• Complain

William Beaver - Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa

Here you can read online William Beaver - Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Biteback Publishing, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

William Beaver Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa
  • Book:
    Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Biteback Publishing
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Delving into an encyclopaedic array of little-known primary sources, William Beaver uncovers a vigorous intelligence function at the heart of Victorias Empire. A cadre of exceptionally able and dedicated officers, they formed the War Office Intelligence Division, which gave Britains foreign policy its backbone in the heyday of imperial acquisition.

Under Every Leaf is the first major study to examine the seminal role of intelligence gathering and analysis in Englands era. So well did Great Britain play her hand, it seemed to all the world that, as the Farsi expression goes, Anywhere a leaf moves, underneath you will find an Englishman.

The historian William Beaver is also a soldier, corporate communicator, arts editor and Anglican priest.

William Beaver: author's other books


Who wrote Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
16-18 Queen Annes Gate home of British military intelligence between 1884 and - photo 1

16-18 Queen Annes Gate, home of British military intelligence between 1884 and 1901. Two Wyatt townhouses knocked together, they were deceptively commodious. At this period, some thirty to forty personnel were assigned there, the library was on the ground floor and the presses were in the filthy basement. In 1901 the ID moved to Winchester House, St Jamess Square. London Metropolitan Archives

To those who from their own experience and scholarship suspected that something must have been going on, including Sir Isaiah Berlin, OM of Wolfson College; Brigadier Sir Edgar Williams, CB, CBE, DSO of Rhodes House; Professor Ronald Robinson, CBE, DFC, Beit Professor of Commonwealth History and Dr Colin Newbury, University Lecturer in Commonwealth History. You were right.

Dated July 1882 this simple tactical map for both military and naval forces - photo 2

Dated July 1882, this simple tactical map for both military and naval forces was probably completed by May as part of the IDs preparation for the Egyptian expeditionary force. Although strategic and boundary maps made up the regular output of the ID mapping room, Alexandria is an early example of the up-to-date tactical maps regularly produced by the ID from the mid-1870s for deploying forces. National Archives

CONTENTS F or originally suggesting the study of British intelligence in - photo 3
CONTENTS F or originally suggesting the study of British intelligence in - photo 4
CONTENTS

F or originally suggesting the study of British intelligence in the scramble for Africa I am grateful to Dr Colin Newbury of Linacre College, Oxford. The subject grew in many different directions and the number of people to which I am indebted is correspondingly large, indeed, more than I can name. My debt to them all is real and deep. I am particularly grateful to those whom I have dedicated this work. Likewise the staff of the then Public Record Office (now National Archives), especially Mr M. D. Lea, Ms Veronica Graham-Green and the redoubtable ladies who patiently provided me with an endless stream of dusty tomes from their subterranean mine and rejoiced, no doubt with relief, when we eventually stumbled upon the right seam. In my gratitude I gladly include the helpful staffs of the National Army Museum, Royal Commonwealth Library, English Heritage, the London Metropolitan Archives, Rhodes House of the Bodleian Library, the Royal United Services Institution, and the British Museum.

Justly deserving of inadequate thanks, too, are Dr D. W. King, OBE, FLA and Mr C. A. Potts, ALA and the hard-pressed staff of the Ministry of Defence Library (Central and Army). Despite severe organisational pressures at the time, of which I was then only dimly aware, they welcomed me, lent me an office overlooking Horse Guards and gave me free rein of what was then a most remarkable collection.

Likewise, my thanks go to Ms L. E. Forbes, ALA and Ms Clarice Bates of the Oriental Library, University of Durham, who cheerfully gave me every possible assistance with the Sudan Archive as did the Duchess of Devonshire, Major T. S. Wragg, MBE, TD and Mr Peter Day with the Hartington Collection at Chatsworth House. In Oxford, Mr J. Wing and the staff of Christ Church Library opened the Salisbury Collection to me without let or hindrance and in an act of remarkable generosity Mr J. Browning of Maggs Bros withdrew a collection of diaries from sale until I could examine them.

