Anne Cleary
The Gendered Landscape of Suicide Masculinities, Emotions, and Culture
Anne Cleary
UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
ISBN 978-3-030-16633-5 e-ISBN 978-3-030-16634-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16634-2
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Cover illustration: Khurshid Dustmurodov/EyeEm
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Throughout history and across many cultures, men have been far more likely to take their own lives and in modern society, blue collar, less educated men are especially at risk. In this important new study of men who want to, try to and do commit suicide, the sociologist Anne Cleary discovers underlying feelings of anguish, desperation, and shame. Equally important, she astutely observes that as men they feel obliged to bravely cover such feelings from public view. This misplaced notion of male valor, she persuasively argues, has tragically escaped public notice, seen as just how men are and foreclosed the possibility of receiving vitally needed help. An important contribution to sociology and a revelatory book for policy-makers, men at risk of their male socializationand everyone else.
Professor Arlie R. Hochschild, Professor Emerita, Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley
For David
Acknowledgements
Chapter draws on material originally published in:
Cleary, A. (2012). Suicidal action, emotional expression, and the performance of masculinities. Social Science & Medicine, 74 , 498505.
Chapter refers to material originally published in:
Cleary, A. (2017). Help-seeking patterns and attitudes to treatment amongst men who attempted suicide. Journal of Mental Health, 26 (3), 2204.
This research was funded by the Irish Research Council and the National Disability Authority and facilitated by an award from the Fulbright Commission (Ireland).
The author would like to thank the men who participated in this study and record her gratitude to the staff of the hospitals and services involved in the research as well as to the staff of the Central Statistics Office, Cork.
Contents
1. Introduction: The Gendered Landscape of Suicide
Why Study Suicide?
Suicide has been identified by the World Health Organisation (: 345 ) and helps to explain the relationship between the person and his/her society. This is an important objective of sociology and of this book which explores how social and emotional issues are implicated in suicidal action.
Defining Suicide
Although suicide appears to be a clear and conclusive action, defining a death as suicide is problematic and this has significant implications for research in the area. Suicide is only categorised as such when there is clear intent and this is generally only possible to confirm from written information left by the deceased and or the lethality of the method used. Notes are left by a minority of those who kill themselves (ODonnell et al. ) noted, suicide is rarely circumscribed by the precise moment when it is accomplished.
The meaning of suicide is contested across cultures and time because suicide is a culturally constructed act performed in the context of a cultural system of meaning ( Counts ) demonstrates in her study of suicide in Russia . Explanations for a reputed epidemic of suicides in nineteenth-century Russia centred on the rise of secularisation while in the twentieth century the Soviet Government cast rising rates of suicide as a residue of the old bourgeois order (ibid.: 15).
Culture exerts a considerable influence on suicide rates particularly in terms of the societys overall attitude or script in relation to suicide . Western society, operating within a similar religious milieu, has tended to label suicide as deviant either in a religious, social, or psychological sense but there are societies where suicide is condoned or even valorized. There are also cultures where ambiguous attitudes to suicide exist, where the practice is permitted in certain circumstances. This can occur in societies where suicide is strongly prohibited and disguised forms of suicide are required to transform the deed into a positive action or into a feat of individual or political bravery. Political hunger strikes in Ireland and the practice of Jihad in Muslim culture are examples of this practice (Andriolo ). Cultural ideas are interwoven with beliefs about gender and class and these factors have an important influence on suicide patterns .
Since the twentieth century, mental illness has become the dominant paradigm for understanding suicide. Within the biomedical framework suicide results primarily from mental illness, particularly depression , but social factors are increasingly cited in these explanations to address high levels of suicide outside the clinical domain ( Hamdi et al. ) Le Suicide in the late nineteenth century and there were some important studies in the 1960s and 1970s but thereafter sociological interest in the topic decreased.
The Sociological Understanding of Suicide
Sociological understanding of suicide began in the nineteenth century with Durkheims () analysis of the phenomenon and Le Suicide remains one of the best known and most referenced texts on this topic. His choice of subject was deliberate in that he sought to challenge the prevailing nineteenth-century view of suicide as shaped by personal factors including mental illness. Durkheims aim was to move the explanatory framework for suicide from the individual to the group and in this way establish the credentials of the emerging discipline of sociology. He used national statistical data, newly introduced in Europe, to map suicide patterns across nations and explained variations in terms of sociocultural factors . Durkheim focused on suicide rates which he believed were social facts reflecting suicidogenic currents or trends in a society. He proposed that each society had a specific tendency towards suicide which is a function of collective consciousness, social relationships and the shared beliefs that bind people together. According to Durkheim the collective tendencies in a society towards suicide dominate the consciousness of individuals and these currents are variously felt across a society. He developed four types of suicide anomic, egoistic, altruistic and fatalisticwhich he maintained were symptomatic of different types of social structure. He attributed egoistic suicide to lack of integration within a society and altruistic suicide to over-integration; anomic suicide as representative of a society lacking regulation and fatalistic suicide to over-regulation in society. His central thesis was that societies require a critical level of integration and or regulation to provide protection from suicide. When levels of integration or regulation are too low, or too high, members of the society lack the necessary social rules or goals, their social-psychological identity is impaired and the most vulnerable among them commit suicide. He examined factors such as the family and religion and concluded that suicide varies inversely with the degree of integration of the religious and domestic groups of which the individual forms a part. He theorised that Catholics were members of a more integrated religion and therefore had lower rates of suicide than Protestants and that family membership also conferred protection from suicide.