HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CATHOLIC TRADITION
Human Rights and the Catholic Tradition
Donald J. Dietrich
First published 2007 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 2007 by Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2007017308
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Dietrich, Donald J., 1941
Human rights and the Catholic tradition / Donald J. Dietrich.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-7658-0378-8
1. Human rightsReligious aspectsCatholic Church. 2. Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)Germany. 3. JudaismRelationsCatholic Church. 4. Catholic ChurchRelationsJudaism. I. Title.
BX1795.H85D54 2007
282'.4309043dc22
2007017308
ISBN 13: 978-0-7658-0378-8 (hbk)
To
Linda
This book owes a great deal to Otto Pflanze, my Doktorvater , who has been instrumental over the years in shaping my understanding of how Catholics in Germany during the last two centuries identified themselves both as citizens of their state and as followers of their faith.
Irving Louis Horowitz, university professor and Hannah Arendt Distinguished Professor of sociology and political science at Rutgers, has been invaluable to me in illuminating the dynamics behind politically sanctioned murder.
I am also indebted to my colleagues and students at Boston College, who, with their probing insights into the Shoah, have helped my research to progress productively.
The gracious administrators at Boston College have made available to me the time needed for meaningful research and writing. The Bernard A. Stotsky/George and Bess Stotsky Endowed Research Fund has provided annually the necessary funds that have made it possible for me to undertake this research and writing. Stephen Strempek assiduously helped to type the manuscript.
Most especially, I want to thank Linda, my wife, for her unfailing support and encouragement of my work. I will always cherish her wit and wisdom.
I
Social psychologists and historians continue to ask how the Holocaust can be explained and comprehended. Milgram, for example, has maintained that personality was not the sole determinant. A conducive situation was required. Social conditions rather than just monstrous people seem needed to produce atrocious deeds. In the midst of appropriate social conditions, decent, ordinary people can act cruelly. The modern German Catholic tradition favoring personalism and contextualization was nurtured during the nineteenth century and the Third Reich. Ultimately, this German Catholic theology contributed to the Catholic conception of human rights that emerged during and after Vatican II.
Since the French Revolution, cultural and sociopolitical conversations in Europe and the United States have been dominated by what it means to be human. Major wars, the Holocaust, policies of sanctioned murder, and the physical violations of human lives have compelled theologians and other scholars to reflect on the place of God in the human condition. An understanding of what a human ought to be or do generally rests on what a human being is perceived as: individualistic or social, rational or emotional, violent or peaceful, biologically or socially constructed, or even organized in a more intricate combination of several factors. Autonomous humans would be responsible for their world and for constructing their cultural, social, and political identity.
The Holocaust and other occurrences of sanctioned murder serve as a reminder of the enormous political and life-threatening dangers of any reductionistic anthropological vision. Just as theological anthropology explores the relations between ideas about human existence and Gods providence, ethical anthropology examines the connections between humans and their values. Both approaches raise epistemological questions since our perspectives on human nature shape our ideas about how we know what we know to be true.
Political ethics can be understood as a type of practical or applied morality that is derived from abstract norms to help persons concretely engage their social world. Sociopolitical ethics can be seen as lived ethics, which stress how ideas are shaped in real life situations. They can change in reaction to world events, but the cognitive processes that are part of the religious tradition rarely disappear.
II
Most kinds of ethical suppositions about what it means to be human and to adhere to specific values come embedded in narrativesstories about humanitys origin, purpose, and destiny. For most people, values, priorities, and visions of what they ought to be and do as well as how their communities ought to be shaped begin in response to concrete situations and conclude in abstract, formally stated maxims. Frequently, such abstract ethical concepts emerge from a general notion of what the world is, what people are like, where they come from, and what is to be their destiny, all of which can be synthesized within a narrative tradition that can nurture lived ethics. Only in light of such narratives can we make sense of our ideas about right and wrong in our communities. From this perspective Jim Cheney, for example, has asserted that to contextualize an ethical deliberation is to provide a narrative from which a solution to an ethical dilemma naturally emerges.
Mark Johnson addresses this same issue at length and claims that humans continually organize and reorganize their experiences. To respond to this concern, many contemporary theologians have begun stressing pluralism and change, acknowledging that all of humanitys history probably does not fit neatly into an overarching story. Narrative ethics embodying living tradition are not simple abstractions and can guide peoples lives and values but only if these stories are understood as partial, contextual, and subject to change.
Since religious ethics are lived ethics, the narrative view of self is almost necessarily that of a social self.
Such scholars as David Hollinger, for example, have cited the epistemological heritage of the Enlightenment as a necessary secular foundation for the acceptance and implementation of the liberal values that have helped shape Western society. The Enlightenment assisted in establishing the modern parameters for the discussion of rights. While they have their own limitations, Enlightenment notions of human rights posit, nevertheless, an intrinsic dignity. Such a secular perspective has been connected through recent personalistic, Catholic thought to a more An analysis of resistance in the Third Reich, the emergence of a person-sensitive human anthropology that became encapsulated in the works of German Catholic theologians, and an ecclesiology nurtured by the Bible and by the church fathers seem to be important components in the current human rights narrative paradigm developed by Catholics.