• Complain

Ray Fleming - God Hates Science

Here you can read online Ray Fleming - God Hates Science full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    God Hates Science
  • Author:
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

God Hates Science: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "God Hates Science" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

After exposing numerous physics fallacies in The 100 Greatest Lies in Physics Ray Fleming has turned his attention to exposing religion and arguments for the existence of gods in God Hates Science. It begins with a dissection of the laughably unscientific creation myth from the Book of Genesis, where the very idea of a beginning is a fallacy. Then he sets about to debunk all the popular arguments for existence such as, the argument from beauty, intelligent design, the ontological argument, biological complexity, and dozens more. He then makes an extensive refutation of the fine-tuning argument by showing in detail how the physical constants arise from zero-point energy. The constants are not fine-tunable. Saving the best for last, he constructs a philosophical argument proving the universe exists by default along with its zero-point energy and constants, and they account for everything. And he follows that with seven proofs of non-existence. Yes, it is possible to prove something doesnt exist, and he explains how. The writing is sometimes light hearted sprinkled with frequent pointed attacks, such as his reference to a soul as a brainless mind, an oxymoron. The book gets increasingly more serious as it progresses to the science arguments. The science, based on his book The Zero-Point Universe, will interest those who wish to better understand the properties of space through quantum field theory.

Ray Fleming: author's other books


Who wrote God Hates Science? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

God Hates Science — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "God Hates Science" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
God Hates Science

By

Ray Fleming


This publication was published, written, edited, and illustrated by Ray Fleming with additional editing by Ward Lowe.

Copyright 2017 by Ray Fleming

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Ray Fleming.

Published in the United States of America

ISBN-10: 197960794X

ISBN-13: 978-1979607940


Acknowledgement
This book is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Madalyn Murray OHair, her son Jon, and granddaughter-daughter Robin, and their contributions toward their goal of a religion-free society. They encouraged me to take a stand for science and reason.

.


CONTENTS

Chapter 1

In the Beginning

Chapter 2

The Fallacy of Beauty

Chapter 3

God, Your Farts Stink

Chapter 4

The Fallacy of Purpose

Chapter 5

The Fallacy of Dualism

Chapter 6

The Afterlife Lie

Chapter 7

Ethics and Morality

Chapter 8

Coincidences

Chapter 9

Cause and Effect, and Free Will

Chapter 10

Science and Reason

Chapter 11

God Science

Chapter 12

The Physical Constants

Chapter 13

The Big Bang

Chapter 14

Bad Logic

Chapter 15

Biological Complexity

Chapter 16

The God Checklist

Chapter 17

Spinozas Universe

Chapter 18

Proofs of Non-Existence

Chapter 19

God Believers Hate Science and Reason

Appendix to Chapter 12

Index of Arguments



Chapter 1: In the Beginning

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light, and there was light.

The Book of Genesis

Before any beginning, there was the universe. And after an unmeasurable number of years, the universe produced humans, who then created gods in their own image. Humans came up with numerous wonderful tales about their fictitious gods. These tales were passed down orally for centuries, before being put into writing. Many of these religious texts survive until today. They are frequently attributed to the god or gods they are written about, or human authors are said to have been divinely inspired to write the words dictated by their particular god.

These tales vary greatly, as different cultures had different gods, or sets of gods, and different traditions. But in almost every god story, there is a creation myth. While some of these myths have details in common, the one thing they certainly have in common is that they are wrong. They are not only wrong because a hypothetical god is not necessary to explain the existence of the universe, but the details are not consistent with scientific evidence. Even the idea that a creation is needed is wrong.

The most widely read religious creation myth is from the Book of Genesis, which is the first book of the Hebrew and Christian bibles. Genesis represents the beliefs of the single largest collective organized religious group, the Christians, and since the god of Islam is also the god of Abraham, it represents beliefs of the second largest religious group as well. Including Judaism, Abrahamic religions represent the god beliefs of over 4 billion people out of approximately 7.5 billion people on Earth.

Additional people have been taught Abrahamic myths and dogma, while some have read about them out of curiosity. So, well over 4 billion people are familiar with at least some Abrahamic religious dogma and in particular the story from Genesis.

A small housekeeping detail: The word god in the title and throughout this book is used in the hypothetical sense. It would be awkward to read hypothetical god every time the god concept comes up, so instead of hypothetical god, the text of this book frequently reads god.

The Book of Genesis is a great place to test the Abrahamic gods scientific knowledge or, more precisely, the scientific knowledge of its followers. What we find from this small sample of religious text is that it is not consistent with scientific evidence. In many instances, it does not even stand up to basic logic tests. While this is admittedly a small sample size, one can readily analyze other texts of these and other religions and see that the non-scientific and illogical nature of religious texts is a general problem with all of them.

Genesis 1:1a. In the beginning

The first two words are innocuous, but in writing the third word, the first important word in the Bible, god has already made its first big mistake. It assumed there is a beginning. Note that, while the Abrahamic god is normally referred to in the masculine, throughout this book god will be referred to as it, since a hypothetical solitary non-physical god must be an asexual being.

A belief in a beginning is not scientifically valid as it violates the principle of conservation of energy. The energy that exists today must have always existed. That includes the energy of the quantum field that exists everywhere in space. And, in the zero-point energy, as Einstein called it, the energy in a single cubic centimeter of space is greater than all the masses of all the visible stars and galaxies.

I know some of you are thinking, But, but, but, the Big Bang. That issue will be discussed in Chapter 13.

Genesis 1:1b. In the beginning God

Now we are four words into Genesis and god has multiplied its scientific and logical errors many times over. Here is a list of logical mistakes god made thus far, and this list is by no means complete.

  • God says there was a beginning when god is also claiming that it already existed, so this was obviously not the beginning. If there was a beginning, it would have to occur when god or something else came into existence.
  • Following the Genesis scenario, which presumes both a beginning and that god came first, the beginning would be when god was created.
  • In order to meet both requirements that there was a beginning and god came first, god could not have existed for infinity.
  • The idea that god had a beginning, begs the question of who or what created god.
  • Space is required to have existed in the past, since it exists now, and the energy of all the space in the universe must be conserved.
  • There is nothing scientific or logical that enables a god to be created before the energy of space.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «God Hates Science»

Look at similar books to God Hates Science. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «God Hates Science»

Discussion, reviews of the book God Hates Science and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.