Introduction
Knowledge in Islam and an Islamic approach to education has been a domain of contestation and the core of scholarly debates and contentions across the Muslim world. In an endeavor to enhance understanding on the importance of knowledge in Islam and various methodologies and trajectories to knowledge acquisition by different factions of Muslims, this introduction provides an overview of Islamic epistemology and approaches to education suggested by different schools of thoughts in Islam.
To reflect the reality of the Muslim world, the discussion will follow the division of Islam wherein the Sunn views are compared to those of Shah. Arguably such division is not the paramount approach to study education, not least since many ideas and theories are not the matter of either/or. However, this approach may contribute to a better understanding of the theoretical diversity within the Muslim world which is fashioned based on a sectarian division.
The theories are mostly discussed as in their original form. Albeit modified and reformed, they are still utilized both as theoretical foundations and as indigenous policy-making instruments in most of the Muslim educational settings. Discussing the theories without reflecting on their temporal evolutions by no means is to undervalue the dynamics of intellectual and educational thought in the Muslim world, nor to deny the efforts and achievements of Muslim thinkers whose scholarly contribution to modern intellectual and educational outlooks have extensively been acknowledged. Such reforms in the education theories and adaptations of the new approaches, not least inspired by Western theories and practices, are discussed in the introduction to Part II of this volume: Islam and Education in the Modern Era Social, Cultural, Political Changes and Responses from Islamic Education.
Islamic Epistemology
Islamic epistemology primarily addresses the classic questions about the possibility, nature, and sources of knowledge. Knowledge in Islam is sharply divided into divine and mundane, the latter subordinate to the former. While the divine knowledge is present and is only accessible to the Prophet through revelation, the mundane is acquired by scholastic means. The divine knowledge ultimately is identical with human knowledge while at the same time it is somehow of higher order, both quantitatively and qualitatively (Dahln : 436437) divides the entirety of human knowledge into two all-embracing categories:
The first kind comprises the philosophical sciences. They are the ones with which man can become acquainted through the very nature of his ability to think and to whose objects, problems, arguments, and methods of instruction he is guided by his human perceptions, so that he is made aware of the distinction between what is correct and what is wrong in them by his own speculation and research, in as much as he is a thinking human being.
The second kind comprises the traditional, conventional sciences. All of them depend upon information based on the authority of the given religious law. There is no place for the intellect in them, save that the intellect may be used in connection with them to relate problems of detail with basic principles. Particulars that constantly come into being are not included in the general tradition by the mere fact of its existence. Therefore, they need to be related [to general principles] by some kind of analogical reasoning. However, such analogical reasoning is derived from [traditional] information, while the character of the basic principle, which is traditional, remains valid [unchanged]. Thus, analogical reasoning of this type reverts to being tradition [itself], because it is derived from it.
With this typology, knowledge of various nature fall into one of the categories of the two-fold taxonomy: they either belong to the first type known as al- ulm al-aqlyah (argumentative knowledge); or they are part of the second category labelled as al- ulm al-naqlyah (knowledge by transmission). Hence, two distinct approaches to knowledge acquisition appear in Islam, each of which is established in the form of various theories of knowledge within the Muslim epistemology. The first approach is the knowledge as the direct divine illumination, a prophetic approach for which human spiritual development is required. The second approach, however, relies on a philosophical methodology: to understand unknown phenomena through the known ones. While the latter moves from the imagination upward to the theoretical intellect, the prophetic approach takes the reverse path, from the theoretical intellect to the imagination. For this reason, knowledge of philosophy is knowledge of the natures of things themselves, while knowledge of prophecy is knowledge of the natures of things as wrapped up in symbols, the shadows of the imagination (Inati ). The philosophical approach requires scholastic methodologies to knowledge acquisition and the process of knowledge attainment is gradual. The prophetic knowledge, however, could not be gained in the same philosophical manner. The philosophical approach is based on the acquired intellect, gained through acquired knowledge. It is acquired, because it comes from outside. The acquired intellect is the highest human achievement, a sacred state which conjoins human and divine realms by conjoining the theoretical and agent intellects (ibid.: 14). Unlike, the philosophical approach, the prophetic trajectory requires a set of preparations through which the human soul is equipped to receive knowledge.