Paul E. Spector - Summated rating scale construction: an introduction

Summated rating scale construction: an introduction — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Summated rating scale construction: an introduction" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...29

---

title	:	Summated Rating Scale Construction : An Introduction Sage University Papers Series. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences ; No. 07-082
author	:	Spector, Paul E.
publisher	:	Sage Publications, Inc.
isbn10 | asin	:	0803943415
print isbn13	:	9780803943414
ebook isbn13	:	9780585217154
language	:	English
subject	Scaling (Social sciences)
publication date	:	1992
lcc	:	H61.27.S66 1992eb
ddc	:	300/.72
subject	:	Scaling (Social sciences)

Summated Rating Scale Construction An Introduction

SAGE UNIVERSITY PAPERS Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series Editor: Michael S. Lewis-Beck, University of Iowa Editorial Consultants Richard A. Berk, Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles William D. Berry, Political Science, Florida State University Kenneth A. Bollen, Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Linda B. Bourque, Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles Jacques A. Hagenaars, Social Sciences, Tilburg University Sally Jackson, Communications, University of Arizona Richard M. Jaeger, Education, University of North Carolina, Greensboro Gary King, Department of Government, Harvard University Roger E. Kirk, Psychology, Baylor University Helena Chmura Kraemer, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Peter Marsden, Sociology, Harvard University Helmut Norpoth, Political Science, SUNY, Stony Brook Frank L. Schmidt, Management and Organization, University of Iowa Herbert Weisberg, Political Science, The Ohio State University Publisher Sara Miller McCune, Sage Publications, Inc. INSTRUCTIONS TO POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORS For guidelines on submission of a monograph proposal to this series, please write Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Editor Sage QASS Series Department of Political Science University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242

Page i Series/Number 07-082 Summated Rating Scale Construction An Introduction Paul E. Spector University of South Florida SAGE PUBLICATIONS The International Professional Publishers Newbury Park London New Delhi

Page ii Copyright 1992 by Sage Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information address: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2455 Teller Road Newbury Park, California 91320 E-mail: order@sagepub.com SAGE Publications Ltd. 6 Bonhill Street London EC2A 4PU United Kingdom SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. M-32 Market Greater Kailash I New Delhi 110 048 India Printed in the United States of America Spector, Paul E. Summated rating scale construction: an introduction / Paul E. Spector. p. cm.(Sage university papers series. Quantitative applications in the social sciences, no. 82) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8039-4341-5 1. Scaling (Social sciences) I. Title II. Series. H61.27.S66 1992 300'.72dc20 91-36161 99 00 01 02 11 10 9 8 Sage Production Editor: Astrid Virding When citing a University Paper, please use the proper form. Remember to cite the correct Sage University Paper series title and include the paper number. One of the following formats can be adapted (depending on the style manual used): (1) McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-064). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. OR (2) McCutcheon, A. L. 1987. Latent class analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-064. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Page iii Contents Series Editor's Introduction v 1. Introduction 1 Why Use Multiple-Item Scales? 4 What Makes a Good Scale? 6 Steps of Scale Construction 7 2. Theory of Summated Rating Scales 10 3. Defining the Construct 12 How to Define the Construct

Next page

1234567...29

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Summated rating scale construction: an introduction»

Look at similar books to Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

Ella Road

The Phlebotomist

Joe Charupakorn

Ultimate-Guitar Scale Decoder: Essential Scales and Modes for Guitar

Tenko Raykov

A Course in Item Response Theory and Modeling with Stata

Daniel Cash

Sustainability Rating Agencies vs Credit Rating Agencies: The Battle to Serve the Mainstream Investor

Felzenberg

The Leaders we deserved (and a few we didnt): rethinking the presidential rating game

Hal Leonard Corp

Teach Yourself to Play Guitar Scales

Blais Mark A.

Handbook of Clinical Rating Scales and Assessment in Psychiatry and Mental Health

Langville Amy N.

Whos number one?: the science of rating and ranking

Michael Rodriguez

The College Instructor’s Guide to Writing Test Items: Measuring Student Learning

Mark Bannerman

Modelling Scale Figures (Osprey Modelling №42)

Trevor G. Bond

Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition

Ron Cody

Test Scoring and Analysis Using SAS

Discussion, reviews of the book Summated rating scale construction: an introduction and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.