• Complain

Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle - Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law

Here you can read online Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle - Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: buch & netz, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law
  • Book:
    Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    buch & netz
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle: author's other books


Who wrote Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization
Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering from the
Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law
Dissertation at the Faculty of Law of the University of Zurich
to obtain a Doctoral degree
Ideation Conceptualization Realization Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law - image 1
submitted by:
MLaw Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle
of Weggis LU
supervised by:
Prof. Dr. iur. Florent Thouvenin
and
Prof. Dr. iur. Andreas Heinemann
Ideation Conceptualization Realization Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law - image 2
Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering from the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law by Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.
2021 CC BY-NC-ND (Work), CC BY-SA (Text)
Author: Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle
Publisher: EIZ Publishing
Production, Set & Distribution: buch & netz (buchundnetz.com)
Illustrations: Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle, Robin Leins
ISBN:
978-3-03805-409-2 (Print Softcover)
978-3-03805-412-2 (Print Hardcover)
978-3-03805-444-3 (PDF)
978-3-03805-445-0 (ePub)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36862/eiz-409
Version: 1.05 20211008
The dissertation was submitted by Sarah Leins-Zurmuehle and adopted by the Faculty of Law of the University of Zurich, represented by Dean Prof. Dr. Brigitte Tag, on May 27, 2020.
It was supervised by Prof. Dr. iur. Florent Thouvenin and Prof. Dr. iur. Andreas Heinemann.
The open access publication of this book has been published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF).
This work is available in print and various digital formats in OpenAccess. Additional information is available at: https://eizpublishing.com/publikationen/ideation-conceptualization-realization/.
1
In the end nobody knows how its done how art is made. It cant be explained. () Understanding a tool doesnt explain the magic of creation. Nothing can.
Quote by David Hockney, an English artist, issued in an interview with Martin Gayford of the Telegraph, published on September 22, 2001, available at (retrieved September 6, 2021).
Contents
2
Acknowledgements
This book is the result of research for my doctoral thesis at the University of Zurich.
In the course of my dissertation project, I benefitted from the support and advice of many researchers and practitioners:
First of all, I would like to thank my academic supervisors and Ph.D. advisors Prof. Dr. iur. Florent Thouvenin and Prof. Dr. iur. Andreas Heinemann. Prof. Dr. iur. Florent Thouvenins sharp way of thinking and cross-linked view challenged me to improve this thesis to its final extent. He generously shared his knowledge and helped me to focus on the important questions. Prof. Dr. iur. Andreas Heinemann has supported my research since the beginning, although at first not in an official role. His inspiring, always constructive, helpful, calm and professional nature allowed me to find confidence in my research question.
Another person without whose work my thesis would not have reached its desired form is Dr. phil. Claudia Vorheyer, former Senior Assistant at the Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich. She supported me tenaciously throughout my interdisciplinary research and showed me where to turn. Her infinite knowledge and know-how of sociological methodology is inspiring and her enthusiasm contagious. Thank you, Claudia, for your patience and sincere support. I know you are going to be a wonderful professor!
I would also like to thank the Europa Institute at the University of Zurich (EIZ) for making this publication possible and particularly Atty. Dr. iur. Tobias Baumgartner, LL.M., and MLaw Michael Mayer for collaborating in an exceptionally supportive and constructive manner, enabling me to finalize and publish this thesis.
On the way, I met so many practitioners who were very supportive. I want to express my admiration for the lawyers, project managers and developers working in this field in an inventive and creative manner. My grateful thanks go out to all the (anonymized) interview candidates and companies who gave me their time and voluntarily shared their knowledge. Further thanks go to those who gave me initial input and helped me to connect with the right people. My particular thanks go to PD Dr. sc. Matthias Stuermer, dipl. HTL. Ing. Frans van der Reijden, Atty. Dr. iur. Georg Rauber, Atty. Dr. iur. Rolf auf der Maur, Atty. Dr. iur. Thomas Steiner, LL.M., and Atty. Dr. iur. Martin Eckert. I want to say a special thank you to Atty. Dr. iur. Wolfgang Straub, LL.M., who supported me with his extraordinary legal and technical expertise in the software field. This exchange and his feedback on my research were vital for the final version. Thank you so much, Wolfgang, for your exceptional support and commitment!
