradoxes / M. L. R. Smith and David Martin Jones.
pages cm. (Columbia studies in terrorism and irregular warfare)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-231-17000-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-231-53912-8 (e-book)
1. CounterinsurgencyHistory21st century. 2. TerrorismHistory21st century.
I. Jones, David Martin, 1950 II. Title.
U241.S64 2015
355.02'18dc23
2014025193
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
COVER DESIGN: Fifth Letter
COVER ART: The Noun Project, Creative Commons
References to websites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared.
Contents
I n many ways, this book represents the culmination of work on the relationship between strategy and violent nonstate actors stretching back the best part of three decades. The content of the chapters that have come to compose this volume has passed through many iterations, both verbal and written, over many years, beginning with doctoral research in the mid-1980s and extending to the teaching of courses on strategy and counterinsurgency, first at the National University of Singapore in the early 1990s, then at the Royal Naval College in the mid-1990s, and finally at Kings College London from the early 2000s. David Martin Jones and I thank the editors and reviewers of the following journals and periodicals for being receptive to our work throughout these years: International Affairs, Review of International Studies, Journal of Strategic Studies, Small Wars and Insurgencies, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, The World Today, and World Defence Systems. We are very grateful for their support. Likewise, we extend grateful appreciation to our friends and colleagues Celeste Ward Gventer and John Stone. Celeste provided acute insights into the U.S. policymaking world that would come to elevate counterinsurgency to a position of explicit importance in military and defense circles. From her skeptical and questioning approach, based on hard experience of the most troubled times during the Coalition occupation of Iraq, we learned much. John is a fine strategic theorist, and he undoubtedly helped refine many points of our thinking, thus enhancing the quality of the analysis in the following pages. We are very appreciative of all the excellent work that Anne Routon, Whitney Johnson, and the staff of Columbia University Press have put into commissioning the volume and bringing the manuscript to publication. We are particularly grateful to the anonymous readers who reviewed both the initial proposal and final manuscript for their many helpful insights and recommendations. Finally, we owe much thanks to Bruce Hoffman, the editor of the series in which this study appears, for his always pluralistic, open-handed approach to academic inquiry and his constant encouragement in supporting the publication of this volume.
MLRS
London
I still thought we had a good chance of turning things round merely by adjusting our counter-insurgency tactics, reflecting lessons learned in Malaya, Algeria, Vietnam or Northern Ireland, Sherard Cowper-Coles, the former British ambassador to Afghanistan, lamented. Although he started from the premise that counterinsurgency was a logical, historically proven set of understandings that confronted violent challenges to established authority and stabilized volatile regions, his experiences led him to recognize the constituting ambiguities in the notion of COIN, which once seemed to represent a magic panacea for the conduct of complex interventions in faraway places.
The Rise of COIN
The rise of modern counterinsurgency thinking begins with the events of September 11, 2001 (9/11), when members of the al-Qaeda jihadist network hijacked four airliners. The loss of nearly three thousand lives when two of the planes commandeered as weapons flew into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, while the third struck the Pentagon in Alexandria, Virginia, and the fourth crashed into a Pennsylvania field, defined the political contours of Western foreign policy for the succeeding decade. It was the events of the 9/11 era that saw counterinsurgency evolve as the seemingly logical response to this asymmetric threat.