• Complain

Lucas Graves - Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism

Here you can read online Lucas Graves - Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Art / Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Lucas Graves Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism
  • Book:
    Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Over the past decade, American outlets such as PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, and the Washington Posts Fact Checker have shaken up the political world by holding public figures accountable for what they say. Cited across social and national news media, these verdicts can rattle a political campaign and send the White House press corps scrambling. Yet fact-checking is a fraught kind of journalism, one that challenges reporters traditional roles as objective observers and places them at the center of white-hot, real-time debates. As these journalists are the first to admit, in a hyperpartisan world, facts can easily slip into fiction, and decisions about which claims to investigate and how to judge them are frequently denounced as unfair play.
Deciding Whats True draws on Lucas Gravess unique access to the members of the newsrooms leading this movement. Graves vividly recounts the routines of journalists at three of these hyperconnected, technologically innovative organizations and what informs their approach to a story. Graves also plots a compelling, personality-driven history of the fact-checking movement and its recent evolution from the blogosphere, reflecting on its revolutionary remaking of journalistic ethics and practice. His book demonstrates the ways these rising organizations depend on professional networks and media partnerships yet have also made inroads with the academic and philanthropic worlds. These networks have become a vital source of influence as fact-checking spreads around the world.

Lucas Graves: author's other books


Who wrote Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
DECIDING WHATS TRUE DECIDING WHATS TRUE THE RISE OF POLITICAL FACT-CHECKING - photo 1
DECIDING WHATS TRUE
DECIDING
WHATS
TRUE
THE RISE OF POLITICAL FACT-CHECKING IN AMERICAN JOURNALISM
LUCAS GRAVES
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS New York
Picture 2
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
PUBLISHERS SINCE 1893
NEW YORK CHICHESTER, WEST SUSSEX
CUP.COLUMBIA.EDU
Copyright 2016 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-54222-7
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Graves, Lucas, 1970 author.
Title: Deciding whats true : the rise of political fact-checking in American
journalism / Lucas Graves.
Description: New York : Columbia University Press, [2016] | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016005306 (print) | LCCN 2016009516 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780231175067 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231175074
(pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231542227 (e-book) | ISBN 9780231542227 ()
Subjects: LCSH: JournalismObjectivity. | Journalistic ethics.
Classification: LCC PN4784.O24 G73 2016 (print) | LCC PN4784.O24
(ebook) | DDC 302.23dc23
LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016005306
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
COVER DESIGN: CHANG JAE LEE
COVER IMAGE : JON GREENBERG
References to websites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared.
CONTENTS
THIS BOOK WOULDNT EXIST WITHOUT THE INDULGENCE OF MANY people, beginning with its protagonists. The exceptional candor and generosity of the fact-checkers and other journalists featured in these pages opened a window onto a new professional world. I owe special thanks to Bill Adair and Angie Drobnic Holan of PolitiFact, Brooks Jackson and Eugene Kiely of FactCheck.org, and Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post.
The research for this book began at Columbia University, where two mentors provided invaluable guidance and support. Michael Schudson was the ideal advisor, patient and wise, always knowing more than he said and saying exactly what was needed. I hope these chapters reflect the influence of his unusually graceful way of thinking. David Stark never failed to ask the question that cast everything in a new light; his interest, advice, and sharp eye were an enormous asset. I also benefited from the incisive comments and questions of Todd Gitlin, Victor Pickard, and Stephen Reese, and of Herb Gans, who volunteered to read the final product. All of these thoughtful critiques helped greatly to carry the project forward.
