A.2 Euclidean Constructions
We noted, in Section 2.3, that the first three of Euclids postulates state the primitive constructions from which all other constructions in the Elements are to be compounded. The first two of these postulates tell us what we can do with a Euclidean straightedge; we are permitted to draw as much as may be desired of the straight line determined by two given points. The third postulate tells us what we can do with Euclidean compasses; we are permitted to draw the circle of given center and passing through a given point. Note that neither instrument is to be used for transferring distances. This means that the straightedge cannot be marked, and the compasses must be regarded as having the characteristic that if one or both points be lifted from the paper, the instrument immediately collapses. For this reason, Euclidean compasses are often referred to as collapsing compasses ; they differ from modern compasses , which retain their opening and hence can be used as dividers for transferring distances. It would seem that modern compasses might be more powerful than the collapsing compasses. Curiously enough, such turns out not to be true; any construction performable with the modern compasses can also be carried out (in perhaps a longer way) by means of the collapsing compasses. We prove this fact as our first theorem.
Theorem 1 The collapsing and modern compasses are equivalent.
The circle with center O and passing through a given point C will be denoted by O ( C ), and the circle with center O and radius equal to a given segment AB will be denoted by O ( AB ). To prove the theorem it suffices to show that we may, with collapsing compasses, construct any circle O ( AB ). This may be accomplished as follows (see ). Draw circles A ( O ) and O ( A ) to intersect in D and E ; draw circles D ( B ) and E ( B ) to intersect again in F; draw circle O ( F ). It is an easy matter to prove that OF = AB , whence circle O ( F ) is circle O ( AB ).
Note: In view of Theorem 1, we may dispense with the Euclidean, or collapsing, compasses, and in their place employ the simpler modern compasses. We are assured that the set of constructions performable with straightedge and modern compasses is the same as the set performable with straightedge and Euclidean compasses.
We now proceed to establish a chain of theorems that will furnish us with a criterion for Euclidean constructibility. It turns out that the criterion is algebraic in nature. After the criterion is established, we shall apply it to prove that the three famous construction problems of antiquity (trisection of a general angle, duplication of a cube, and squaring of a circle) are impossible with Euclidean tools. A proof of this fact was not discovered until the nineteenth century, more than two thousand years after the original problems had been proposed.
Theorem 2 Given line segments of lengths a and b, and a unit segment, we can construct with Euclidean tools segments of lengths a + b, |ab|, ab, a/b, and a.
The first two constructions are trivial; the last three are apparent from .
Definition 1 Let a 1,... , a n be a given nonempty set of distinct real nonzero numbers, and let F 0 denote the set of all numbers each of which can be obtained from a 1,... , a n by a finite number of additions, subtractions, multiplications, and permissible divisions. Since F 0 is closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and permissible division, F 0 is a number field (see Section 5.1); it will be called the number field generated by a 1, ... , a n . The number field generated by the number 1 will be denoted by R 0.
Theorem 3 R0 is the field of all rational numbers. Every number field contains R0 as a subfield.
The proof is simple and is left to the reader.