• Complain

Alexander Unzicker - Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility

Here you can read online Alexander Unzicker - Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: St. Martin’s Press, genre: Children. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Alexander Unzicker Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility
  • Book:
    Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    St. Martin’s Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The recently celebrated discovery of the Higgs boson has captivated the publics imagination with the promise that it can explain the origins of everything in the universe. Its no wonder that the media refers to it grandly as the God particle. Yet behind closed doors, physicists are admitting that there is much more to this story, and even years of gunning the Large Hadron Collider and herculean number crunching may still not lead to a deep understanding of the laws of nature. In this fascinating and eye-opening account, theoretical physicist Alexander Unzicker and science writer Sheilla Jones offer a polemic. They question whether the large-scale, multinational enterprises actually lead us to the promised land of understanding the universe. The two scientists take us on a tour of contemporary physics and show how a series of highly publicized theories met a dead end. Unzicker and Jones systematically unpack the recent hot theories such as parallel universes, string theory, and inflationary cosmology, and provide an accessible explanation of each. They argue that physics has abandoned its evidence-based roots and shifted to untestable mathematical theories, and they issue a clarion call for the science to return to its experimental foundation.

Alexander Unzicker: author's other books


Who wrote Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

BANKRUPTING PHYSICS

BANKRUPTING PHYSICS

HOW TODAYS TOP SCIENTISTS ARE GAMBLING AWAY THEIR CREDIBILITY

ALEXANDER UNZICKER

AND

SHEILLA JONES

Picture 1

The author and publisher have provided this e-book to you for your personal use only. You may not make this e-book publicly available in any way. Copyright infringement is against the law. If you believe the copy of this e-book you are reading infringes on the authors copyright, please notify the publisher at: us.macmillanusa.com/piracy.

CONTENTS

PROLOGUE

RELAXING, EXCITING, AND OVERSTRUNG PHYSICS

There is nothing more relaxing than physics. However distressing everyday problems may appear to us, our human endeavors appear trivial and inconsequential under the universes vast and starry sky. Or, alternatively, imagine the smallness of the elementary building blocks that comprise Nature. These thoughts are a refuge for the harried mind.

But it is equally true that there is hardly anything more exciting than physics. Physics shows us the microscopic world with incredible tools, and the entire universe has opened up before our eyes with the kind of detail unknown to previous generations. Never before have we been better prepared to discover the fundamental laws of Nature.

Yet, and regrettably, there is also much that is ludicrous being sold under the name of physics, and this book will deal extensively with this issue. This is not a polemic against science. Far from it. Rather, it is a recognition that while much of our civilization is based on physics, it is human curiosity and aspiration that drives science. And inevitably, there is also human wishful thinking and human failure.

Applied physics has been a terrific success to date, and the fundamental findings of theoretical physics in the early twentieth century were among the greatest accomplishments of humankind. But that was then. Today, the major part of theoretical physics has instead gotten lost in bizarre constructs that are completely disconnected from reality, in a mockery of the methods that grounded the success of physics for 400 years.

Fortunately, an increasing number of people in the scientific community and in the public are becoming aware that bold ideas such as string theory, multiverses, chaotic inflation, and a holographic principle have little to do with real physics. Unfortunately, before these fantasies took over, physics was already ailing.

A particularly worrying symptom of the current state of affairs in physics is the so-called discovery of the Higgs boson at CERN. The media-hyped announcement in 2012 has been followed up by a series of announcements, each installment making the case that the big sensation is increasingly more likely. But what was actually discovered were a number of unexplained signals obtained by extensive filtering methods, raising many questions for everyone who takes a sober perspective. Nobody can claim to oversee the analysis of the massive pile of data produced by CERNs collider experiments.

Nevertheless, these signals are pushed to serve as evidence for the long-theorized Higgs boson supporting the standard model of particle physics, although this standard model is not even a well-defined theory. Such an interpretation speaks more of desperation to validate the past six decades of research and to shore up a model that is wobbling precariously under the weight of all the bits and pieces glued onto it to make it work.

I can hear the protests of physicists who conveyed the message in good faith. But they had little choice. The CERN particle search is the most expensive experiment ever conducted, and the thousands of scientists doing high-energy research there had to celebrate any outcome as a breakthrough, if only to justify the billions of dollars of public money being spent.

In economics, we have seen expert analysts parroting one anothers euphoric statements when the underlying construction, based entirely on confidence, was about to crash. A worrying amount of knowledge in physics is based on such confidence in expert opinions.

Economics can produce bubbles, and so can science. It appears to be a universal mechanism of human aspiration that, while following the seemingly obvious, methods can gradually slip into absurdity, leaving behind unresolved problems that escape the attention of busy researchers. We need to take a step back from the scientific convictions of our generation and scrutinize the complicated models that might well be rather mundane constructions than true laws of Nature.

This book is not going to be the ally of religion, intelligent design garbage, or other esoteric hokum. It is true science that we need, and it is the erosion of its methods that has led to the crisis of physics we observe today. Keep this diagnosis in mind while you are reading the book.

Whatever my criticisms of science, I still have more esteem for scientists self-indulgent fantasies about imaginary multiverses than for those who, in pursuit of power, wealth, and military vengeance at the expense of the environment and the well-being of humankind, are about to destroy our real world and thus put into danger the whole enterprise of Homo sapiens on this planet. More than ever, the world needs the competence of physicists. And this is another reason why physics must be careful not to gamble away its intellectual authority while playing with fantasies more suited to the science fiction industry. There are lots of things to do to understand our world theoretically, and to conserve our world practically.

I hope that the fascination for the universe and its many intriguing puzzles continuously accompanies you on the pages that follow. Doing scientific research is a privilege of the era we are living in. It is a big responsibility. That is why I wrote this book.

While completing my German manuscript, I discovered Sheilla Joness The Quantum Ten, an excellent history of quantum mechanics. What really impressed me was how persuasively she explained the way modern theoretical physics has gone astray since the late 1920s. I am happy that we could write this book with such a common view, and I am grateful that her investigative mind as a journalist and her profound knowledge about history contributed to this restructured English edition.

BANKRUPTING PHYSICS

Copyright Alexander Unzicker and Sheilla Jones, 2013.

Translation from the German language edition: Vom Urknall zum Durchknall by A. Unzicker. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010. Springer-Verlag is part of Springer Science+Business Media.

All rights reserved.

For information, address St. Martins Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010.

First published in 2013 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN in the United States a division of St. Martins Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.

ISBN 9781137278234

Our eBooks may be purchased in bulk for promotional, educational, or business use. Please contact the Macmillan Corporate and Premium Sales Department at 1-800-221-7945, ext. 5442, or by e-mail at .

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Unzicker, Alexander.

Bankrupting physics : how todays top scientists are gambling away their credibility / Alexander Unzicker and Sheilla Jones.

pages cm

ISBN 9781137278234 (hardback)

1. PhysicsPhilosophy. 2. PhysicsExperiments. 3. PhysicsMathematical models. I. Jones, Sheilla. II. Title.

QC6.U59 2013

530dc23 2013004524

A catalogue record of the book is available from the British Library.

Design by Newgen Imaging Systems, Ltd., Chennai, India

First edition: July 2013

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility»

Look at similar books to Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility»

Discussion, reviews of the book Bankrupting Physics: How Today’s Top Scientists are Gambling Away Their Credibility and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.