• Complain

David Yun Dai - Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research

Here you can read online David Yun Dai - Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Taylor and Francis, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

David Yun Dai Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research
  • Book:
    Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Taylor and Francis
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book highlights how to conduct research in gifted education when researchers have to choose from myriad theoretical ideas, hypotheses, claims, practical models, and strategies. It shows researchers how to build clarity, rigor, and relevance into a research agenda that combats fragmentation and contributes to enhanced theoretical and practical endeavors in the field. Specifically, Paradigms of Gifted Education advocates a paradigmatic approach to conducting research in gifted education and shows how it can be done every step of the way by specifying the essential questions of What?, Why?, Who?, and How? in a coherent manner, and by selecting methods that are appropriate for the question asked and the phase of the research efforts. To facilitate the development of a research agenda, the book identifies three major paradigms of gifted education and 20 essential research questions that would help move the field forward.

David Yun Dai: author's other books


Who wrote Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

References

Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ackerman, C. M. (2009). The essential elements of Dabrowskis theory of positive disintegration and how they are connected. Roeper Review, 31, 8195.

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288318.

Ackerman, P. L. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38, 8593.

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219245.

Adelson, J. L., & Carpenter, B. D. (2011). Grouping for achievement gains: For whom does achievement grouping increase kindergarten reading growth? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 265278. doi:10.1177/0016986211417306

Adelson, J. L., McCoach, D. B., & Gavin, M. K. (2012). Examining the effects of gifted programming in mathematics and reading using the ECLS-K. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 2539. doi:10.1177/0016986211431487

Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Allport, G. W. (1937). Patterns and growth in personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Al-Hroub, A. (2011). Developing assessment profiles for mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties at three schools in Cambridgeshire, England. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 744. doi:10.1177/016235321003400102

Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159186.

Ambrose, D. (2003). Barriers to aspiration development and self-fulfillment: Interdisciplinary insights for talent discovery. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 282294.

Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159186.

Ambrose, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2010). Unified, insular, firmly policed, or fractured, porous, contested, gifted education? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 453478.

American Association on Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Angoff, W. H. (1988). The nature-nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. American Psychologist, 43, 713720.

Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103119.

Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Whiteman, C. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 102115. doi:10.1177/0016986209355974

Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2008). Inquiry in education: The conceptual foundations for research as a curricular imperative. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Baker, E. L. (2007). The end(s) of testing. Educational Researcher, 36, 309317.

Bamberger, J. (1986). Cognitive issues in the development of musically gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 388413). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193224.

Beltman, S., & Volet, S. (2007). Exploring the complex and dynamic nature of sustained motivation. European Psychologist, 12, 314323.

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, R. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on Americas public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bernal, E. M. (2003). To no longer educate the gifted: Programming for gifted students beyond the era of inclusionism. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 183191. doi:10.1177/001698620304700302

Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (1988). Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 248253. doi:10.1177/001698628803200202

Betts, G. T., & Neihart, M. (2004). Profiles of the gifted and talented. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Definitions and conceptions of giftedness (pp. 97106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Beutler, L. E., & Rosner, R. (1995). Introduction to psychological assessment. In L. E. Beutler & R. Rosner (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 124). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Blackburn, S. (2008). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bleske-Rechek, A., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. (2004). Meeting the educational needs of special populations: Advanced Placements role in developing exceptional human capital. Psychological Science, 15, 217224.

Block, J. (2002). Personality as an affect-processing system: Toward an integrative system. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149167.

Borkowski, J. G., & Peck, V. A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Borland, J. H. (1997). Evaluating gifted programs. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 253266). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105124). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 119). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Borland, J. H. (2008). Identification. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 261280). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Borland, J. H. (2012). A landmark monograph in gifted education, and why I disagree with its major conclusion. The Creativity Post. Retrieved from http://www.creativitypost.com/education/a_landmark_monograph_in_gifted_education_and_why_i_disagree_with_its_major

Borland, J. H., Horton, D., Subotnik, R. F., Shiang-Jiun, C., Miran, C., Freeman, C., & Yu, J. (2002). Ability-grouping and acceleration of gifted students: Articles from the

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research»

Look at similar books to Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research»

Discussion, reviews of the book Paradigms of Gifted Education: A Guide for Theory-Based, Practice-Focused Research and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.