Prof. Dr. iur. Urs Gasser, LL.M., enabled me to spend two inspiring and instructive months as a visiting researcher at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society of Harvard University. It was in Cambridge where my interview study was finalized. Thank you so much, Urs and the representatives of the Berkman Klein Center, for enabling my stay and making it worthwhile. The Berkman Klein Center represents an accumulation of the most fascinating and enthused researchers and practitioners in the field.
A researcher cannot face the challenges of the research without the support of their closest ones thank you to my dear friends and family. My special thanks go out to MSc dipl. Inf. Felix Kaiser and Prof. Dr. phil. Stefan Leins, who spent hours helping to edit my work. I owe you my deepest gratitude. I am greatly indebted to Atty. Dr. iur. des. Angelika Murer, my dear friend, with whom I had untiring discussions about her, my and our common research.
Finally, the greatest thanks go to MA ETH HPK Robin Leins. His advice was prudent and challenging at the same time, his wonderful sketches were a presentation to the point. Thank you for keeping me focused and smiling, even through the cloudy days.
Zurich, September 2021.
3
Index
  1. Term of Protection
    1. Setting the Limits: Admissible and Inadmissible Third-Party
      Interventions
      1. Delimiting Second-Hand Works: Where Do they Offer a
        Contribution?
      2. Limiting Extensive Rights of Standard-Essential Patents and
        Fostering Incremental Improvements
4
List of Abbreviations
Only abbrevations which are used in this thesis are listed below.
ACMAssosiation for Computing MachineryAIPPIAssociation International pour la Protection de la Proprit IndustrielleArt.articleAustrian GMGAustrian Gebrauchsmustergesetz of April 1, 1994, BGBl. 1994/211 (status as of June 14, 2018)BAGBundesarbeitsgericht (German Federal Labour Court)BBBetriebs-Berater (periodical journal for law and economics)Beck RSBeck Rechtsprechung (collecton of jurisprudence)BGELeitentscheide des Bundesgerichts (published ruling of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court)BGerBundesgerichtsentscheid (unpublished ruling of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court)BGBlBundesgesetzblatt (German federal law gazette)BGHBundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice)BGHZEntscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Zivilsachen (collection of the decisions of the civil law court division of the German Federal High Court of Justice)BPatGBundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court)BPatGerBundespatentgericht (Swiss Federal Patent Court)BT-DrucksDrucksachen und Plenarprotokolle des Bundestages (documents of the German Parliament)c.considerationCDcompact discGCGeneral CourtCHFSwiss Franc(s)Cir.Circuit Court in the United StatesCJEUCourt of Juctice of the European UnionComputer Program Directive Council Directive (91/250/EEC) of 14 May 1991 on the legal protection of computer programs, implemented 1 January 1993, in force until 23 April 2009, substituted by the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2009/24/EC) of 23 April 2009Cong.U.S. CongressCopyright Directive Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2001/29/EC) of 22 May 2001, on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information societyDINDeutsches Institut fr Normierung (German Institute for Standardization)ECDREuropean Copyright and Design ReportsEC Copyright Term of Protection DirectiveCouncil Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993, harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rightsECJEuropean Court of JusticeE-Commerce DirectiveDirective of the European Parliament and of the Council (2000/31/EC) of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Marketed.editoreds.editorsEPCEuropean Patent Convention of 5 October 1973, revised 29 November 2000 (status as of June, 2016)EPOEuropean Patent OfficeEPO Tdecisions of the European Patent Office and its Board of AppealEUREuro(s)EWCACourt of Appeal of England and WalesEWHCHigh Court of England and Walesf.following pageFed. Cir.U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuitff.following pagesfn.footnoteFrench IP CodeFrench Intellectual Property Code of 1 July 1992, no 92597 (status as of August 1, 2019)German DesGGerman Design Act of 24 February 2014, BGBl. I S. 