They are the pinnacle of privilege, leading enviably gilded lives, but how much do we really know of the royal familys cosy, taxpayer-funded existence? Norman Baker goes behind palace walls to shine a much-needed light on this most secretive of institutions and expose the greed, hypocrisy and yes disregard for public money which keep it afloat. Filled with fascinating detail and insight, And What Do You Do? is an essential primer for understanding the myth of modern royalty.
RICHARD KAY, ROYAL WRITER FOR THE DAILY MAIL
With our democracy in turmoil, its right to be asking questions about constitutional reform, and that includes the role of the royal family. Norman Baker tackles the subject with his trademark energy and in forensic detail, looking at the facts beyond the headlines. An important book for anyone serious about questioning how our country is run.
CAROLINE LUCAS MP
Norman Baker brilliantly exposes how a Ruritanian farce is ripping us off. Vive la British revolution!
KEVIN MAGUIRE, DAILY MIRROR
Norman Baker is a fiercely independent writer and former Lib Dem MP and government minister who speaks his mind and goes where others fear to tread. After probing the mysterious death of Dr Kelly after the Iraq War, he now turns his attention to the public costs of the royal family, based on careful research and facts rather than sentiments or prejudice.
SIR VINCE CABLE MP
And What Do You Do? is a clear-eyed assessment of our royal family, looking at its strengths, weaknesses and eccentricities. Parts of Norman Bakers well-researched book will make for uncomfortable reading for some die-hard royal fans, but it should become an important text for anyone who cares about our monarchy and wants to see it reform and evolve to face head on the challenges of the twenty-first century.
CHRISTOPHER HOPE, CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT AND ASSISTANT EDITOR, DAILY TELEGRAPH
At any given moment, there is a sort of pervading orthodoxy, a general tacit agreement, not to discuss large and uncomfortable facts.
G EORGE O RWELL
No institution city, monarchy, whatever should expect to be free from the scrutiny of those who give it their loyalty.
Q UEEN E LIZABETH II, N OVEMBER 1992
Contents
T he royal family is the original Coronation Street, a long-running soap opera with the occasional real coronation thrown in. Its members have become celebrities, like up-market versions of film stars and footballers. The mainstream media coverage treats them accordingly. So, for the most part, we are fed a constant diet of sickeningly sycophantic coverage which reports their activities with breathless and uncritical awe. The Queen looked marvellous. The crowd that lined the streets was hugely enthusiastic. For Mrs Miggins, just to be within 100 yards of Harry made it a day she will never forget as long as she lives.
Alternatively, the family is subject to trivial voyeurism into what are genuinely their private lives, unconnected with their public roles. Who was that very distant relative of the Queen snorting coke at some Chelsea party? Are Andrew and Sarah going to remarry? Didnt Kate wear that same dress four months ago?
Whether infantile infatuation or intolerable intrusion, the British public deserves better than this puerile diet.
The monarchy is an important part of our constitution and exercises considerable influence on the kind of nation we are. Yet you will struggle to find very much in the way of proper journalism that examines the monarchy in the way that their position and influence merit in a mature democracy.
This book sets out to correct this. It is a serious book about a serious subject. It is most definitely not slavishly sycophantic, but nor does it seek to paint the royals in a deliberately unflattering light. It simply aims to establish and present the facts.
When the American author Kitty Kelley was researching for The Royals, her book on the monarchy which was published about twenty years ago, she was scolded by Lady Rothschild: We dont need a book by an objective American. Youre not supposed to be objective about royalty, adding for good measure: We have to protect our royal family from themselves.
I disagree. This is the twenty-first century, and the time for fantasies is over. Let us instead have the facts.
W e all arrived much too early. I was to learn that the arrival time given to guests for royal visits was always much too early, even where the royal personage in question was so far down the pecking order that nobody really had very much idea who they were.
The reason, I discovered, was to prevent the apparently appalling possibility of someone arriving after the royal in question. On this occasion, the visitor was to be none other than the Queen herself, accompanied by the garrulous Prince Philip, so the delay between arrival and anything happening was even longer than normal.
It was 1999 and the unlikely setting was The Triangle, the new leisure centre in Burgess Hill, which the Queen was officially to open. A large crowd filled the main area of the leisure centre. Here and there bird tables had sprung up, offering various unappetising canaps and sorry-looking biscuits. There were no seats anywhere and a few of the elderly guests were clearly finding it something of an ordeal to be on their feet so long.
One elderly woman looked to be finding the wait particularly difficult and was leaning rather heavily on one of the bird tables. I spotted one of the Palace flunkeys nearby, part of the forward party that was milling around.
Is there a seat we can get for this lady? I asked, pointing to the woman in question.
Nobody is allowed to sit down in the presence of the Queen, he told me grandly, and walked away, leaving me agape and the old woman still clinging to the bird table. Presumably she would have been allowed to fall down, if necessary. I discovered later that this archaic etiquette was not simply enforced for the Queen. Her sister, Princess Margaret, who demanded curtseys and head bows from those whose presence she graced, decreed that nobody was allowed to sit without her permission, and no one was allowed to leave before her.
Although Burgess Hill was not in my Lewes constituency, it was only just outside, and I had been invited along for the occasion by Ken Blanshard, the then Lib Dem leader of Mid Sussex District Council whose new leisure centre it was. To pass the time, Ken showed me around the centre, but when we got to the balcony overlooking the main area where everyone had congregated, our way was barred by another Palace flunkey.
You cant come along here, sir, he said firmly.
What do you mean? I challenged, and pointed to Ken. Its his leisure centre.
Im sorry, sir, nobody can look down on the Queen.
The Queen of course was not even there, and would not be for some time. It occurred to me afterwards that he, the flunkey, would be looking down on the Queen, but perhaps that did not count. I began to wonder how many centuries these royal rules of etiquette had existed and, more to the point, why they had not withered on the vine, like bear baiting and sending children up chimneys.
A similar thought had occurred to me a few years earlier when, as then leader of Lewes District Council, I had attended an event in my council ward at Middle Farm in Firle, a village just outside Lewes. Middle Farm is a rather splendid farm shop offering a great range of local produce, including wines and ciders, much of it organic. It is now a tourist attraction in its own right. The royal guest on that occasion was Prince Charles. Again, everyone had been required to arrive much too early, and we were ushered into a rather too small room, naturally without anywhere to sit. People were beginning to grumble about it when the door opened and some sort of equerry, who gave a fair impression of John Inman in
Next page