Sal Restivo
Einsteins Brain
Genius, Culture, and Social Networks
Sal Restivo
Ridgewood, NY, USA
ISBN 978-3-030-32917-4 e-ISBN 978-3-030-32918-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32918-1
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Cover pattern John Rawsterne/patternhead.com
This Palgrave Pivot imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
What an intriguing achievement! In a provocative and at times chucklesome discussion across six chapters, Restivo develops the idea that Einstein and Einsteins brain in everyday (and even in scientific) usage are as much grammatical illusions as concrete objects of experience. Restivo encourages us to rethink the individualized sources and attributed value of being an intellectual pioneer. This book proposes a strong sociological alternative to reigning brains-in-a-vat and brain-centric ideas that define Einstein and Einsteins brain as singular and iconic achievements. Restivo doesnt diminish Einsteins uniqueness, he just situates it socially and culturally. An altogether imaginative argument and enjoyable read.
Jaber. F. Gubrium,Professor of Public Health, College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts and Professor Emeritus, University of Missouri, USA
This book is an intriguing and erudite treatise informed by sweeping knowledge of intellectual currents in multiple academic disciplines. From a decidedly sociological perspective, Restivo argues that the self is dependent on a persons social contexts, so much so that the very existence of an individual self is in question. Most of the book is not primarily about Einstein or his brain, but Restivo very cleverly uses Einsteins brain repeatedly to make his point that we ought not consider ourselves to be merely our brains. This free-ranging text represents a significant extension of the social brain hypothesis, and will be most appreciated by those with a solid background in sociology and the neurosciences, and those interested in a theoretical argument grounded in both intuition and empirical observation. Restivos newest work is a bold re-imagining of the nature of the self, an important antidote to the long-lived but incomplete conception of genius as localized within a gifted individuals brain.
David. S. Moore,Professor of Psychology, Pitzer College and Claremont Graduate University, USA, and author ofThe Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of Nature vs. Nurture(2002); andThe Developing Genome: An Introduction to Behavioral Epigenetics(2015)
Prologue
In the early years following the publication of Albert Einsteins 1905 papers, a lot of the buzz centered around the debate about the ether in physics. TheNew York Timesof September 8, 1913, reported a rift between Einstein and Max Planck on one side of the issue and Sir Oliver Lodge and his British colleagues on the other. Lodge believed in the ether, a medium eliminated in what was now known as Einsteins special relativity theory .
Ether theories have ancient roots. In the early modern and modern context a space filling transmission medium called theetherwas believed necessary for the propagation of electromagnetic or gravitational forces. Einsteins name next appeared in theTimeson June 10, 1918, with a story about an effort afoot to test Einsteins general relativity theory . This was a reference to predictions in Einsteins theory concerning the bending of light in gravitational fields. Evidence for the theory was already observed in the anomalous precession of the perihelion of the planet Mercury. The most dramatic and successful test of the theory came when scientists observed star light bending in the vicinity of the suns gravitational field in 1919, an observation made possible by a solar eclipse. The paper quoted W.W. Campbell of the Lick Observatory in California on the test. Campbell was cautious about whether the test would provide meaningful data. In both stories, there was little of substance concerning the contents of the special and general theories.
In the wake of the 1919 successful test of Einsteins theory, Einsteins name began to appear with some regularity in theNew York Timesand other newspapers. One recurring theme was that readers should not expect to understand Einsteins theories. Stories about Einsteins biography began to appear along with efforts to explain relativity theory to the lay public. ATimescorrespondent interviewed Einstein in December 1919. As Einstein tried to speak plainly about his theory, a clock chimed announcing the end of the interview. The clever reporter noted the irony of the absolute tyranny of time and space triumphing over Einsteins contemptuous denial of their existence.
Following an announcement by the Royal Astronomical Society endorsing Einsteins theory, an opinion piece in theTimescompared the growing accommodation to Einsteins theory with the embrace of Bolshevism in Russia. In November 1919, Charles Poor of Columbia University wrote in that paper that there was as much conflict at the center of science as there was in the realm of society and politics. In the following months and years, theTimespublished stories on the complexity of Einsteins theories. Notables from Warren G. Harding to Einsteins wife Elsa were reported to be unable to grasp the nature and meaning of Einsteins theories.
The making of an icon and the evolution of the genius of all geniuses were well under way in the early 1920s. TheTimescontinued to try to help readers understand relativity and Einsteins name started to show up in non-relativity stories. A story about French efforts in interplanetary communication included Einsteins ideas about life on other planets and how extra-terrestrial beings would communicate with us. In January 1921, Einsteins theory of the metrics of a finite universe appeared inconspicuously as a small item on the bottom of the front page of the