• Complain

Andrea DeCapua - Grammar for Teachers

Here you can read online Andrea DeCapua - Grammar for Teachers full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: Springer International Publishing, Cham, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Andrea DeCapua Grammar for Teachers
  • Book:
    Grammar for Teachers
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer International Publishing, Cham
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Grammar for Teachers: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Grammar for Teachers" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Andrea DeCapua: author's other books


Who wrote Grammar for Teachers? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Grammar for Teachers — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Grammar for Teachers" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
Andrea DeCapua Grammar for Teachers Springer Texts in Education 10.1007/978-3-319-33916-0_1
1. What Is Grammar?
Andrea DeCapua 1
(1)
New York University, New York, NY, USA
Andrea DeCapua
Email:
Abstract
This chapter is an overview of what grammar is. We examine what exactly rules of grammar consist of and consider these rules from two perspectives: prescriptive and descriptive. Throughout the chapter, you will exercise your knowledge as a native or highly proficient non-native speaker of Englishknowledge that you may only have had until now, implicitly.
Keywords
prescriptive grammar descriptive grammar
Introduction
When I think of grammar, I think of word usagewhich, of course, everyone butchers.
I despise grammar. I find the rules trite and boring.
Grammar (and its enforcers) need to loosen up and enjoy life more! Grammar makes my stomach churn.
These comments will strike a chord with many users of this textbook. The term grammar does not bring pleasant memories to the minds of many people. Instead, grammar frequently brings to mind tedious lessons with endless drills, repetition, and other generally mindless practice, focused on mostly obscure rules of how people are supposed to write and speak. For native speakers of any given language, grammar often represents to them the great mystery of language, known only to language specialists or those of older generations, the ones who really know what is right. Many feel that grammar is something that they were never taught and therefore dont know. Because bad grammar is often attributed to peoples misuse of language, there is often a sense of resentment or frustration with the notion of grammar.
1.1 Section 1: Grammarians and Grammar
The idea that grammar is a set of rules, often seen as arbitrary or unrealistic, is only one narrow view of grammar. Such a view is based on the belief that grammar:
  • must be explicitly taught;
  • is absolute and fixed, a target or goal that speakers need attain in order to be good speakers or writers of the language;
  • is inherently difficult and confusing, its mysteries apparent only to teachers, language mavens, or linguists.
People who follow this approach to grammar are called traditional or prescriptive grammarians.
Discovery Activity 1: Making Decisions on Grammaticality
Look at the sentences below.
  1. Based on your opinion, label each sentence as G for grammatical, N for ungrammatical, and ? for not sure or dont know.
  2. For those sentences you labeled as N , identify the element or elements that you think are ungrammatical and explain why you think they are ungrammatical. For those sentences you labeled as ? , discuss why you are unsure.
    1. (a)
      _____ She had less problems with the move to a new school than she thought she would.
    2. (b)
      _____ She lays in bed all day whenever she gets a migraine headache.
    3. (c)
      _____ My sister Alice, who is older than me, still lives at home.
    4. (d)
      _____ Everyone needs to buy their books before the first day of class.
Discussion: Discovery Activity 1
In all of these sentences, there is a difference between casual English and formal English. In formal English, particularly when written, there are rules that speakers are taught that must be followed in order for sentences to be considered correct.
Sentence a
Few, according to prescriptive grammarians, should be used only with nouns we can count, such as apples, pens, or days, while less should be used with nouns we cant count, such as math, water, or beauty. According to this rule, the sentence should be She had fewer problems with the move to the new school than she thought she would (see Chap. ).
Sentence b
Lie and lay are two different verbs. Lie is a verb that is not followed by an object, while lay is a verb that is followed by an object. Compare these two sentences:
Cats lie on beds.
lie = resting or sleeping
Cats lay mice on beds.
lay = put
Another way to differentiate these two similar verbs is to describe lay as an action verb and lie as a non-action verb. According to the rule, lie doesnt take an object but lay does, therefore, Sentence b in formal English needs to be rewritten as:
She lies in bed all day whenever she gets a migraine headache.
Adding to the confusion between lie and lay is the fact that the past tense form of lie is lay .
Yesterday she lay in bed all day long.
A tip in remember how to distinguish lay and lie is to ask yourself whether or not the verb put can be substituted as in: Cats put mice on beds but not * Cats put on beds.
Sentence c
There is a grammar rule that dictates I needs to be used here, not me, because than compares two nouns in subject position as in:
My sister Alice, who is older than I , still lives at home.
Nevertheless, for most speakers of American English, I after than sounds stilted or affected, especially in spoken English and in informal written contexts, such as e-mail or personal correspondence.
Sentence d
Here the discussion of which pronoun to refer back to everyone has long been a subject of controversy. Traditional grammarians for centuries have argued that the singular male possessive pronoun is the grammatically correct form because words such as anyone or anybody are singular, even though they refer to plural conceptualizations of people. The use of his after such pronouns as anyone or everybody is an artificial construct of traditional grammarians, derived from early English grammarians who wrote the first grammars based on logical Latin. Guided by the logic of Latin, they concluded that since one and body are singular and since a male pronoun would encompass reference to all persons, his was the logical or correct choice.
While such an argument may be true of Latin and other languages such as Spanish or German, there is no basis for this in English. In Spanish, all nouns are either masculine or feminine. In the case of Latin or German, all nouns are masculine, feminine, or neuter. The plural form, when reference is made to both sexes, has traditionally been the male plural form in these languages, although changes in modern languages include using both the male and female plural forms when referring to mixed groups.
English, in contrast, does not classify nouns according to gender, except in a few instances where they clearly refer to a specific sex, such as girl or father . Moreover, in plural form, English pronouns are all gender neutral ( we, our, ours, you, your, yours, they, their, theirs ).
Thus, although grammarians have insisted that speakers use his for centuries, the tendency has been to use the plural pronoun form their and to avoid any reference to gender.
In the last several decades, it has become generally unacceptable in American English to use the singular male pronoun after such words as each, everyone, and somebody . It has become more and more acceptable, even in formal writing, to use the plural they. Many newspapers, such as the Washington Post, now accept they after indefinite pronouns; Facebook allows people to choose they as their preferred pronoun; and in 2015, the American Dialect Society chose they as the gender-neutral singular pronoun.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Grammar for Teachers»

Look at similar books to Grammar for Teachers. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Grammar for Teachers»

Discussion, reviews of the book Grammar for Teachers and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.