So, too, the early historians of the Intelligence Corps of the British Army deserve my gratitude: Colonel Brian Parritt, MBE, Lieutenant Colonel W. W. Leary, BEM, Major Jock Haswell and Mr H. A. Hunter who greeted me as a colleague and guest on several occasions. Colonels J. E. South and E. E. Peel, RE and the staff of the Royal Engineer Library kindly admitted me to their mess and most important library as did Major R. G. StG Bartelot, RA and the Royal Artillery Museum.

Without the material assistance of the trustees of the Beit Foundation through the award of the Beit Senior Scholarship in the university, progress on this work would have been much affected. I am grateful to them and for the very real help from the Sudanese scholar Professor Richard Hill, General Sir James Marshall-Cornwall, CBE, DSO, Kenneth and Lynn Cunningham, David and Grizelda Vermont, Richard and Tam Frost, Sir Ronald Wingate, CB, CMG, CIE, OBE and the many descendants of the men I studied whom I plagued for papers or information about their forebears.

In bringing this work to publication I am grateful for the encouragement of Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield, FBA; and of Michael Smith, the acknowledged doyen of later British intelligence history, and Sean Magee of Biteback Publishing, who from the first has given the author the most wise and valued encouragement. He and the dynamic Biteback team have been a delight to work with. My long-suffering family I also mention with thanks and end with the standard yet heart-felt declaration that whilst praise belongs to the named and unnamed above, any opprobrium for the inevitable errors and omissions I reserve for myself alone.

William Beaver

Wolfson College, Oxford

I n the mid-nineteenth century, the world was ripe to be possessed by the powerful. Russias steady subversion of Bulgar and Afghan alike, and her mysterious successes in the south, masked by distance and played over little-known lands, caused disquiet in London and blind worry in Calcutta. Later the threat would come from France, Germany, Portugal and even Italy, all passionate in their desire to expand into Africa. Behind every move was the threat of armed force against the most successful of colonial powers: Great Britain.

Yet Britain desired to live in a parallel universe of progress, freedom and peace. And, on the whole, this is the grand story of the second half of Victorias reign. But it could only exist in the world it wanted to live in if it listened for, absorbed and used to advantage intelligence about potential foes and their tricks, knavish or otherwise. Britain could never win at shadow boxing and its magnificent navy was, when all was said and done, of little use away from the waters edge. In more subtle ways, however, Britain could combat that which she could detect and the result was that for well over half a century Britain was not involved in nor suffered from either a great European or a great Asian war. Britain played her cards well because she sat facing the mirror.

But who sat facing the mirror? Britains diplomatic machinery was almost powerless to collect the right information, analyse it enough to turn it into intelligence or propose courses of action based on what it found in an increasingly complex world. To fill the vacuum, the governments of the day drew heavily on the experience and technical expertise of the little-known Intelligence Department (from 1888 the Intelligence Division) or ID of the War Office. In short, the ID was useful to the politicians and great offices of state because it replaced conjecture with studied analysis.

Initially, ministers and their officials came to rely on the Division because it was convenient. If they did not agree, they could dismiss the IDs opinions with a polite Read and noted. After all, it was but a separate, innocuous subunit which printed maps and dealt with strange places and even stranger people. From the beginning it was estranged from its notional overlords, the generals at Horse Guards, and on the surface carried no organisational clout. So, if they chose, the government could ignore the Division and its advice. But just the opposite happened and the young captains and majors with experience and expertise beyond their years wrote far-reaching memoranda which affected policy and the lives of millions. As the century drew to a close, an increasing number of Foreign, Colonial and Indian Office minutes ended with: Presume you have asked the ID? And back would come the answer: Done.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa»

Look at similar books to Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa»

Discussion, reviews of the book Under Every Leaf: How Britain Played the Greater Game from Afghanistan to Africa and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.