122 (status as of July 17, 2017)German GebrMG German Gebrauchsmustergesetz of 28 August 1986, BGBl. I 1455 (status as of July 17, 2017)German GeschGehGGerman Trade Secret Protection Act of 18 April 2019, BGBl. I S. 466German MarkenGGerman Markengesetz of 25 October 1994, BGBl. I S. 3082 (status as of December 11, 2018)German PatGGerman Patent Code of 5 May 1938, revised 16 December 1980, BGBl. 1981 I 1 (status as of October 8, 2017)German UrhGGerman Copyright Act of 9 September 1965, BGBl. I S. 1273 (status as of November 28, 2018)German UWGGerman Act against Unfair Competition of 3 July 2004, BGBl. I S. 3714 (status as of April 18, 2019)GRURGewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (periodical)HGerHandelsgericht (Commercial Court of cantons in Switzerland)ibid.ibidemICTinformation and communication technologyicwin conjunction withIECInternational Electrotechnical CommissionIEEEInstitute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersIPintellectual propertyISOInternational Organization for StandardizationLanham ActLanham Trademark Act of 5 July 1946, 60 Stat. 427, codified at 15 U.S.C. 1051 ff. LGLandgericht (lower regional courts in Germany)lit.literamio.million(s)MMRMultimedia und Recht (periodical)Nmarginal noteNJWNeue Juristische Wochenschrift (periodical)no.numberOECDOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentOGerObergericht (High Court of cantons in Switzerland)OLGOberlandsgericht (higher regional courts in Germany)openJURlegal database for German decisionsORSwiss Code of Obligations, Federal Act on the Amendment of the Swiss Civil Code of 30 March 1911, SR 220 (status as of April 1, 2017)para.paragraphParis Convention Revised Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 14 July 1967 (status as of March 20, 1983)PCTPatent Cooperation Treaty of 19 June 1970, revised 3 October 2001 (status as of June 28, 2019)PMMBlPatent-, Muster, und Markenblatt (publication of patent applications and granted patents in Switzerland before 1 July 2008)RBCRevised Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of 9 September 1886, revised in Paris on July 24, 1971 (status as of June 27, 2019)RPCReports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark CasesS.U.S. Senatesect.sectionSes.Session of the U.S. Congress or U.S. Senatesic!Swiss Law Review for Intellectual Property, Information and Competition LawSIWRSchweizerisches Immaterialgter- und Wettbewerbsrecht (book series)SRSystematische Rechtsammlung (classified compilation in Switzerland)Swiss CopASwiss Federal Act on Copyright and Related Rights of 9 October 1992, SR 231.1 (status as of 1 January, 2020)Swiss DesGSwiss Designs Act of 5 October 2001, SR 232.2 (status as of January 1, 2017) Swiss DesRSwiss Designs Regulation of 8 March 2001, SR 232.12 (status as of January 1, 2017)Swiss MSchGSwiss Trade Mark Protection Act of 28 August 1992, SR 232.11 (status as of April 1, 2019)Swiss PatGSwiss Patents Act of 25 June 1954, SR 232.14 (status as of January 1, 2012)Swiss UWGSwiss Act against Unfair Competition of 19 December 1986 SR 241.00 (status as of July 1, 2016)TRIPS Agreement Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights of 15 April 1994, Annex 1C to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (status as of January 23, 2017)UCCUniversal Copyright Convention of 24 July 1971 (status as of April 23, 2010)UFITAInstitut fr Urheber- und Medienrecht (series of publication), previously named Archiv fr Urheber-, Film-, Funk- und TheaterrechtUK IP ActUnited Kingdom Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 15 November 1988 (status as of October 11, 2018)UKSCUnited Kingdom Supreme CourtU.S. CodeCode of Laws of the United States of America of 30 June 1926 (status as of 2018)U.S. ConstitutionConstitution of the United States of 4 March 1789 (status as of April 18, 1999)USDU.S. Dollar(s)UTSAUniform Trade Secrets Act of 1979, amended 2 August 1985vol.volumeWCTWIPO Copyright Treaty of 20 December 1996 (status as of June 27, 2019)WIPOWorld Intellectual Property OrganizationWTOWorld Trade Organization
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law»

Look at similar books to Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ideation, Conceptualization, Realization: Discovering the Creative Scope in Software Engineering From the Perspective of Copyright and Patent Law and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.