• Complain

Robert W. Batterman - The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence

Here you can read online Robert W. Batterman - The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2001, publisher: Oxford University Press, USA, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Robert W. Batterman The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence
  • Book:
    The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press, USA
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2001
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Robert Batterman examines a form of scientific reasoning called asymptotic reasoning, arguing that it has important consequences for our understanding of the scientific process as a whole. He maintains that asymptotic reasoning is essential for explaining what physicists call universal behavior. With clarity and rigor, he simplifies complex questions about universal behavior, demonstrating a profound understanding of the underlying structures that ground them. This book introduces a valuable new method that is certain to fill explanatory gaps across disciplines.

Robert W. Batterman: author's other books


Who wrote The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Batterman Robert W Associate Professor of Philosophy Ohio State University - photo 1
Batterman, Robert W. Associate Professor of Philosophy, Ohio State University
The Devil in the Details
Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence
Print ISBN 0195146476, 2001
doi:10.1093/0195146476.001.0001
Abstract: This book focuses on a form of reasoning in science that I call "asymptotic reasoning." At base, this type of reasoning involves methods that eliminate details and, in some sense, precision. Asymptotic reasoning has received systematic treatment in physics and applied mathematics, but virtually no attention has been paid to it by philosophers of science. I argue that once one understands the role played by asymptotic reasoning in explanatory arguments of scientists, our philosophical conceptions of explanation, reduction, and emergence require significant modification.
Keywords: asymptotics,Batterman,emergence,explanation,limits,multiple realizability,philosophy of science,reduction,renormalization group,scientific understanding,universality
The Devil in the Details
end p.i
Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science

The Book of Evidence
Peter Achinstein
Science, Truth, and Democracy
Philip Kitcher
The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning
in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence
Robert W. Batterman
end p.ii
The Devil in the Details
Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence
Picture 2
2002
end p.iii
Picture 3

198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide in
Oxford New York
Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai
Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi
So Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto
Copyright 2002 by Oxford University Press, Inc.
Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate
reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Batterman, Robert W.
The devil in the details: asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction,
and emergence/Robert W. Batterman
p. cm.
ISBN 0-19-514647-6
1. Reasoning. 2. Science Philosophy.
3. Science Methodology. 1. Title.
Q175.32.R45 B37 2002
153.4'3-dc21 2001047453
end p.iv
For Carolyn
end p.v
end p.vi
Acknowledgments
This book is the result of many years of trying to understand certain aspects of the relations that obtain between distinct physical theories. Much of my research has been guided by the clear and fascinating work of Professor Sir Michael Berry. As is clear to anyone who reads this book, my intellectual debt to Professor Berry is very great indeed.
I also owe much to my teacher Lawrence Sklar, who taught me, among many other things, how to approach philosophical issues in the foundations of physical theory. My aim, unfortunately only asymptotically realized, has been to apply this knowledge to gain insight into some of these philosophical debates.
Mark Wilson, too, has been a great help and a source of encouragement. I want to especially thank him for many discussions that have helped me sharpen my presentation of the issues considered in the book.
Many people have aided me in my research. I wish to thank William Wimsatt for many discussions about intertheoretic reduction. Roger Jones has helped me get clear about many of the issues discussed in this book. William Taschek and Diana Raffman listened to my ramblings about multiple realizability and universality for so long that it is difficult to express sufficiently my gratitude for their tremendous help and patience. Justin D'Arms was of great help in getting clear about many aspects of the arguments that appear in this book. Sylvia Berryman has been a superb colleague. She read and provided valuable comments on virtually every chapter of the book. I would also like to thank Daniel Farrell, Dion Scott-Kakures, Joseph Mendola, George Pappas, and Alex Rueger for helpful comments and discussions, both substantive and strategic, about the writing of this book.
Several anonymous referees provided valuable criticism and commentary. I hope that I have been able to address at least some of their worries.
I would also like to acknowledge the generous support of the National Science Foundation for several grants that allowed me to pursue the research for this book.
Some of the material in this book has been taken from previously published papers. I wish to acknowledge Blackwell Publishers for permission to use material from "Explanatory Instability," Nous, 36, pp. 325- 348, (1992). Similar thanks to Kluwer Academic Publishers for permission to use material from "Theories Between Theories...," Synthese, 103, pp. 171- 201, (1995) and to Oxford University Press for permission to use of material from "Multiple Realizability and Universality," British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, pp. 115- 145, (2000).
Finally, I would like to thank Carolyn for once glancing accidentally at a page of this book, and for giving me the title. I also want to thank Monty for taking me for walks to clear my head.
end p.vii
end p.viii
Contents
Introduction
Asymptotic Reasoning
2.1
The Euler Strut
2.2
Universality
2.3
Intertheoretic Relations
2.4
Emergence
2.5
Conclusion
Philosophical Theories of Explanation
3.1
Different Why-Questions
3.2
Hempelian Explanation and Its Successors
3.3
Conclusion
Asymptotic Explanation
4.1
The Renormalization Group (RG)
4.2
The General Strategy
4.3
"Intermediate Asymptotics"
4.4
Conclusion: The Role of Stability
Philosophical Models of Reduction
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence»

Look at similar books to The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.