• Complain

Hutchinson - The Politically Incorrect Guide<sup>TM</sup> to the Bible

Here you can read online Hutchinson - The Politically Incorrect Guide<sup>TM</sup> to the Bible full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Washington;DC, year: 2007;2010, publisher: Regnery Press;Regnery Pub, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Regnery Press;Regnery Pub
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2007;2010
  • City:
    Washington;DC
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Defends the reliability of the Bible and argues that it is the source of Western ideas of charity, justice, reason, science, and democracy.;Why do the heathens rage?-- The stones cry out -- All Scripture is God-breathed -- In the beginning -- Be fruitful and multiply -- In the image and likeness of God -- Keep my commandments -- Sodom and Gomorrah -- The heavens declare the glory of God -- You were called to freedom -- Endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights -- Put not your trust in Princes -- Who do you say that I am?

The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents For Robert James Kelly Mary and Jane Chapter One - photo 1
Table of Contents

For Robert James Kelly Mary and Jane Chapter One WHY DO THE - photo 2
For Robert, James, Kelly,
Mary, and Jane
Chapter One
WHY DO THE HEATHENS RAGE Guess what Contrary to what anti-religious - photo 3
WHY DO THE HEATHENS RAGE?
Guess what?
Picture 4Contrary to what anti-religious secularists assert, far more lives have been snuffed out throughout history by faith-hating fanatics than by religious believers.
Picture 5The total number of people murdered by their own antiJudeo-Christian governments in the twentieth century equals about 170 million.
Were told that four-fifths of American homes have a Bible, so go get it, bellows Penn Jillette of the controversial comedy /magic act Penn & Teller, on their Showtime TV series, Penn & Teller: Bullsh*t!
Really, no kidding! Go get your g*dda*n Bible! If you dont read along with us tonight, youre going to think were making this sh*t up.
And so begins the controversial duos debunking of the holy scriptures of Christianity and Judaisma twenty-eight-minute foul-mouthed harangue exhibiting all the erudition of a biker bar and just about as much sensitivity.
Penn, a towering lumberjack of a man with a ponytail and Norris Skipper goatee, does all the talking in the show while Teller illustrates his points with little magic tricks.
Tonight, were going to take you through the da*n Bible and show you its full of inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and outright impossibilities... that its more fiction than fact, he announces solemnlyand then, thumping his black leather Bible, he adds, You know, being on TV, in a suit, and yelling with this da*n book in my hand.... I look just like one of those evangelical assh*les.
On and on it goes.
Anyone who says that Christianity in general, and the Bible in particular, are not mocked in popular culture has not been watching TV in a while.
Penn and Teller trot out a handful of alleged biblical expertssuch as Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazineto make their case against the Bible.
The more we learn about archaeology and history of biblical times, says Shermer excitedly, the more we realize that most of the stuff in the Bible is fiction.
Want proof?
In the first chapter of Genesis, Shermer points out, Adam and Eve are created at the same time. In the second chapter, Adam is created first.
See? Right off the bat, you know the whole book is a complete fraud. Inconsistencies like that just rattle your faith to the very bone.
Sometimes the Bible is the word of God, explains Penn, sometimes its the word of one man, sometimes its the word of two men. Sometimes the Bible is literal, and sometimes its simply symbolic.
Clearly, this makes it unreliable and a waste of time.
All of this might be merely amusingyet another example of how high you can climb in Hollywood with a high school educationwere it not for the fact that such village-atheist assaults on the Bible are now commonplace in public schools, universities, the media, and even some elite seminaries.
It wouldnt be so bad if these attacks on the Bible represented something genuinely newsomething witty and entertaining on the level of, say, a Nietzsche or a Swinburnebut instead they are merely repetitions of allegations made for about 1,800 years. They are as original as dirtand about as interesting. The problem is, many of these new champions of enlightened reason, standing on high from the pinnacles of academia, dont appear to be aware that their ideas are literally millennia old.
The Bibles enemies
The Bible was not exactly a raging bestseller when it was first published in the centuries after Jesuss death. The Romans didnt particularly like the Jews to begin with, considering them barbaric and quite primitive. In the Jewish Wars of 6670 AD, the Romans put down the Jewish fight for freedom with definitive ferocity: Up to a million Jews were slaughtered and the holy city of Jerusalem (and its world-famous Temple) was razed to the ground.
When Christianity came on the scene, it was viewed as worsea bizarre, superstitious cult whose founder, a wild-eyed Jewish fanatic stirring up trouble, was sensibly put to death. His erstwhile followers were said to meet secretly where they ate human flesh and drank human blood. There were rumors of rampant immorality, even incestuous orgies, as the members of the cult referred to one another as brother and sister. Plainly, as new religions go, this Eastern superstition had little to recommend it when compared with, say, the elevated mystery rites of Isis or Mithra or the Stoics.
Scripture Says
Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
Psalm 2:13
And then there was their holy book!
If there was anything designed to chase an educated Roman away from Christianity, it was the Christian Bible.
The Christian and Jewish scriptures had to be seen to be believed, they said: A ragtag collection of folktales, strange laws, badly written letters, biographies of wonder-working magiciansall written with no regard to literary style, verbal felicity, or the rules of rhetoric.
To educated Romans raised on the polished elegance of Virgil and Cicero, Ennius and Cato, the Christian writings were positively juvenile, filled with vulgar misspellings, absurd grammatical errors, and ridiculous plots. As the second century Latin Christian apologist Tertullian put it, Men are so far from accepting our Scriptures, no one approaches them unless he is already a Christian. St. Augustine, the greatest theologian of the first millennium of Christianity, was so put off by the Bible he ignored it (and Christianity) for a dozen years.
It is clear to me that the writings of the Christians are a lie, and that your fables are not well-enough constructed to conceal this monstrous fiction, said the second-century anti-Christian polemicist Celsus. I have heard that some of your interpreters... are on to the inconsistencies and, pen in hand, alter the original writings, three, four, and several more times over in order to be able to deny the contradictions in the face of criticism.
Who Said It?
The Bible has been the Magna Carta of the poor and oppressed. The human race is not in a position to dispense with it.
Thomas Huxley
As an example of the absurd stories found in the Christian and Jewish scriptures, Celsus cites the account of Noahs ark:
So too their fantastic storywhich they take from the Jewsconcerning the flood and the building of an enormous ark, and the business about the message being brought back to the survivors of the flood by a dove (or was it an old crow?). This is nothing more than a debased and nonsensical version of the myth of Deucalion, a fact I am sure they would not want to come light.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible»

Look at similar books to The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Politically Incorrect GuideTM to the Bible and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.