• Complain

Wesley Greene - Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners

Here you can read online Wesley Greene - Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Rodale Books, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Rodale Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

From the nations foremost historical preservation site comes a guide to traditionaland
still relevantmethods and advice for planting and tending a productive vegetable garden
In a colonial-style garden, the broccoli is purple and turkey cucumbers grow to three feet long; oiled
paper predates plastic for sheltering spring plants; and fermenting manure warms the seedlings. Finding
inspiration and value in 18th-century plants, tools, and techniques, the gardeners at Colonial Williamsburg have discovered that these traditional vegetable-growing methods are perfectly at home in todays modern organic gardens. After all, in the 18th century, organic gardening was the only type of gardening and local produce the only produce available.
Author Wesley Greene founded the Colonial Garden in Colonial Williamsburgs Historic Area in 1996. He and his colleagues have painstakingly researched the ways the colonists planted and tended their vegetable and herb beds, most of which are more relevant than ever. Along with historical commentary and complete growing instructions for 50 delicious vegetables, including colonial varieties still available today, gardeners and folklorists will find weather-watching guidelines, planting techniques, and seedsaving advice for legumes, brassicas, alliums, root crops, nightshades, melons, squash, greens, and other curious and tender produce.

Wesley Greene: author's other books


Who wrote Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

To Denise and Don soul mate and garden mate Contents - photo 1

To Denise and Don,

soul mate and garden mate

Contents Introduction W hen the first colonists arrived in Virginia in - photo 2

Contents Introduction W hen the first colonists arrived in Virginia in - photo 3

Contents

Picture 4

Introduction

W hen the first colonists arrived in Virginia in the spring of 1607, they were greeted by a vast wilderness populated by the many tribes of the Powhatan Nation. It was a wilderness for which the colonists were woefully unprepared. When Captain Christopher Newport set sail for the return trip to England on June 22, 1607, he left behind 104 colonists at the new settlement of Jamestown. Within a month, 21 were dead. By the time the first supply ship returned in January 1608, only 38 were still alive.

The Jamestown colonists relied on the native population to supplement their food supply. In 1609, Chief Powhatan, in an attempt to starve the colonists out, blockaded the settlement and withheld all provisions. His strategy almost worked. Of the nearly 500 colonists living at Jamestown in the fall of 1609, only 60 remained by the spring of 1610. This period is remembered as the starving time. Everyone felt the sharpe pricke of hunger, as the colonys governor wrote.

Nevertheless, the English held on and learned to provide for themselves. In July 1610, the newly resupplied colony submitted this surprisingly optimistic report to the London Company of Virginia: We have made triall of our owne English seedes, kitchen hearbes, and rootes, and find them no sooner putt into the ground then to prosper as speedily and after the same quallitie as in England. For the rest of the century, most accounts attested to the fertility of the soil and the luxuriance of the produce, though Virginians were apparently slow to take advantage of this good fortune. Robert Beverley recorded in The History and Present State of Virginia (1705): A Garden is no where sooner made than there. And yet they hant many Gardens in the Country, fit to bear that name.

Beverley may have been too harsh. Virginia in the 17th century was still a wilderness with most households practicing subsistence farming. Corn was, by far, the most important crop, followed by field peas and beans. Livestock thrived, and hogs ran wild through the woods. A vegetable garden provided luxuries rather than staples, and though its produce was a much appreciated diversion from a monotonous diet of meat and grain, it was not always dependable.

In the 18th century, towns such as Williamsburg (founded in 1699) were populated by a professional class of merchants, tradesmen, lawyers, doctors, and clerks with the wealth and leisure to pursue vegetable gardening. For instruction, they turned to the English garden works of Philip Miller, Richard Bradley, John Abercrombie, and others. The Virginian climate was very different from the English climate, so the garden information found in these works had to be adapted to suit local conditions.

The first American garden book, A Treatise on Gardening, was written in Williamsburg by John Randolph, the last royal attorney general for the colony of Virginia. There are no copies of his original work, and later editions are attributed only to a native of this State. We have deduced that Randolph was the author based on citations from several contemporary sources, one being Thomas Jeffersons reference to the Treatise as the work of John Randolph.

It is not known exactly when the Treatise was written Randolph was a loyalist - photo 5

It is not known exactly when the Treatise was written. Randolph was a loyalist and returned to England in 1775, so he must have written his treatise before then. Most evidence points to the middle years of the 1760s. The only known 18th-century copy of this little book is a 1793 edition published in Richmond and kept at the Wyndham Robertson Library at Hollins University in Roanoke, Virginia.

Randolph closely followed the advice found in Philip Millers The Gardeners Dictionary, published in England. A comparison of the two works reveals Randolph was working from either the 1752 folio or the 1754 abridgement of The Gardeners Dictionary. Randolphs Treatise was not, however, merely a copy of Millers more famous work. Randolph was clearly writing from his own experience in the New World. Most notably, he changed the planting dates to suit the Virginia climate. He also observed, for example, that the multiple spring sowings of spinach recommended for England resulted, in Virginia, in plants bolting and going to seed.

Like Randolph, we use 18th-century English garden works as guides to keeping our Colonial Garden and Nursery on the Duke of Gloucester Street in Colonial Williamsburgs historic area. Like Randolph, we have adapted this information to suit the Virginia climate; we also have altered his advice to suit the 21st-century climate. It was much colder in 1765 Virginia than it is here today.

Most of the tools used in our garden are made in the shops and yards of our historic tradespeople. The blacksmith makes our metal tools, the coopers make the buckets, and our watering cans are made by one of our multitalented gunsmiths. The wheelwrights make our wheelbarrows, the joiners make our frames, and the basketmakers weave our baskets. Bricks come from our wood-fired kiln, and the paper for our frames is provided by our printers. Glass and glass bells come from abroad, as they would have in the 18th century. The modern gardener would recognize most of our hand tools, and many gardening tasks have spanned the centuries relatively unchanged. Often the difference is in the materials rather than the method. For example, we provide bottom heat to our seedbed by using fermenting manure, while the modern gardener uses electric mats. We cover our hoops with oiled paper, while the modern gardener uses plastic. The materials may be different, but the method and results are the same.

For some tasks, technology has made a dramatic difference in the way we garden. The ability or inability to water the garden has been the single most important limiting factor to gardening throughout history, particularly in southern climates. Many of mans earliest inventions (the Assyrian shaduf, the Roman aqueduct, the Greek Archimedes screw) were devices for moving water. In 18th-century Williamsburg, water had to be hauled from a well.

We have found, in our small -acre garden, that with hauling water from the well, filling up the cistern, and using watering cans, the two of us can move 4,000 pounds (about 200 gallons) a day and still not keep up with our needs when summer stays dry. In 18th-century Williamsburg, the garden was the responsibility of the lady of the house, and she was at the mercy of the weather. Only families wealthy enough to afford slave labor to move the water could reliably keep a summer garden.

Even then, it was an overwhelmingly difficult task. John Custis, who kept a 4-acre garden on the edge of town, lamented in a 1738 letter to Peter Collinson: I kept 3 strong Nigros continually filling large tubs of water and put them in the sun and waterd plentifully every night, made shades and arbors all over the garden allmost; but abundance of things perishd; notwithstanding all the care and trouble, so that my garden is very much impaired.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners»

Look at similar books to Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners»

Discussion, reviews of the book Vegetable Gardening the Colonial Williamsburg Way: 18th-Century Methods for Todays Organic Gardeners and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.