• Complain

Culhane - The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations

Here you can read online Culhane - The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: British Columbia, year: 2014;2013, publisher: Talonbooks, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Culhane The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations
  • Book:
    The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Talonbooks
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014;2013
  • City:
    British Columbia
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Anthropologists have traditionally studied Europes others and the marginalized and excluded within Europes and North Americas boundaries. This book turns the anthropologists spyglass in the opposite direction: on the law, the institution that quintessentially embodies and reproduces Western power. The Pleasure of the Crown offers a comprehensive look at how Canadian, particularly British Columbian, society reveals itself through its courtroom performances in Aboriginal title litigation. Rather than asking what cultural beliefs and practices First Nations draw on to support their appeals for legal recognition of Aboriginal title, Culhane asks what assumptions, beliefs, and cultural values the Crown relies on to assert and defend their claims to hold legitimate sovereignty and jurisdiction over lands and resources in B.C. What empirical evidence does the Crown present to bolster its arguments? What can thus be learned by anthropologists and the public at large about the historical and contemporary culture of the powerful? Focusing in particular on the Gitksan and Wetsuweten case, the book traces the trial of Delgamuukw. v. Regina from its first hearing during 1987 and 1991 to its successful appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, which issued a landmark ruling on the case on December 11, 1997.

Culhane: author's other books


Who wrote The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

THE PLEASURE OF THE CROWN Anthropology Law and First Nations Dara Culhane - photo 1

THE PLEASURE OF THE CROWN
Anthropology, Law and First Nations

Dara Culhane

Talonbooks
1997

Copyright 1998 Dara Culhane

Published with the assistance of the Canada Council

Talon Books Ltd.
278 E 1st Ave.
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5T 1A6, Canada

First printing: January 1998
Electronic edition: 2014

On the cover: Mask of the Injustice System by David Neal
Cover design by Adam Swica

Talonbooks are distributed in Canada by General Distribution Services, 30 Lesmill Road, Don Mills, Ontario, Canada M3B 2T6; Tel.:(416) 445-3333; Fax:(416) 445-5967.

Talonbooks are distributed in the U. S. A. by General Distribution Services Inc., 85 Rock River Drive, Suite 202, Buffalo, New York, U.S.A. 14207-2170; Tel.:1-800-805-1083; Fax:1-800-481-6207.

No part of this book, covered by the copyright hereon, may be reproduced or used in any form or by any meansgraphic, electronic or mechanicalwithout prior permission of the publisher, except for excerpts in a review. Any request for photocopying of any part of this book shall be directed in writing to Cancopy (Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency), 6 Adelaide Street East, Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 1H6, Tel.:(416) 868-1620; Fax:(416) 868-1621.

Cataloguing data available from Library and Archives Canada

ISBN: 978-0-88922-864-1

for feral travelers in the vast emptiness


in memory of my mother
Claire Eglin Culhane
1918-1996
who never failed
to speak truth to power

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Generalized map of British Columbia showing Territories claimed by Gitksan and - photo 2

Generalized map of British Columbia showing Territories claimed by Gitksan and Wetsuweten Peoples (not to scale).

PART I

JUSTITIA OMNIBUS

(JUSTICE FOR ALL)

Chapter 1: How Did the Crown Acquire Title?

The Indian elders in British Columbia question why they must subject their relationship to the land to a non-Indian courts strict scrutiny: why they must explain their use of the land to obtain rights abstractly defined by others.

They believe that the Indians have rights to their land because their people go back with the land for thousands of years. What they do not understand is how the Crown acquired its rights to their land.

Lawyer Louise Mandell, 1987, Native Culture on Trial.

The Long and the Short of It

Law, we are taught to believe by our educational institutions, embodies justice. Our courts formal rules of evidence, and their procedures, enable the discovery of truth through the application of reason. Judicial neutralitythe absence of bias among judgesguarantees that fair and equitable resolutions to disputes between any and all people(s) will be arrived at. Equality before the law, we are told, is the linchpin of the Canadian judicial system; and justice, we are assured, is the outcome of legal processes. It follows from these official premises, and by this reasoning, that if contemporary Canadian sovereignty and Crown title and rights to land are confirmed by law, they must have been justly acquired.

