• Complain

Stephen Hopgood - Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International

Here you can read online Stephen Hopgood - Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Ithaca, year: 2006, publisher: Cornell University Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stephen Hopgood Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International
  • Book:
    Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Cornell University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2006
  • City:
    Ithaca
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

If one organization is synonymous with keeping hope alive, even as a faint glimmer in the darkness of a prison, it is Amnesty International. Amnesty has been the light, and that light was truthbearing witness to suffering hidden from the eyes of the world.from the PrefaceThe first in-depth look at working life inside a major human rights organization, Keepers of the Flame charts the history of Amnesty International and the development of its nerve center, the International Secretariat, over forty-five years. Through interviews with staff members, archival research, and unprecedented access to Amnesty Internationals internal meetings, Stephen Hopgood provides an engrossing and enlightening account of day-to-day operations within the organization, larger decisions about the nature of its mission, and struggles over the implementation of that mission.An enduring feature of Amnestys inner life, Hopgood finds, has been a recurrent struggle between the keepers of the flame who seek to preserve Amnestys accumulated store of moral authority and reformers who hope to change, modernize, and use that moral authority in ways that its protectors fear may erode the organizations uniqueness. He also explores how this concept of moral authority affects the working lives of the servants of such an ideal and the ways in which it can undermine an institutions political authority over time. Hopgood argues that human-rights activism is a social practice best understood as a secular religion where internal conflict between sacred and profanethe mission and the practicalities of everyday operationsare both unavoidable and necessary. Keepers of the Flame is vital reading for anyone interested in Amnesty International, its accomplishments, agonies, obligations, fears, opportunities, and challengesor, more broadly, in how humanitarian organizations accommodate the moral passions that energize volunteers and professional staff alike.

Stephen Hopgood: author's other books


Who wrote Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
keepers OF THE flame

UNDERSTANDING AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
stephen hopgood
CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ithaca and london
contents

