Radical Nomad
Great Barrington Books
An imprint edited by Charles Lemert
Keeping Good Time: Reflections on Knowledge,
Power, and People
by Avery F. Gordon (2004)
Going Down for Air: A Memoir in Search of a Subject
by Derek Sayer (2004)
The Souls of Black Folk, 100th Anniversary Edition
by W. E. B. Du Bois, with commentaries by Manning Marable,
Charles Lemert, and Cheryl Townsend Gilkes (2004)
Sociology After the Crisis, Updated Edition
by Charles Lemert (2004)
Subject to Ourselves
by Anthony Elliot (2004)
The Protestant Ethic Turns 100:
Essays on the Centenary of the Weber Thesis
edited by William H. Swatos, Jr., and Lutz Kaelber (2005)
Postmodernism Is Not What You Think
by Charles Lemert (2005)
Discourses on Liberation: An Anatomy of Critical Theory
by Kyung-Man Kim (2005)
Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action
by Harold Garfinkel, edited and introduced
by Anne Warfield Rawls (2005)
The Souls of W. E. B. Du Bois
by Alford A. Young, Jr., Manning Marable,
Elizabeth Higginbotham, Charles Lemert, and
Jerry G. Watts (2006)
Radical Nomad: C. Wright Mills and His Times
by Tom Hayden with Contemporary Reflections by
Stanley Aronowitz, Richard Flacks, and Charles Lemert (2006)
Critique for What? Cultural Studies, American Studies, Left Studies
by Joel Pfister (2006)
Everyday Life and the State
by Peter Bratsis (2006)
Thinking the Unthinkable:
An Introduction to Social Theories
by Charles Lemert (2007)
Radical Nomad
C. Wright Mills and
His Times
by Tom Hayden
Contemporary Reflections by Dick Flacks,
Stanley Aronowitz, and Charles Lemert
First published 2006 by Paradigm Publishers
Published 2016 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 2006, Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Hayden, Tom.
Radical nomad: C. Wright Mills and his times / Tom Hayden; with contemporary reflection by Stanley Aronowitz, Richard Flacks, and Charles Lemert.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-1-59451-201-8 (hc 13)
ISBN-10: 1-59451-201-9 (hc 10)
ISBN-13: 978-1-59451-202-5 (pbk 13)
ISBN-10: 1-59451-202-7 (pbk 10)
1. Mills, C. Wright (Charles Wright), 19161962Political and social views.
2. Mills, C. Wright (Charles Wright), 19161962Influence. 3. Radicalism
United States. 4. New LeftUnited States. 5. Sociology. 6. United States
Social conditions1945- I. Aronowitz, Stanley. II. Flacks, Richard. III. Lemert,
Charles C., 1937-IV. Title.
HM479.M55H39 2006
301.092dc22
2006001599
Designed and Typeset by Straight Creek Bookmakers.
ISBN 13: 978-1-59451-201-8 (hbk)
ISBN 13: 978-1-59451-202-5 (pbk)
Contents
by Dick Flacks
by Stanley Aronowitz
by Charles Lemert
, by Tom Hayden
C. Wright Mills, Tom Hayden,
and the New Left
Dick Flacks
T OM HAYDEN WROTE HIS M.A. THESIS WHILE HE WAS INtensely engaged in the leadership of the early sixties New Left. He wrote it after returning to graduate school in Ann Arbor, having graduated from Michigan in 1961.
Hayden, at age twenty-two, was already a prime mover in the creation of the sixties. In the summer of 1960, as the newly appointed editor in chief of the Michigan Daily, he traveled to California to witness the emerging student movement in Berkeley, the beginnings of farmworker organizing in the California fi elds, and the nomination of JFK at the Democratic convention in LA (where he interviewed Martin Luther King as he picketed the convention arena). In his year as student editor, Hayden traveled in the South, documenting and helping the rising southern student movement. He wrote long, prescient articles describing and helping define what he saw as an authentic new student movement.
After graduating, Hayden decided to commit himself to that movement as an activist and as a writer. He traveled in the South, getting to know the young civil rights leadership, getting beaten in Mississippi, getting married to an eloquent and beautiful white Texas civil rights activist, Sandra Cason (Casey). At the same time, he agreed to join Al Haber and other Ann Arborites to help launch Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a national organization aimed at fostering the new movement. His first big job for SDS was to draft a manifesto to be debated at the SDS founding meeting at Port Huron, Michigan, in June. The Port Huron Statement is acknowledged to be the foundational document of the New Left in the United States.
Hayden was elected SDS president at that Port Huron meeting and decided to come back to Ann Arbor with Casey Hayden to establish an SDS office there, while enrolling in the political science graduate program. I dont know whether any of the political science faculty had reservations about Haydens capacity to complete an M.A. while indefatigably organizing, traveling, speaking, and writing on behalf of the movement. I imagine that any reservations were balanced by the obvious fact that this twenty-two-year-old was so brilliant, so intense, and so promising that he deserved to be supported. The book-length masters thesis that he produced certainly validated the decision to admit him.1
We need to read the work in its historical context in order to understand Haydens angle of vision. It was being composed in the heat of the southern movement and while its author was actively engaged in efforts to inspire a burgeoning white student movement that would extend the potentials of the southern student uprising. It was a time when established understandings about the stability of the social order were crumblingand when socially conscious young people were feeling hope about both the social future and their own potential for affecting it.
Keep in mind as well that this essay was written before the major shaping events that now define the sixties for us: before the Berkeley free speech movement (or any other sign of the possibility that masses of white students would take action), before Vietnam, before the ghetto uprisings. It captures reflections appropriate to a particular moment in a time of tumultuous change. Given that, I was surprised, in rereading it, by how valuable it continues to be forty years later.
Millss New Left
C. Wright Mills was hungry for a new Left long before the sixties. By the 1950s, he was openly, angrily critical of the old Leftnot just the Marxist/Trotskyist sectarian Left that many of his generation disdained, but the broader liberal Left that he saw as exhausted programmatically and accommodating to the cold war consensus in many ways. In pamphlets and articles written in the late 1950s, we see him arguing for organized and strategic dissent based on new social understandings, language, and agency. More than any other figure in the U.S. political/intellectual scene, he was trying, in the peak cold war time, to foster the possibility for a new Left not only by seeking it but by trying to constitute its intellectual foundations.