Of course, in these cynical times, few claim the Canadian legal system is infallible. Charges that interests other than the pursuit of justice may be at play in legal processes do not usually generate widespread alarm. Increasingly, we understand that what we call facts are frequently matters of interpretation that reflect particular points of view rather than unequivocal certainty. We have come to appreciate that something called culture, and more specifically, cultural differences, come between Aboriginal peoples and Canadian law, disrupting communication and mutual understanding. Suggestions that judges decisions often reflect prejudices common in contemporary society at large, rather than being strictly determined by exclusively legal concerns, are hardly shocking revelations.

However, periodically a particular judicial decision comes to public attention that shocks even the most complacent or embittered cynic. Allan McEachern, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, created just such a controversy when he handed down his 1991 judgment against the Aboriginal claimants in the high profile Gitksan land rights case, also known as the case of Delgamuukw v. The Queen. Judge McEachern ruled that, before Europeans arrived in the late eighteenth century, the First Nations had been too primitive to have had property laws or institutions of governance. Today, he declared, they have no Aboriginal rights whatsoever. Charges of racism were hurled at the judge. He was accused of shamelessly favouring the interests of big forestry companies and non-Aboriginal elites against the rights of First Nations. The Chief Justice defended himself, using the letter of the law as his shield. He protested that he was compelled by historical precedents to repeat the rulings of previous judges that dated back hundreds of years. Chief Justice McEachern admitted that his decision might not be just, but he was convinced that it was definitely legal.

Indeed, law and justice have not always walked hand in hand through British Columbias history, and nowhere is the distance between them greater than on the question of Aboriginal title and rights. How did the British Crown acquire its rights to the territory we now call British Columbia? Many Canadians would respond, with pride, that unlike Americans, we gained sovereignty over the lands we live on, and established political jurisdiction over its Indigenous inhabitants, through the rule of law, rather than by military force.

In fact, the Crown acquired its title to First Nations lands and resources by simply asserting sovereignty and ignoring Aboriginal title in contravention of British colonial law. British and then Euro-Canadian rule was enacted by sheer force of numbers as settlers overwhelmed fragments of Aboriginal populations who had survived the first waves of epidemic diseases brought by European fur traders during the eighteenth century. Aboriginal peoples were simply deemed, by law, not to exist. The colonists then established their own legal regime that validated their self-proclaimed sovereignty and jurisdiction. For over 100 years, the governments and the courts of the Province of British Columbia have defended their predecessors initial trespass on Aboriginal lands, and their transgression of British law, by whatever means necessary: coercion, deceit, compromise, seduction, force. Law.

Aboriginal peoples have steadfastly insisted that they surrendered neither ownership of their lands, nor their political autonomy. Nor did they cease to exist. However, it was not until the late 1960s that First Nationsafter over a century of petitioningsucceeded in compelling Canadian courts to begin adjudicating their disputes with the governments about who owns the land in British Columbia.

When called upon to justify its actions in law, the Province of British Columbia retreats to a legal fortress, the cornerstone of which is the mystical original moment when Britain asserted sovereignty over First Nations in British Columbia, often without their knowledge, and always without their consent. The Crowns defense begins by giving legal sanction to this crude act of aggression, and then proceeds from this starting point to call upon a range of social theories, historical fictions, and popular common sense ignorance and prejudice to justify its actions. Crown lawyers present as evidence stereotypical caricatures of Aboriginal peoples as backward and primitive when Europeans arrived. Grisly tales of war-like savages are juxtaposed with an heroic epic of advanced and civilized white settlers who, it is claimed, brought Christianity, reason, and the rule of law to the untamed wilderness of British Columbia. The stark contrast in development between the two races, the Crown argues, made the superimposition of British sovereignty over Aboriginal sovereignty a natural outcome of the progress of history, and rendered inevitable the subordination of Aboriginal peoples to non-Aboriginal governance. A short answer to the Aboriginal elders question is that the Crown acquired its rights to their land by simply seizing it: through the force of law.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations»

Look at similar books to The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations»

Discussion, reviews of the book The pleasure of the Crown: anthropology, law and First Nations and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.