preface and acknowledgments
of the many shocking things I heard during my fieldwork, the one I find most disturbing is the story of a man who was kept in a box by his torturers. His name is Luis Muoz. This was Chile in the 1970s, under Pinochet, and Luis was among thousands who suffered from the brutality of the generals Cold War regime. One day they opened the box just to tell him they had killed his wife, and then they shut it again. This haunting image remains in my mind as the very essence of human misery: alone, physically and emotionally broken, but alive. Most of all I found it unbearable to imagine what he must have felt in the darkness after the lid closed.
If one organization is synonymous with keeping hope alive, even as a faint glimmer in the darkness of a prison, it is Amnesty International. Amnesty has been the light, and that light was truthbearing witness to suffering hidden from the eyes of the world. Picture the Amnesty campaigner sitting in front of a television in 1997 watching videotaped testimony in Spanish of a Guatemalan peasant woman whose husband was taken in 1992 from their house by the police in a truck. He was beaten so badly during the journey that she could follow the trail of blood to the police station. They refused to release her husbands tortured body, demanding payment. Through a local human rights lawyer she found her way to Amnesty International and a researcher, sent out from London, who came to take her testimony. The volunteer watching this woman, five years later, found himself reaching out to the screen. I actually remember speaking to this woman and saying well try, well try to do something, he says. I felt I had to do something. I felt it was my problem.
In 1984, OBrien tormented Winston by trying to destroy this hope: Remember that it is forever. The face will always be there to be stamped upon. The heretic, the enemy of society, will always be there, so that he can be defeated and humiliated over again. Everything that you have undergone since you have been in our handsall that will continue, and worse. The espionage, the betrayals, the arrests, the tortures, the executions, the disappearances will never cease. It was precisely this heretic, this enemy of society, on whom Amnesty fixed: the prisoner of conscience. It is a potent and seductive ideal still. One early Mexican evening in August 2003, walking up the stone steps into a large meeting hall, I along with the gathered leaders of Amnesty was confronted by an ex-brigadier-general, Jose Gallardo, and his family, surrounded by 35,000 letters. These were the messages he had received in prison from Amnesty members. They spilled out across the floor, different sizes and colors, in loose piles and crammed into boxes, postmarked from all over the world. There were even Christmas cards. And in the middle of them all someone had placed a lighted white candle wrapped in barbed wire, flickering gently in the gathering gloom. Letter after letter expressed the same sentiment: you are not alone; dont give up hope. Here was an almost tangible kind of moral force. No wonder released prisoners talk with such wonder about receiving these letters. This scene seemed to contain an answer to the first question that had provoked me: Why should I join Amnesty? What follows will ask of you the same. In order to answer it, we have to understand what Amnesty is. It is not as straightforward as you might think.
Caught between sympathy and doubt, I wanted to know what human rights organizations were really like. I soon discovered a void existed where work on the culture of human rights ought to be found. A comparative study based on primary research was impossible. The foundational work does not exist. How could so many international relations scholars, institutional sociologists, political philosophers, and others talk so confidently about the meaning of human rights norms when so little was known about the social origins of those norms, how they assume the form they do, and what motivates those who make them their lifes work?
Acquiring the sociological depth necessary to see how morality takes concrete form meant a period of intense empirical study. It seemed best to do an analysis of one organization over time. In this respect, only one candidate would do and that was Amnesty International. From September 2002 to September 2003, I spent twelve months inside the International Secretariat (IS) of Amnesty in London. Although it is important to stress that, as we will see, the IS is not wholly representative of the 1.7 million members of the Amnesty movement, it is inside the IS that the second question motivating this studywhat is practical morality in action?has been puzzled through for forty-five years.
My research included more than 150 loosely structured interviews with present and former staff, observations at numerous meetings at all levels of the IS, and attendance at gatherings of the Amnesty memberships core governing body, its International Executive Committee (IEC), and its supreme policy-making forum, the biennial International Council Meeting (ICM). This observational and oral research was augmented by work in the IS archives, tracing features of the ISs and Amnestys organizational culture as they have evolved over many years.
This way of proceeding had various limitations. Most crucially, interviews were undertaken on the basis of anonymity, at all levels of the IS and Amnesty. I have tried wherever possible to use original material from these interviews. Using the words IS staff and Amnesty members use, including the hesitations, pauses, and changes of direction, gives a certain richness to the text, but these personal accounts are exemplary and not part of an exhaustive and fully representative sample, which would have been impossible to collect if it were to reflect contemporary diversity and historical change.
The interviewees were initially self-selected, responding to a posting on the staffs electronic bulletin board, IntSec Forum. After these, I sought interviewees out more directly by taking up suggestions about who had institutional knowledge, an interesting perspective, or an important historical or contemporary role. This group included staff from the research, campaigns, and resources parts of the IS, as well as members of long-standing, ex-senior staff and others no longer at the IS. The idea was to get at something of the quality of practice through the use of practitioners words. Some readers may find the lack of context about the speakers off-putting. I can only sympathize and say this was unavoidable; in most cases, the words are those of still-serving senior and junior IS staff, and taking care to protect their anonymity was my first consideration.
The vast amount of paper generated by Amnesty was a further limitation. Despite the efforts of archivists, most of this material is organized according to date and simply stored chronologically in paper form or on microfilm. Many documents, memos, and notes from the past do not have proper identification and are scattered through various files. There is no way to do a thematic search. If you want to know about Amnestys budgets over time, for example, you have to look at the financial part of quarterly IEC meetings year by year1964, 1965, 1966, and so onhoping to pick up the thread. Or you have to find later documents that summarize earlier material. In the end, I concentrated on the Secretary Generals Office and IEC files. You need to know in advance what you are looking for, in other words, heightening the role played by staff and members with institutional memory. This gives us a first inkling of how important evolutionary processes have been to Amnestys identity. Much material has been lost, misplaced, or buried in the filing cabinets of various individuals in the IS and the movement. Only the prisoner files, with their compromising contents, are securely locked away to avoid the unwanted attentions of states. Furthermore, the ISthe seat of Amnestys research work and organizationholds only movementwide material. The major sections, such as AIUK, AI Netherlands, and AIUSA, all have their own archives, papers that may tell the story differently given national experience and perspective. This diversity within the movement is matched by the great variety of subcultures within the IS. There were simply no regular meetings you might have gone to, or papers you might have read, or staff you might have spoken to that would have been representative of Amnesty and the IS as a whole. It is, as we will see, a remarkable mix of uniformity and autonomy, and contested internal authority has been its hallmark.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International»

Look at similar books to Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International»

Discussion, reviews of the book Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.