Bertelsmann Stiftung - Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World?

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World? — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World?" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...24

Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek

The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the
Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data
is available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.

2010 E-Book-Ausgabe (EPUB) 2006 Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gtersloh

Responsible: Dr. Volker Then
Copy editor: Heike Herrberg
Production editor: Christiane Raffel
Cover design: Nadine Humann
Cover illustration: PhotoDisc
Typesetting and Print: Hans Kock Buch- und Offsetdruck GmbH, Bielefeld

ISBN : 978-3-86793-237-0

www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/verlag

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Preface

The Philanthropy and Foundations division of the Bertelsmann Stiftung aims at an effective and efficient foundation sector. Our projects have focused on donor information, donor learning and innovative philanthropic vehicles such as community foundations as well as issues of foundation governance and management.

The Bertelsmann Stiftung invited an international group of participants from both academia and innovative social-investment organizations to its Foundation Management Symposium 2005. The debate was organized around the issues of effectiveness, efficiency and accountability and was held in a thoroughly interactive conference format. Foundations are not unique in many of the challenges they face, but they operate in an environment in which leverage and risk taking under conditions of market uncertainty remain key. They are usually small players compared to the problems they address, and their smallness requires particular care in their strategic thinking. At the symposium, brief impulse statements initiated round-table discussions on the philanthropic market as part of the third sector, strategic leverage, efficient resource allocation, and public expectations toward the accountability of charitable foundations. In particular, we raised the question whether foundations could learn from the corporate world in addressing these issues (and vice versa).

This volume documents the proceedings of the conference. The first contribution is an editorial overview of the debate, for the following contributions authors have elaborated their short impulse statements to the symposium. The contributions are more like essayistic reflections than academic papers, and their character has not been changed.

The transfer of knowledge from a corporate to a philanthropic background is difficult but still has its merits. Even participants from business schools agreed that the market could be seen only as a metaphor in philanthropic contexts because the actual functioning of resource allocations lacks the efficiency and smoothness of a market. Nonprofit organizations in general and foundations in particular have to bear comparatively high transaction costs when they try to establish information on their field and transparency in their spheres of interest. When deciding on their allocations, foundation leaders cannot rely only on simple mechanisms of return on investment. They have to bear in mind more complex frameworks for their decision making that are defined by a multiplicity of variables which in addition are characterized by normative interpretations. However, this very complexity of decision-making under conditions of uncertainty may be of interest to the corporate world. In addition, the legitimacy advantages of foundations in society may be of interest to corporations.

I would like to thank all the speakers and contributors to our debate for their input. I wish you a stimulating reading experience and hope that you will share our interest in improving professional thinking within our sector.

Dr. Brigitte Mohn
Member of the Board of Management
Bertelsmann Stiftung
Gtersloh, February 2006

1. Key Issues in Foundation Management

Heribert Meffert, Volker Then, Nina Fritsch

1.1 The Role of Foundations in Society-What Market Are We in?

In recent years, the controversy over the relationship between the state, the economy and civil society has achieved a new dynamic. It is clear that, increasingly, the state is unable to assume responsibility for all spheres of life, and the limitations of the market are becoming obvious. Consequently, the significance of civil society will increase within this power triangle. Both politically and economically, as a highly independent part of the nonprofit sector, foundations are vitally important in an era of smaller government, social diversity and greater reliance on private action for the public benefit.

The question arises as to how foundations can justify their privileged position in society, and not only with respect to taxation. Resentment and criticism can be perceived to an increasing degree among certain groups. They argue that foundations are antidemocratic institutions serving public purposes, but oriented toward the motives and goals of individual private founders. Furthermore, they are suspected of plutocracy, and without a doubt, their founding requires substantial capital.

Initially, it might be argued that foundations correct the errors of society, because they respond to the needs of minorities and therefore strengthen rather than compromise democracy. However, overall, the privileges accruing to foundations arise from their ability to maximize their potential and therefore their impact. Achieving maximum impact is tied to two conditions.

The first is the ability of a foundation to fill an appropriate role in society that corresponds with its targets and complements the functions of other players in the foundations relevant markets. This is because the complexity of social problems that foundations face is such that their resolution is never in the hands of a single actor. This is particularly so if the actors, just like foundations, do not have the resources commensurate with the problem at hand. Second, the implementation of effective and efficient processes (that is, good management) is also essential.

As regards the role of foundations in society, conventional philanthropy over the decades has changed. As the first approach and original model of philanthropy, charity in many ways was well-suited to the social and political context of the nineteenth century. Foundations provided services to those in need, acting as a complement to the government. Until the beginning of the twentieth century, this approach was probably effective, yet it still had its defects. Its major shortcoming was that it makes a difference to those lucky enough to benefit directly from the service but, taken alone, has no impact beyond that if there are not many of the lucky few. The approach addresses symptoms rather than causes.

As a new approach to foundation management in the early to mid-twentieth century, philanthropy emphasized dealing with causes rather than symptoms. There was a strong belief in the power of a scientific approach as a concept of social engineering. Regardless of its achievements, this approach suffers from weaknesses when viewed from a present-day perspective. First, it completely fails to exploit the unique potential of endowed foundations. Second, it rests on assumptions that hold true for physical science, but not necessarily in the context of social issues. Even if the causes of poverty, for example, were identifiable, they would not necessarily be susceptible to scientific solutions. Finally, while the philanthropic approach has a much wider potential impact, if often fails to appreciate the complex and extensive nature of effective problem solving.

Next page

1234567...24

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World?»

Look at similar books to Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World?. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

Theo N.M. Schuyt

Philanthropy and the Philanthropy Sector: An Introduction

John V. Kania

Do More Than Give: The Six Practices of Donors Who Change the World

Abdul Ghafar Ismail

Islamic Philanthropy: Exploring Zakat, Waqf, and Sadaqah in Islamic Finance and Economics

Jessica Sklair

Brazilian Elites and Their Philanthropy: Wealth at the Service of Development

Thorup

Pro Bono?

Einstein

Compassion, Inc.: how corporate America blurs the line between what we buy, who we are, and those we help

Lonneke Roza

Handbook on Corporate Foundations: Corporate and Civil Society Perspectives

Triant G. Flouris

Risk Management and Corporate Sustainability in Aviation

Howard A. Husock

Philanthropy Under Fire

Linsey McGoey

No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy

Olivier Zunz

Philanthropy in America : a history

Reynold Levy

Give and take: a candid account of corporate philanthropy

Discussion, reviews of the book Effectiveness, Efficiency and Accountability in Philanthropy: What Lessons can be Learned from the Corporate World? and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.