At Columbia I received valuable support in David Starks CODES seminar and from many friends in the Sociology Department, which became a second home; thanks especially to Monique Girard and Josh Whitford. On the remarkable faculty in our small, boundary-crossing Communications Program, I owe special thanks to Andie Tucher and Frank Moretti, whose confidence made all the difference early on. Frank had a wide embrace and he is missed by all of us. Chris Anderson, Jonah Bossewitch, Laura Forlano, Tom Glaisyer, Phil Kay, John Kelly, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, Ruth Palmer, Ben Peters, Soomin Seo, Julia Sonnevend, Olivier Sylvain, Madiha Tahir, and Joost van Dreunen were valued comrades in and out of the J-school basement.
A number of organizations have supported this project directly or indirectly. Funds for research, travel, and writing came from the Poynter Institute, the Open Society Foundations, the Democracy Fund, the Omidyar Network, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Mellon Graduate Fellows program at the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy. A fellowship with the New America Foundation in Washington, DC, provided crucial support at an early stage; Im indebted to Steve Coll and Tom Glaisyer for their interest. Special thanks also go to Tom Rosenstiel, Jane Elizabeth, and Jeff Sonderman at the American Press Institute in Reston, Virginia, whose engagement has been vital for researchers who study fact-checking. In that community Ive benefited from conversations and collaboration with Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler, Michelle Amazeen, Emily Thorson, Ashley Muddiman, and Talia Stroud.
An army of friends in New York and Madison read parts of this book at various stages. Peter Asaro, Chris Anderson, Katherine Brown, Emily Callaci, Kathryn Ciancia, Biella Coleman, Judd Kinzley, Nicole Nelson, Ruth Palmer, Laura Portwood-Stacer, Sue Robinson, Annie Rudd, Julia Sonnevend, Molly Wright Steenson, and Stephen Young all gave valuable feedback on chapter drafts. Christina Dunbar-Hester influenced this undertaking from start to finish and was always ready with a raised eyebrow when I needed it most. My editor at Columbia University Press, Philip Leventhal, has been a calm and sure guide; thanks also to Miriam Grossman. Patti Bower and Michael Haskell performed remarkable feats of copyediting. I owe a tremendous debt to two anonymous reviewers and to my friend Rasmus Kleis Nielsen for their incisive and thoughtful comments on the final draft. This book is far better as a result.
Many others aided and abetted this work at various points. My colleagues in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at UWMadison helped in ways great and small; thanks especially to Sue Robinson, Lew Friedland, Shawnika Hull, Al Gunther, and the late, extraordinary James L. Baughman. Jessica Faule, Rich Garella, Omar Serageldin, Ranjit Singh, and Alix Burns put me up (and put up with me) during numerous research trips. Ingrid Erickson lent me her apartment in Harlem. Meghan Chua and Caitlin Cieslik-Miskimen assisted ably with editing, research, and transcription. Kate Fink and Patrice Kohl handled successive versions of the content analysis in . Patricia Connelly offered to copyedit the whole thing one Christmas, and then did it. My mother, Janice Olson, lent her editing and design talents, her reassuringly strong views, and her unflagging support. Anjali Bhasin was patient, cheerful, and wise. Molly Steenson and Emily Callaci commiserated often and well.
Ive been lucky throughout to be surrounded by an extended family thats close by even when Im notPatricia, Jessie, Alan, Greta, Mardi, the Olsons, and most of all my parents, Dave and Jan. This is for them.
In memory of Michael Graves.
A Brazen Lie?
THE 2012 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL RACE ENDED ACCORDING TO THE forecast, with a decisive victory for Barack Obama. But the closing days did bring one unusual development: the most emphatic collective debunking of a major campaign claim in the modern history of American journalism. The episode presaged what would be ubiquitous political fact-checking in the primaries four years later, when reporters instincts were sharpened by unusually wild rhetoric from several political outsidersin particular a famous real estate mogul and reality TV star. In hindsight, it was all the more remarkable for centering on a comparatively mild campaign claim from the consummate establishment candidate.
Romneys new attack ad, called Who Will Do More?, seized on a news bulletin out of Detroit to cast the governments role in a different light. Over images of old sedans being flattened by an industrial press, a male voice offered a harsh appraisal of the White Houses record: Obama took GM and Chrysler into bankruptcy and sold Chrysler to the Italians, who are going to build Jeeps in China. As evidence for the last point, the ad flashed an out-of-context excerpt from a recent financial news item reporting that Chrysler plans to return Jeep output to China.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism»

Look at similar books to Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism»

Discussion, reviews of the book Deciding Whats True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.