Copyright 2013 by Noam Chomsky and Laray Polk
A Seven Stories Press First Edition
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including mechanical, electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Seven Stories Press
140 Watts Street
New York, NY 10013
www.sevenstories.com
College professors may order examination copies of Seven Stories Press titles for a free six-month trial period. To order, visit http://www.sevenstories.com/textbook or send a fax on school letterhead to (212) 226-1411.
Book design by Elizabeth DeLong
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Chomsky, Noam.
Nuclear war and environmental catastrophe / Noam Chomsky and Laray Polk. -- 1st ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-60980-454-1 (pbk.)
1. Nuclear warfare--Environmental aspects. 2. Environmental disasters. I. Polk, Laray. II. Title.
QH545.N83C56 2013
363.3255--dc23
2012046137
Printed in the United States
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
Preface
If humans choose to work to minimize the existential threats of our time, perhaps the most improbable aspect of remedy is that we will accept modalities based on collaboration and creative adaptation, rather than perpetual combat and domination. Consensual science on climate change presents another fact: we may only have a few years to make adjustments in the collective carbon load before we are faced with irreversible consequences. As Christian Parenti in Tropic of Chaos perceptively and correctly points out:
[E]ven if all greenhouse gas emissions stopped immediatelythat is, if the world economy collapsed today, and not a single light bulb was switched on nor a single gasoline-powered motor started ever againthere is already enough carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to cause significant warming and disruptive climate change, and with that considerably more poverty, violence, social dislocation, forced migration, and political upheaval. Thus we must find humane and just means of adaptation, or we face barbaric prospects.
Seen in this light, to live collaboratively and creatively is less a radical proposal than a pragmatic one, if we, future generations, and the biosphere are to survive nuclear war and environmental catastrophe.
Laray Polk
Dallas, Texas
September 2012
Footnotes:
To the worlds military leaders, the debate over climate change is long over. They are preparing for a new kind of Cold War in the Arctic, anticipating that rising temperatures there will open up a treasure trove of resources, long-dreamed-of sea lanes and a slew of potential conflicts. Eric Talmadge, As Ice Cap Melts, Militaries Vie for Arctic Edge, Associated Press, April 16, 2012. Areas of future hostilities over oil include the Strait of Hormuz, South China Sea, and Caspian Sea basin. Michael T. Klare, Danger Waters: The Three Top Hot Spots of Potential Conflict in the Geo-Energy Era, TomDispatch.com, January 10, 2012. On drilling in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas, see note 3, chap. 1.
In 2005, while deep-water drilling in Angola, an Exxon spokesperson said, All the easy oil and gas in the world has pretty much been found. Now comes the harder work in finding and producing oil from more challenging environments and work areas. This is proved to be true as the new frontiers of unconventional oil (Arctic offshore, oil sands, oil shale, pre-salt deepwater, tight oil) involve extreme environmental risk in sensitive areas such as the boreal forest and the worlds oceans. Based on BPs data, the estimated time span of the world proved [oil] reserves in meeting current demand is forty-six years. John Donnelly, Price Rise and New Deep-Water Technology Opened Up Offshore Drilling, Boston Globe , December 11, 2005; Mark Finley, The Oil Market to 2030Implications for Investment and Policy, Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1, no. 1 (2012): 28, doi: 10.5547/2160-5890.1.1.4.
Christian Parenti, Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence (New York: Nation Books, 2011), 226.
Abbreviations
ACHRE: Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
AEC: Atomic Energy Commission
ALEC: American Legislative Exchange Council
API: American Petroleum Institute
ARPA-E: Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy
BIOT: British Indian Ocean Territory
BLEEX: Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton
BP: British Petroleum
CDB: China Development Bank
CIA: Central Intelligence Agency
CND: Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
COP: Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC
CTBT: Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
CW: chemical weapons
DARPA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
DEFCON: defense readiness condition
DOD: Department of Defense
DOE: Department of Energy
DU: depleted uranium
EPA: Environmental Protection Agency
GE: General Electric
HEU: highly enriched uranium
IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency
IBM: International Business Machines
ISN: Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies
IT: Information Technology
LEU: low-enriched uranium
MAD: mutually assured destruction
MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
NAM: Non-Aligned Movement
NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NAVSTAR
GPS: navigation system for timing and ranging, Global Positioning System
NEPA: National Environmental Policy Act
NIH: National Institutes of Health
NNI: National Nanotechnology Initiative
NPT: Non-Proliferation Treaty
NSC: National Security Council
NSF: National Science Foundation
NSG: Nuclear Suppliers Group
NWFZ: nuclear-weapon-free zone
OPEC: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
OSRD: Office of Scientific Research and Development
PNE: peaceful nuclear explosion
POW: prisoner of war
PTBT: Partial Test Ban Treaty
R&D: research and development
RADAR: radio detection and ranging
SDS: Students for a Democratic Society
START: Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty
TRIPS: Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
UN: United Nations
UNFCCC: UN Framework on Convention on Climate Change
WgU: weapon-grade uranium
WTO: World Trade Organization
Environmental Catastrophe
Laray Polk: When we began this conversation in 2010, our starting point was a statement you had recently made in the press: There are two problems for our species survivalnuclear war and environmental catastrophe. What is meant by environmental catastrophe?
Noam Chomsky: Actually, quite a lot of things. The major one is anthropogenic global warminghuman contribution to global warming, greenhouse gases, othersbut thats only a part of it. There are other sources of whats called pollutionthe destruction of the environmentthat are quite serious: erosion, the elimination of agricultural land, and turning agricultural land into biofuel, which has had a severe effect on hunger. Its not just an environmental problem; its a human problem. Building dams and cutting down the Amazon forests has ecological consequencesthere are thousands of things and the problems are getting a lot worse.
For one reason, because of the role of the United States. I mean, nobodys got a wonderful role in this, but as long as the United States is dragging down the entire world, which is what its doing now, nothing significant is going to happen on these issues. The US has to at least be seriously taking part and should be well in the lead. Its kind of ironic; if you look at this hemisphere, the country that is well in the lead in trying to do something serious about the environment is the poorest country in South America, Bolivia. They recently passed laws granting rights to nature.It comes out of the indigenous traditions, largelythe indigenous majority, theyve got the government advocating on their behalf. Sophisticated Westerners can laugh at that, but Bolivia is going to have the last laugh.
Next page