• Complain

Michael H. Armacost - Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections

Here you can read online Michael H. Armacost - Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2015, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Michael H. Armacost Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections
  • Book:
    Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Drawing on twenty-four years of experience in government, Michael H. Armacost explores how the contours of the U.S. presidential election system influence the content and conduct of American foreign policy. He examines how the nomination battle impels candidates to express deference to the foreign policy DNA of their party and may force an incumbent to make wholesale policy adjustments to fend off an intra-party challenge for the nomination. He describes the way reelection campaigns can prod a chief executive to fix long-neglected problems, kick intractable policy dilemmas down the road, settle for modest course corrections, or scapegoat others for policies gone awry.Armacost begins his book with the quest for the presidential nomination and then moves through the general election campaign, the ten-week transition period between Election Day and Inauguration Day, and the early months of a new administration. He notes that campaigns rarely illuminate the tough foreign policy choices that the leader of the nation must make, and he offers rare insight into the challenge of aligning the roles of an outgoing incumbent (who performs official duties despite ebbing power) and the incoming successor (who has no official role but possesses a fresh political mandate). He pays particular attention to the pressure for new presidents to act boldly abroad in the early months of his tenure, even before a national security team is in place, decision-making procedures are set, or policy priorities are firmly established. He concludes with an appraisal of the virtues and liabilities of the system, including suggestions for modestly adjusting some of its features while preserving its distinct character.

