Arnold R. Eiser, MD, is currently a master of the American College of Physicians, adjunct senior fellow of the Leonard Davis Institute, adjunct fellow of the Center for Public Health Initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, and professor emeritus of medicine at Drexel University College of Medicine. A hallmark of Dr. Eisers career has been to gain breadth and depth in various medical specialties, integrating knowledge across fields and making discoveries possible through such breadth of knowledge. Formally trained in internal medicine and nephrology, he has served in leadership positions in medical schools in New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia, where he published articles in peer-reviewed journals and was named as one of the best doctors for his clinical expertise in each city. Over the past few years, Dr. Eiser has extensively researched the neurosciences and integrative neurology, coming to important new understandings that have led to publications in the neuroscience journal Brain Research and the American Journal of Medicine. With research collaborations extending across the United States and Canada, more scholarly publications are forthcoming. He serves as a reviewer for Alzheimers and Dementia Journal, Neurotoxicology, Neurochemistry International, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Ameri-can Journal of Medicine. He is the author of The Ethos of Medicine in Postmodern America: Philosophical, Cultural and Social Considerations (2014), which addressed the evolving changes in medical practice, research, and education in the twenty-first century.
Great thanks are due to my highly accomplished wife, Barbara J. A. Eiser, who has provided invaluable support and incisive editing, and to my daughter, Arielle, who offered her insights, both having improved several chapters. They have also graciously put up with me during the many hours and years that I have worked on this book. I wish to give a heartfelt thanks to my friend Bill Fuentevilla, who has helped me throughout this effort with his keen insights, helpful editing, and much-needed encouragement.
My cousin Melvin Vigman, MD, a neurologist, provided important observations improving this effort. My friend David Galinsky, MD, a geriatrician, likewise brought invaluable acumen and useful editing to this work. My friend Michael Parmer, MD, contributed helpful comments and his literary flair as well. My friend Marc Lipsitt offered useful insights. I am deeply grateful to all of them.
I wish to express thanks to Suzanne Staszak-Silva, my editor, for seeing the merit in this work. I am deeply appreciative of the dozens of researchers who spoke to me about their work in this and related fields. Much credit is due to the thousands of researchers who have done all the hard work of designing and executing the research, collecting and analyzing the data that produced the information that serves as the basis for the thoughts that I offer in this book.
Any man could, if he were so inclined, be the sculptor of his own brain.
Santiago Ramn y Cajal
RAMON Y CAJAL AND THE BIRTH OF NEUROSCIENCE
When and how did our knowledge of neurons, astrocytes, and glial cells begin to emerge? To ponder this evolution of knowledge, we need to turn to a remarkable man, Santiago Ramon y Cajal, born in 1852 in Petilla de Aragon, Navarre, Spain. Cajal was one of the first and foremost neuroscientists in the world and is regarded as a founder of the discipline. Not surprisingly, he was one of the first to consider the structure and functions of neuroglial cells. Cajal was a rebellious youth frequently expelled from school. (He probably would have been diagnosed in todays American schools with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], were he a student here.) Later he displayed skill as an artist and gymnast, but his father first apprenticed him to become a barber and shoemaker. Those efforts failed, as he was certainly ill suited to their repetitive nature. His father had, in the meantime, become an anatomy professor at the University of Zaragoza in Spain and encouraged Cajal to use his artistic talents to sketch anatomical figures and remains. This task resonated with Cajal, and he subsequently agreed to enroll in medical school there. Upon graduation and searching for adventure and some profit, he was recruited as a military physician. At the time, Spain was fighting the Ten Years War in Cuba, putting down the rebellion there. Cajal went off to the war, during which he contracted both tuberculosis and malaria, two life-threatening infections. Fortunately for the future of neuroscience, he remarkably recovered from those illnesses and, upon returning to civilian life, applied his military bonus to the purchase of a microscope. Peering through that scope (and another more refined one with a Zeiss lens provided by the Spanish government), Cajal developed the contiguous neuron theory of the nervous system. This concept holds that neurons communicate with one another while retaining their individual distinctive cell structure. Neuronal cells communicate with one another by forming synapses where electrochemical events build a burgeoning forest of branching communications. His sketches of the microscopic cells were crucial evidence of his theory and were so precise they are still used to educate neuroanatomists and physicians to this day.
Cajal originally hailed from the Aragon region of Spain, where the local character was known for its enduring tenacity. This characteristic, along with his meticulousness and creative imagination, was essential to his path-breaking studies of the nervous system and a prescient understanding of how the nervous system functions. For his efforts, he shared the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine with the Italian scientist Camille Golgi. Golgi had developed the staining techniques that led to visualizing neurons and other cells of the central nervous system (CNS). Cajal and Golgi had opposing views of how the brain worked, which led to quite an interesting Nobel awards ceremony where conflicting theories were advanced concurrently. Cajal, in keeping with his rebellious character, adopted and modified Golgis method of staining nerve cells that permitted him to peer more precisely into the nervous system. He accomplished this while serving as a professor at the University of Barcelona School of Medicine. (When in Barcelona a few years ago, I visited the historic amphitheater where Cajal lectured during his tenure there.)
Cajal also helped elucidate the physiological function of the astrocyte. He was the first to note that astrocytes played an important mediating role between neurons and the capillary blood vessels needed to maintain brain tissue as viable. The local microcirculation appeared to be physically dependent on astrocytes, and contemporary research in this area has provided further evidence that this is the case.
Another interesting point to note is that during human evolution brain size increased 300 percent from our ape forebears; yet this great increase was accompanied by only a 125 percent increase in the number of neurons. So, a greater number of astrocytes and other glial cells appear to have been important in the development of higher intelligence. Cajal himself must have possessed a great many (healthy) astrocytes to visualize how the brain functions so clearly over a hundred years ago!
I wish to suggest that we need to learn not only the basics of neuroscience from Cajal but also his healthy skepticism of the received wisdom of the academic establishment. If we were merely to adopt the conventional understanding of brain disease, we could be stuck in neutral as our current state of treating and preventing neurological disorders such as dementia and autism.