ROUTLEDGE LIBRARY EDITIONS: TELEVISION
Volume 14
THE FUTURE OF BROADCASTING
THE FUTURE OF BROADCASTING
A Report presented to The Social Morality Council, October 1973
SOCIAL MORALITY COUNCIL
First published in 1974
This edition first published in 2013
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada
by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
1974 Social Morality Council
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-0-415-82199-5 (Set)
eISBN: 978-0-203-51517-4 (Set)
ISBN: 978-0-415-83994-5 (Volume 14)
eISBN: 978-0-203-76895-2 (Volume 14)
Publisher's Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and would welcome correspondence from those they have been unable to trace.
THE FUTURE OF BROADCASTING
A Report presented to
The Social Morality Council
October 1973
First published 1974
1974 by the Social Morality Council
Printed in Great Britain for
Eyre Methuen Ltd
11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE
by Butler & Tanner Ltd
Frome and London
ISBN 0 413 31140 6
This edition is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION
Dame Margaret Miles | Dipak Nandy |
(Chairman) | Joslyn G. Owen |
Dame Elizabeth Ackroyd | Stella Richman |
Agneilus Andrew, O.F.M. | Jean Rowntree |
Catherine Avent | John Scupham |
Dr Jay G. Blumler | Jack Straw |
Dr Jeremy Bray | The Rt Rev. Oliver Tomkins |
The Rt Hon. Lord Brown | Oliver Whitley |
Dame Anne Bryans | John Harriott, S.J. |
Sir Ronald Gould | (Rapporteur) |
Alan Hill, C.B.E. | Janet M. Mortimer |
The Rev. Douglas Hubery | (Secretary) |
Observers |
Ian Alexander | Foreign and Commonwealth Office |
L. J. Burrows, O.B.E. | Department of Education and Science |
Col. Robert Hornby, O.B.E. |
Dennis Lawrence, O.B.E. | Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications |
Edward Oliver | Secretary General, Social Morality Council |
Members of the Commission took part in their individual capacities and not as representatives of organisations.
The Social Morality Council was
founded in 1969 to foster mutual
understanding between religious
believers and non-believers, and to
undertake joint studies of major
social issues in the light of ethical
values.
Address: 17 York House
London W8 4EY
CONTENTS
This Report, commissioned by the Social Morality Council. in 1972, is offered as a modest contribution to public debate on the future of broadcasting. The SMC initiative was taken at that time partly because the Charter of the BBC and the Act which established the IB A were thought to be due for renewal and revision in 1976. The Government has since postponed the date to 1981, but this decision does not diminish the need for informed public debate; indeed, though the Government still does not intend to set up a full-scale inquiry, the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications has invited opinions and suggestions on such questions as the use of the Fourth Channel and regional broadcasting needs. The postponed date has in fact increased the opportunity for constructive debate.
Our Report has no official blessing or sponsorship, and has no pretensions to be a substitute for the sort of wide-ranging inquiry the Government has commissioned in the past; it is merely an attempt by a few interested lay people to make a socially and morally responsible examination of some of the important questions which issue from broadcasting (particularly television). As might be expected, we did not always agree about everything but on many basic issues there was a remarkable consensus.
Time and resources have been limited, but what we had were used well. In the course of our meetings over a period of nine months we heard evidence from, and had full and interesting discussions with, many experts in the field of broadcasting.
The members of the Commission were invited to serve as private individuals and not as representatives of organisations. Every attempt was made to embrace differing views and varied professional expertise. Such balance was not easy to achieve (after all, everyone is involved to some extent in broadcasting) and it changed according to the pattern of acceptance and the ability of members to attend meetings. The group as finally constituted included some people who had worked voluntarily or professionally in broadcasting, others who had no direct experience except as viewers and listeners. No member was currently directly involved in either of the broadcasting organisations or in Government.
We hope that the Report will be widely read; it therefore includes a considerable amount of information which will be familiar to people within the industry, but which to many of us was new and of absorbing interest.
The experience of trying to take an overall view of such an enormous field has been daunting but stimulating and exciting. Although we deliberately excluded a number of issues external services, religious broadcasting, which is being dealt with fully by the Church of England Report, conditions of employment, which is included in the Report prepared by the ACTT we have been constantly aware of the impossibility of covering the ground or of doing justice to our subject with the limited resources at our disposal.
We have received most generous cooperation from the BBC and the IBA, and are most grateful to those many people who have met us and talked with us in so frank and friendly a way. We have also had most helpful assistance from the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications.