• Complain

St. Martins Press - The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

Here you can read online St. Martins Press - The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: Macmillan Publishers;St. Martins Press;St. Martins Paperbacks, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Macmillan Publishers;St. Martins Press;St. Martins Paperbacks
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

With Reporting and Analysis by the New York Times
What happened on 9/11 and how? Have we learned any lessons? Are we safer now?

The questions every American wants answered.


Since September 11, 2001, Americans have wondered how the tragic events of that day could have occurred. This is the complete report of the circumstances surrounding the attacts, including:

  • Al Qaeda and the organization of the 9/11 attack
    • Intelligence collection, analysis, and management
    • International counterterrorism policy
    • The inner workings of terrorist financing
    • The security of American borders
    • Law enforcement inside the U.S.
    • Commercial aviation and transportation safety
    • Personal interviews with Presidents Clinton and Bush on their roles
      Supplemented with analysis and reporting by The New York Times, this edition of The 9/11 Report also makes recommendations as to how to prevent terrorist attacks...
  • St. Martins Press: author's other books


    Who wrote The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

    The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

    Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make
    NOTE If you purchased this book without a cover you should be aware that this - photo 1

    NOTE: If you purchased this book without a cover you should be aware that this book is stolen property. It was reported as unsold and destroyed to the publisher, and neither the author nor the publisher has received any payment for this stripped book.

    THE 9/11 REPORT

    Copyright 2004 by St. Martins Press.

    Reporting and analysis 2004 by The New York Times.

    The Report of The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States is in the public domain and nocopyright is claimed therein.

    All rights reserved. No part of this book that is not in the public domain may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For information address St. Martins Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.

    ISBN: 0-312-93554-4
    EAN: 80312-93554-2

    Printed in the United States of America

    St. Martins Paperbacks edition / August 2004

    St. Martins Paperbacks are published by St. Martins Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.

    10 9 8 7 6 5 4

    THE

    9/11

    REPORT

    BACKGROUND ON
    THE 9/11
    COMMISSION

    What follows is a chronology of major developments in the work of the 9/11 commission as they have been reported in The New York Times since the fall of 2002; the articles have been abridged. They are followed by two complete stories that appeared in the paper on July 22, 2004.

    HOUSE GIVES WAY ON A SEPT. 11 COMMISSION;
    CONGRESS IS SET TO CREATE IT

    By DAVID FIRESTONE

    WASHINGTON, Friday, Nov. 15 [2002]

    Yielding to intense pressure from families of Sept. 11 victims, the White House agreed last night to a Congressional compromise that would create an independent commission to investigate the terrorist attacks. The House immediately approved a bill to establish the commission on a 366-to-3 vote before adjourning for the year early this morning. The Senate was expected to pass it later today.

    The 10-member commission will be charged with providing the nation the most comprehensive examination of the vulnerabilities that made the attacks possible. It will have up to 18 months to hold hearings and prepare a report on topics that include intelligence agencies, diplomacy and immigration controls, and is intended to be unflinching in assigning blame for specific government failures.

    The agreement puts an end to several months of wrangling between Congress and the Bush administration, which had objected to details of the commissions makeup. Senator Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader, said earlier Thursday that the administration was stalling on the plan because it could not control the commissions eventual findings.

    But the White House had said for a month that Mr. Bush supported a commission, and after intense pressure from victims families, the administration agreed to a plan tonight that is similar to the one originally proposed by members of Congress and family representatives.

    The panel of private citizens will be evenly divided between appointees of Republicans and Democrats. Congressional negotiators conceded two points to the administration, allowing it to choose the chairman and agreeing that any subpoenas would have to be issued by at least six commission members. The White House had feared that the five Democrats on the panel could turn it into a political witchhunt.

    The key to the compromise was allowing Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, to appoint one of the Republican slots. Mr. McCain had fought zealously for the commission for months, leveling bitter criticism at the White House as stalling it, and family representatives as well as Democrats said he would appoint someone who would be aggressive in questioning public officials. At the same time, the White House was satisfied that Mr. McCains appointment would not be partisan in nature.

    PRESIDENT NAMES KISSINGER TO
    LEAD 9/11 COMMISSION

    By RICHARD W. STEVENSON

    WASHINGTON, Nov. 28 [2002]

    President Bush today named Henry A. Kissinger, a Republican who has been one of the most respected but polarizing figures in foreign policy and Washington for more than three decades, to lead an independent investigation into the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

    In choosing Mr. Kissinger, 79, the president selected a person whose reputation as a towering intellect in foreign policy is matched by the passions he has aroused among critics of his role in the Vietnam War, relations with the Soviet Union and the exercise of American power in Latin America. Mr. Bush made the appointment as he signed legislation creating the commission, a step he came to support after opposing the bill for much of the year partly on the ground that it could divert attention from the war on terrorism.

    Democratic leaders in Congress, who will appoint half of the 10 members of the commission, immediately named George J. Mitchell, the former Senate majority leader and peace envoy to Northern Ireland and the Middle East, as vice chairman.

    The commissions mandate is to conduct a wide-ranging inquiry into the causes of the attacks, whether they could have been averted and what changes are needed to prevent a similar occurrence.

    The commission is required to complete its work within 18 monthsa timetable that would have it issue its final report in the middle of a presidential election yearthough Mr. Bush said he hoped it would finish sooner. The leaders of the two parties in Congress must appoint the rest of the members by Dec. 15.

    The commission will have the power to issue subpoenas by majority vote, and lawmakers have urged that it cast its net widely and interview current and former government officials, including Mr. Bush and his predecessor, Bill Clinton.

    KISSINGER PULLS OUT AS CHIEF OF INQUIRY
    INTO 9/11 ATTACKS

    By DAVID FIRESTONE

    WASHINGTON, Dec. 14 [2002]

    Henry A. Kissinger abruptly resigned today as chairman of the commission intended to investigate the Sept. 11 attacks, informing President Bush that he decided to step down because resolving potential conflicts of interest would have meant liquidating his consulting firm, Kissinger Associates, a step that he said would have unduly delayed the commissions work.

    President Bush, who aides said was surprised by the decision, vowed to find a replacement quickly.

    His chairmanship would have provided the insights and analysis the government needs to understand the methods of our enemies and the nature of the threats we face, Mr. Bush said. My administration will work quickly to select a new chairman whose mission will be to uncover every detail and learn every lesson of Sept. 11, even as we act on what we have learned so far to better protect and defend America.

    Mr. Kissinger, who was appointed by Mr. Bush, is the second prominent figure on the panel to resign this week over a personal conflict. His decision seemed to underscore how difficult it is proving to fill a commission intended to find out about the governments inability to prevent the attacks. On Wednesday, former Senator George J. Mitchell, who had been selected by Congressional Democrats to be the vice chairman, resigned from the panel, citing time pressures and an unwillingness to sever ties with his law firm.

    Congressional Democrats immediately appointed former Representative Lee H. Hamilton as vice chairman. But Republicans have still not announced three of their appointments, two days before a Sunday deadline set in the law that created the 10-member commission. Five members are appointed by Congressional Democrats, four by Congressional Republicans and the chairman is chosen by the president. No confirmation of the appointees is needed.

    Next page
    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make

    Similar books «The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States»

    Look at similar books to The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


    Reviews about «The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States»

    Discussion, reviews of the book The 9/11 Report. The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.