David L. Kendall
Copyright 2014 David L. Kendall
And for Jessica, my artful and talented daughter, who told me I should write a book.
Preface
Most people want to be good people, and most people are. In How to Win Friends and Influence People , Dale Carnegie recounted stories of how even Americas most notorious criminals, men like Al Capone and Two Gun Crowley, didnt see themselves as bad people . Even Hitler did not see himself as a bad guy. People want to be good, and they want to be thought to be good by others. For that reason, morality matters to people, because we cannot be good people if we are not first moral people.
This book is not about how capitalism works to advance human prosperity, which it surely does. This book is about the moral foundations of capitalism. Tens, if not hundreds, of excellent books have explained how capitalism works. The writings of Adam Smith , Frederic Bastiat , Ludwig von Mises , Ayn Rand , Milton Friedman , Friedrich Hayek, Israel Kirzner , George Reisman , and Murray Rothbard are but a few exceptional examples. A complete list of authors who have explained more than ably how capitalism generates human prosperity would run to tens of pages.
History shows unequivocally that capitalism works to generate widespread prosperity for humans. That conclusion is no longer much debated. 11,12 Capitalism definitely works. Yet, for all its success in generating human prosperity, capitalism is reviled by hundreds of millions of people around the globe. Googling the phrase capitalism images, yields anecdotal evidence of how reviled capitalism is. The search produces a panoply of images that convey negative, evil, or diabolical meanings for capitalism, with scarcely a positive, good, or inspiring image to be found. Why? Why is capitalism so denigrated?
Faced with undeniable historical evidence that capitalism generates unmatched prosperity for humans, its opponents have retrenched. Now the critics of capitalism claim that it is unjust, un-green, and immoralnever mind that it works. The mantras of social justice, save the planet and were all in this together have replaced the soundly debunked Marxist claim that socialism would inevitably be the bright future of humans. If you like capitalism, say its critics, shame on you. Now, the enemies of capitalism exhort us to support a democratic socialist agendabecause democratic socialism is just, green, and egalitarian, say the critics of capitalism.
Is capitalism unjust? Are contemporary opponents of capitalism right, claiming as they do that capitalism is immoral? That is the question this book explores. Because people want to be moral, the undeniable historical evidence that capitalism generates widespread prosperity is simply insufficient to silence the critics. For indeed, if capitalism is immoral , it should be rejected.
Acknowledgments
Nothing is more rare than an original idea. After at least 40 years of reading and hearing the ideas of hundreds of brilliant people, it is quite impossible for me to know whose ideas I have long ago adopted as if they were my own. If ever I had an original idea, I cannot tell you for sure what it is. Contrary to the hopes of academicians everywhere, I think that we who scribble a few words together in an essay may be unwitting plagiarists, regardless of how many citations we offer up. The list of philosophers, economists, scientists, novelists, and countless other scholars, who through their words or writing planted ideas in my mind, is by now quite long and utterly irretrievable.
Still, I must name a few who shaped many of the ideas readers find in this book. In my undergraduate days, Paul Heynes textbook, The Economic Way of Thinking, illuminated light bulbs in my mind on nearly every page. I believe professor Heynes book taught me foundations of just about all that I take myself to know about economics. A few years later in graduate school, the ideas of Milton Friedman had strong and lasting influence, with Free to Choose and Capitalism and Freedom forging permanent ideas in my mind about human dignity, liberty, and capitalism. Years beyond graduate school, Deidre McCloskeys book, The Rhetoric of Economics, convinced me that economics and philosophy have a large, unavoidable intersection.
Like most other people, I take myself to be a good person. But I had never really thought seriously about morality until I read and listened to the ideas of Peter Kreeft. 18,19 Professor Kreeft got me started; now, no end is in sight; so much to read, so little time. The literature of moral philosophy is vast, and as Robert Heinleins protagonist Valentine Michael Smith said, I am only an egg.
I am honored by and grateful to the University of Virginias College at Wise, whose faculty and administration granted me a sabbatical leave in spring 2012 to work on this book. I am also grateful to the five students, Tim Bush, Barklie Estes, Daniel Jones, Ethan Lavallee, and Joel Sprinkle, who took my honors course in fall 2011, titled The Morality of Capitalism. Their questions, comments, and objections helped shape this book. I am also especially grateful to Canda Kirnaz, my Turkish friend and former student, who is the inspiration for my fictional interlocutor, Tyro.
Finally, and significantly, I thank my true friend, my telia philia , Bobby Miser, who has done his best to teach me about asking and believing.
Table of Contents
?
Part I: Morality
Do you not see, first, thatas a mental abstractphysical force is directly opposed to morality; and secondly, that it practically drives out of existence the moral forces?
Auberon
Chapter 1. What Is Morality?
I had taken a course in Ethics. I read a thick textbook, heard the class discussions and came out of it saying I hadn't learned a thing I didn't know before about morals and what is right or wrong in human conduct.
Carl
~ ~ ~
Solon: Why so glum, Tyro?
Tyro: Someone stole my iPod.
Solon: How do you know? Maybe you just misplaced it.
Tyro: No, I didnt misplace it. I left it on the hood of my car in the parking lot at school this morning, while I was loading up my backpack. I know its dumb, but I forgot to pick it up. I remembered it by the time I got to my first class, but when I got back to my car, it was gone. Im really bummed.
Solon: Maybe one of your friends picked it up; maybe you will get it back.
Tyro: I wish I could believe that.
Solon: Well, what would you have done if you had seen an iPod sitting on the hood of someones car?
Tyro: I guess I would have picked it up, if I knew whose car it was.
Solon: What if you did not know whose car it was?
Tyro: I guess Id still have picked it up.
Solon: To turn in to the Deans office?
Tyro: Sure. If I kept it, that would be stealing.
Solon: So, what is wrong with stealing?
Tyro: Everyone knows that; stealing is just wrong.
~ ~ ~
Moral behavior is right conduct for humans when they interact with other humans. Moreover, morality is a prescriptive code that all rational people agree governs the behavior of all other rational people, and the behavior of any other rational life forms, if any exist. Whether humans are the only creatures on earth who are rational remains an open question. If some other life forms on earth are also rational, then we humans are obligated to interact morally with them also.
Humans may be the only rational beings who live on earth, but they are certainly not the only sentient beings. Sentient beings are those capable of feeling and perhaps are conscious of themselves, even if they are not rational. Many people believe that humans are obligated to interact morally with all sentient beings, not just other humans; others disagree, and still others are uncertain. If people are obligated to interact morally with all sentient beings, the implications are certainly profound, but beyond the purposes of this book, which focus on human interaction.