Michael H. Armacost: author's other books


Who wrote Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
BALLOTS, BULLETS, AND BARGAINS
BALLOTS, BULLETS, AND BARGAINS
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
MICHAEL H. ARMACOST
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK
Picture 1
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
PUBLISHERS SINCE 1893
NEW YORK CHICHESTER, WEST SUSSEX
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2015 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-53913-5
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Armacost, Michael H.
Ballots, bullets, and bargains : American foreign policy and presidential elections / Michael H. Armacost.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-231-16992-9 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-0-231-53913-5 (e-book)
1. PresidentsUnited StatesElectionHistory. 2. United StatesForeign relations19451989. 3. United StatesForeign relations1989 I. Title.
E183.A68 2015
324.973dc23
2014049266
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
COVER IMAGE: ALEX MAJOLI/MAGNUM PHOTOS
COVER DESIGN: CHANG JAE LEE
CONTENTS
I AM GRATEFUL TO MANY FOR THEIR HELP IN PREPARING THIS manuscript. A number of colleagues at Stanford University encouraged or indulged my commitment to work on this subject. They include Professor Gi-Wook Shin, director of the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center; Daniel Sneider, associate director for research at the Asia-Pacific Research Center; Professor Dave Brady, deputy director of the Hoover Institution; Professor David Kennedy, emeritus professor of history; and Professor Coit Blacker, senior fellow and former director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Longtime friend and Foreign Service colleague Don Keyser read much of the manuscript in draft and offered a host of helpful comments. Any errors that remain, are, of course, my responsibility alone.
I have also benefited from conversations on this subject with other colleagues, including Dr. Donald Emmerson, Dr. Thomas Fingar, and Professor Henry Rowen.
Debbie Warren and Irene Bryant have provided immeasurably valuable assistance in typing the manuscript and adapting it to the stylistic requirements of Columbia University Press.
I am deeply indebted to Anne Routon, senior editor, and Irene Pavitt, senior manuscript editor, both at Columbia University Press, and to copy editor Mary Sutherland. They professionally and cheerfully guided me through the publication process.
Last but surely not least, I am grateful for the patience and encouragement of my loving wife, Bonny, to whom the book is dedicated.
FOREIGN POLICY PERIODICALLY EXERTS A DECISIVE INFLUENCE ON presidential elections in the United States. Conversely, our presidential election systemthat is, the process through which we select party nominees, choose among them in a general election, and manage a transition for the victor from the rigors of a campaign to the practicalities of governanceexercises a substantial influence on the conduct and content of American foreign policy. The interplay between our election system and the substance of foreign policy is the subject of this book.
In one respect, of course, the assertion that our presidential election system influences foreign policy merely affirms the obvious. Presidents are ultimately responsible for making foreign policy; hence elections, which determine who will occupy the Oval Office, fundamentally shape the policies that the United States pursues beyond its shores.
But the process through which we select our presidents exerts its own impact on policy. So does the manner in which our Constitution and political traditions inform the way victorious candidates get their administrations up and running. This is intuitively evident to foreign policy professionals every time a presidential election looms.
During my twenty-four years in government, I served in the State Department, Defense Department, National Security Council staff, and American embassies in Manila and Tokyo. During that time, I witnessed six presidential sweepstakes. It was always clear when an election loomed. Foreign policy issues that appealed to powerful domestic constituencies moved up on the agenda. Negotiations requiring distasteful accommodations with foreigners tended to get kicked down the road. If the United States was involved in armed conflict, presidents sought more urgently to find a formula for winning or settling. Defense budgets usually soared. Major exporters of manufactured goods and services enjoyed easier access to subsidies or protection from foreign competitors. Politically powerful ethnic groupswhether Jews, African Americans, Hispanics, Taiwanese, Greeks, Cubans, Armenians, or othersattracted special attention. The White House search for diplomatic successes intensified. So did the spinning to rationalize foreign policy setbacks or obfuscate failures.
There is nothing particularly surprising about this. Politics does not invariably trump strategy during presidential election campaigns. But elections place foreign policy choices in a context in which their domestic political consequences acquire greater weight. In that sense, foreign policy is an extension of domestic politics.
I share with many foreign policy professionals a certain disquiet about some of the effects of our electoral system on policyfor example, the simplification of complex diplomatic issues into bumper-sticker-size campaign slogans, the enhanced influence of political advisers more concerned with the appeal of foreign policy initiatives at home than their efficacy abroad, and the prolonged time outs or lulls that campaigns generally impose on the conduct of diplomacy.
Yet, throughout my career in government, I generally welcomed elections as action-forcing eventsoccasions that could have a salutary effect on our foreign policy. After all, they bring fresh blood and new ideas into the policy-making circuit. They may persuade an incumbent belatedly to tackle with urgency some issues that have been long neglected. When the country is on the wrong track, elections encourage and facilitate course corrections. When the gap between foreign policy aims and the resources devoted to their achievement becomes too wide, elections may spur efforts to find a more sustainable balance between ends and means. They can provide practical incentives to accelerate the implementation of promising projects and to wrap up or wind down policy endeavors that are costly yet ineffectual. In short, elections establish regular deadlines for revisiting campaign promises, assessing results, enforcing accountability, and selecting new management.
While serving overseas, I was reminded that our presidential elections unfold in a gigantic echo chamber. Candidates generally speak to domestic constituencies as if outsiders were not listening in. Rhetoric directed at American voters can have an unfortunateeven toxicimpact abroad as contenders pander to local prejudices, express disdain for foreign leaders, and volunteer gratuitous and often uncharitable judgments about the institutions and policies of particular foreign countries.
No countrys elections are observed by foreigners with more attentiveness and nervousness than ours. For countries that enjoy the support of powerful voting blocs in the United States, our elections offer golden opportunities to entice new commitments or solicit new subventions from Washington. For adversaries like the Soviet Union during the Cold War, or Iran now, presidential campaigns provoke predictable expressions of animosity, muscular threats, and occasional hints of a readiness to talk. Commercial rivals like Japan in the 1980s and China today associate our campaigns with demands for fair trade, embroidered with threats of retaliatory measures. Other countries attract attention for local political reasons. For decades, Republican candidates growled at Fidel Castro to rally Cuban American voters in Florida; Democratic candidates snarled at Turkey to harvest Armenian American votes in California. And contenders from both parties made the obligatory campaign swing through Israel, Ireland, and Italy.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections»

Look at similar books to Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ballots, Bullets, and Bargains: American Foreign Policy and Presidential Elections and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.