Also By Chuck Klosterman
Fargo Rock City: A Heavy Metal Odyssey in Rural Nrth Dakta
Scribner
1230 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Copyright 2003 by Chuck Klosterman
All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form.
33 was previously published in a different form in GQ. Appetite for Replication was previously published in a different form in The New York Times Magazine
SCRIBNER and design are trademarks of Macmillan Library Reference USA, Inc., used under license by Simon & Schuster, the publisher of this work.
DESIGNED BY ERICH HOBBING
Text set in Electra
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Klosterman, Chuck.
Sex, drugs, and cocoa puffs : a low culture manifesto / Chuck Klosterman.
p. cm.
1. Popular cultureUnited States. 2. United StatesCivilization1970. I. Title.
E169.12.K56 2003
306.0973dc21
2003045535
ISBN-13: 978-0-7432-5824-1
ISBN-10: 0-7432-5824-X
Visit us on the World Wide Web:
http://www.SimonSays.com
There are two ways to look at life.
Actually, thats not accurate; I suppose there are thousands of ways to look at life. But I tend to dwell on two of them. The first view is that nothing stays the same and that nothing is inherently connected, and that the only driving force in anyones life is entropy. The second is that everything pretty much stays the same (more or less) and that everything is completely connected, even if we dont realize it.
There are many mornings when I feel certain that the first perspective is irrefutably true: I wake up, I feel the inescapable oppression of the sunlight pouring through my bedroom window, and I am struck by the fact that I am alone. And that everyone is alone. And that everything I understood seven hours ago has already changed, and that I have to learn everything again.
I guess I am not a morning person.
However, that feeling always passes. In fact, its usually completely gone before lunch. Every new minute of every new day seems to vaguely improve. And I suspect thats because the alternative viewthat everything is ultimately like something else and that nothing and no one is autonomousis probably the greater truth. The math does check out; the numbers do add up. The connections might not be hard-wired into the superstructure to the universe, but it feels like they are whenever I put money into a jukebox and everybody in the bar suddenly seems to be having the same conversation. And in that last moment before I fall asleep each night, I understand Everything. The world is one interlocked machine, throbbing and pulsing as a flawless organism.
This is why I will always hate falling asleep.
What you are about to read is an evening book. It was written in those fleeting evening moments just before I fall asleep, and its built on this ethos: Nothing can be appreciated in a vacuum. Thats what accelerated culture does; it doesnt speed things up as much as it jams everything into the same wall of sound. But thats not necessarily tragic. The goal of being alive is to figure out what it means to be alive, and there is a myriad of ways to deduce that answer; I just happen to prefer examining the question through the context of Pamela Anderson and The Real World and Frosted Flakes. Its certainly no less plausible than trying to understand Kant or Wittgenstein. And while half of my brain worries that writing about Saved by the Bell and Memento will immediately seem as outdated as a 1983 book about Fantasy Island and Gerry Cooney, my minds better half knows that temporality is part of the truth. The subjects in this book are not the only ones that prove my point; theyre just the ones I happened to pick before I fell asleep.
In and of itself, nothing really matters. What matters is that nothing is ever in and of itself.
4 Every Dog Must Have His Every Day,
Every Drunk Must Have His Drink 0:42
13 The Awe-Inspiring Beauty of Tom Cruises Shattered,
Troll-like Face 1:51
All tracks by Chuck Klosterman and Crazy Horse, except The Lady and the Tiger (Lennon/McCartney) and This Is Zodiac Speaking (Klosterman /Desmond Child). Additional vocals by Shannon Hoon and Neko Case on Being Zack Morris. Produced by Bob Ezrin at Little Mountain Sound Studio LTD., Vancouver. No keyboards, synthesizers, or outboard gear were used in the typing of this manuscript.
Sol-ip-sism (solip sizem), n. Philos . The theory that only the self exists or can be proved to exist.
The Random House College Dictionary,
Revised Edition
I remember saying things, but I have no idea what was said. It was generally a friendly conversation.
Associated Press reporter Jack Sullivan, attempting to recount a 3 A.M. exchange we had at a dinner party and inadvertently describing the past ten years of my life.
1 This Is Emo 0:01
No woman will ever satisfy me. I know that now, and I would never try to deny it. But this is actually okay, because I will never satisfy a woman, either.
Should I be writing such thoughts? Perhaps not. Perhaps its a bad idea. I can definitely foresee a scenario where that first paragraph could come back to haunt me, especially if I somehow became marginally famous. If I become marginally famous, I will undoubtedly be interviewed by someone in the media, and the interviewer will inevitably ask, Fifteen years ago, you wrote that no woman could ever satisfy you. Now that youve been married for almost five years, are those words still true? And I will have to say, Oh, God no. Those were the words of an entirely different persona person whom I cant even relate to anymore. Honestly, I cant image an existence without _____. She satisfies me in ways that I never even considered. She saved my life, really.
Now, I will be lying. I wont really feel that way. But Ill certainly say those words, and Ill deliver them with the utmost sincerity, even though those sentiments will not be there. So then the interviewer will undoubtedly quote lines from this particular paragraph, thereby reminding me that I swore I would publicly deny my true feelings, and Ill chuckle and say, Come on, Mr. Rose. That was a literary device. You know I never really believed that.
But heres the thing: I do believe that. Its the truth now, and it will be in the future. And while Im not exactly happy about that truth, it doesnt make me sad, either. I know its not my fault.
Its no ones fault, really. Or maybe its everyones fault. It should be everyones fault, because its everyones problem. Well, okaynot everyone . Not boring people, and not the profoundly retarded. But whenever I meet dynamic, nonretarded Americans, I notice that they all seem to share a single unifying characteristic: the inability to experience the kind of mind-blowing, transcendent romantic relationship they perceive to be a normal part of living. And someone needs to take the fall for this. So instead of blaming no one for this (which is kind of cowardly) or blaming everyone (which is kind of meaningless), Im going to blame John Cusack.
I once loved a girl who almost loved me, but not as much as she loved John Cusack. Under certain circumstances, this would have been fine; Cusack is relatively good-looking, he seems like a pretty cool guy (he likes the Clash and the Who, at least), and he undoubtedly has millions of bones in the bank. If Cusack and I were competing for the same woman, I could easily accept losing. However, I dont really feel like John and I were competing for the girl Im referring to, inasmuch as her relationship to Cusack was confined to watching him as a two-dimensional projection, pretending to be characters who dont actually exist. Now, there was a time when I would have thought that detachment would have given me a huge advantage over Johnny C., inasmuch as my relationship with this woman included things like talking on the phone and nuzzling under umbrellas and eating pancakes. However, I have come to realize that I perceived this competition completely backward; it was definitely an unfair battle, but not in my favor. It was unfair in Cusacks favor. I never had a chance.