Contents
- Introduction (from Article 313)
- Article 275. Planet X debris field impacting earth
- Article 282. Earth in upheaval: magma rising from beneath
- Article 291. The sun disappears: day turns into night
- Article 304. Can Planet X cause asteroid type impacts?
- Article 288. Image of the center of the Milky Way Galaxy reveals how the universe works
- Article 316. A rogue planet with a magnetic field 200 times stronger than Jupiters
- Article 317. Planet X System: Brown and Black Dwarfs with high magnetic field
- Article 323. Planet X System Gravity: why has the earth not been destroyed?
- Article 324. Planet X causes the sun to be darkened
- Article 336. Stellar nebular cloud structure
- Article 337. Heat and gravitational photon energy
- Article 338. The Planet X effect: heating and ionization in contact regions
- Article 339. Planet X and the Interstellar Medium: can we leave the Solar System?
- Article 347. Gravity wave on Venus suggests Planet X presence
- Article 348. Venus bulge: gravitational waves and hollow planets
- Article 335. Biological and Ecological weapons in use against us
- Article 342. The enemy: Why are bio and eco-weapons being used against us?
Books previously published
Book 1: Planet X: the awakening is now.
Book 2: The Planet X Report 2017: Photographic Evidence.
Book 3: Planet X Revealed Gravity and Light.
Book 4: The Sun Simulator
Book 5: Chemtrails: The Silent Killer.
Book 6: Planet X Physicist Articles: Part 1
Book 7: Planet X: The effects on the Earth and the Sun
Chapter 1
Introduction
I recently was asked in a comment why I think other astrophysicists do not support me. I think this is a very interesting and valid question. Why would any astrophysicist ignore the irrefutable evidence that there is a system of objects in the Solar System, which are found in the Suns corona, and that is affecting our planet in unprecedented and cataclysmic ways? Evidence to their presence is undeniable and some of this evidence is shown below.
Figure 1.1 . A Planet X Object or Stellar Core appears in the Suns corona. The object is striped and a size comparison with the Sun reveals that it is about 4 times larger than the earth.
Figure 1.2. A spherical object moves away from the Sun within CME material in this CACTus image.
Figure 1.3: SDO image in the 171 angstrom wavelength from October 13 th, 2017 showing a dark Stellar Core, which appears to be about half of the size of Jupiter.
Who can deny that these objects are in the Suns corona? They are obviously there and anyone that says that they are not is either blind has their eyes closed or is a liar.
Figure 1.4. Yohkoh Satellite x-ray images from December 14 th, 2001 showing an object which emits x-rays and cannot, therefore, be the moon eclipsing the Sun. X-rays are emitted from the surface, on the objects left hemisphere close to the equator, so that it forms curved contours, which indicate the curvature of the object. These seemed to also be slightly raised over the rest of the surface and indicate a layer of material covering this region of the objects surface.
But some have tried to claim that this object is the moon since a lunar eclipse was supposed to happen on this day. Now, the moon does not emit x rays, only stars are hot enough to emit x rays, but the moon does scatter a few x rays, so that in a very long exposure soft x ray image, the moon may look as shown in figure 5 below.
Figure 1.5. Image of the moon in soft x-rays: This is a long exposure and therefore low-resolution image of the moon, no contours or surface features of the moon can be distinguished. The number of scattered x rays from the moons dark side is extremely low.
Figure 1.6 . Because of the low amount of scattered x ray light, it is necessary to use a very long exposure to obtain soft x ray images of the moon. The exposure time for the image shown in figure 5, from June 29, 1990, is 1899 seconds or 31 minutes and 39 seconds.
The Yohkoh images are high-resolution images and therefore with an exposure time of the order of 1 second or less. The object in the right image, in figure 3, is almost completely eclipsing the Sun and therefore we are looking at its dark side. When we compare this image with the image of the moon we see that many more x-rays have been captured coming from the surface of the object than have been captured coming from the moons night side, in a time interval which nearly 2000 times less than the exposure time for the moon image, which indicates that the object is emitting x-rays, and not scattering them, and cannot therefore be the moon. Another factor, which clearly shows that this object is emitting x-rays and cannot possibly be the moon, is the fact that surface contours can be seen from the captured x-rays. Scattered x-rays are scattered in random directions and therefore no resolution of surface features are possible but emitted x-rays allow surface features to be resolved once detected. Thus, the fact that the objects surface features, such as the raised layer, over the equator, can be seen, is another factor indicating that the object emits x-rays and cannot be the moon.
Now, that we have an object clearly between the Sun and the Earth that cannot be the moon and is emitting x-rays indicating that it must either be very hot, or it is highly ionized due to a high electric field, what is it? What other objects in the Solar System are between the Earth and the Sun, Venus, and Mercury? But these are tiny planets in comparisson with the Sun, which cannot eclipse the Sun in the way this object is eclipsing it. So what is it? Who among the astronomers and astrophysicists and all the NASA scientists can answer this simple question? What is this object when it cannot be the moon, cannot be Venus and cannot be Mercury? The silence is deafening.
Do they support my research? No, they do not? Do they explain what these objects are? No, they do not. Why are they silent? They are silent because they cannot deny what is obvious and they remain silent because they are afraid. They are afraid of what will happen to them, if they start telling the truth, because, at a minimum, they will lose access to telescopes and will not be able to continue their research, which was what happened to Halton Arp, due to his work on redshift, which clearly falsified the Big Bang model. They will most likley be blocked from publishing their research by the peer review system, which also happened to Halton Arp, as he explains in his book Seeing Red. This is what the peer review system is all about. The peer review system is for the purpose of keeping the truth out of mainstream scientific research and there are many scientists who agree with that statement, Einstein was among them, as he simply withdrew his papers if anyone suggested that it would be seent for peer review. Think about it? How can truly novel ideas, which will take scientific thought forward, be kept out of mainstream physics? Simply make sure that nothing gets published in the good established papers by letting those with old conventional ideas, the peers, decide what is good research and what is not good research. That cannot be left up to the readers, of course, that would lead to too much innovation, too much truth. The peers simply do not allow anything to be published that does not agree with comtempory thought and therefore innovation and truth are removed.
Next page