THE EDUCATION OF MRS. BEMIS
The case of dueling pistols owned by Hamiltons good Federalist friend New York senator Rufus King. Similar to the Robert Wogdon flintlock pistols used in the fatal duel between Hamilton and Burr, these were made by H.W. Mortimer. They were never fired but demonstrate that such equipment was de rigueur for a gentleman of the political class and indicate the elaborate machinery involved in defending ones honor.
An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC
375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 10014
This book is an original publication of Penguin Random House LLC.
Copyright 2015 by John Sedgwick.
Penguin supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin to continue to publish books for every reader.
BERKLEY and the B design are registered trademarks of Penguin Random House LLC.
For more information, visit penguin.com.
eBook ISBN: 978-0-698-19390-1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Sedgwick, John, 1954
War of two : Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, and the duel that stunned the nation / John Sedgwick.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-59240-852-8 (hardcover)
1. Burr-Hamilton Duel, Weehawken, N.J., 1804. 2. Hamilton, Alexander, 17571804. 3. Burr, Aaron, 17561836. 4. United StatesPolitics and government18011809. I. Title.
E302.6.H2S27 2015
973.4'60922dc23
2015014275
FIRST EDITION: October 2015
Cover photograph of Alexander Hamilton DEA PICTURE LIBRARY / Getty Images.
Cover design by Stephen Brayda.
Photo credits: .
The excerpt Only we two are one is a portion of line from Re-statement of Romance, a poem by Wallace Stevens, from Wallace Stevens Selected Poems, edited by John N. Serio, Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House, Inc., 2009; reprinted from Ideas of Order by Wallace Stevens, copyright 1936 by Wallace Stevens, renewed 1964 by Holly Stevens.
Most Berkley Books are available at special quantity discounts for bulk purchases for sales promotions, premiums, fund-raising, or educational use. Special books, or book excerpts, can also be created to fit specific needs. For details, write: specialmarkets@penguinrandomhouse.com.
Version_1
F OR R ANA
Only we two are one
Wallace Stevens
The powers of Hyde seemed to have grown with the sickliness of Jekyll. And certainly the hate that now divided them was equal on each side. With Jekyll, it was a thing of vital instinct. He had now seen the full deformity of that creature that shared with him some of the phenomena of consciousness, and was co-heir with him to death: and beyond these links of community, which in themselves made the most poignant part of his distress, he thought of Hyde, for all his energy of life, as of something not only hellish but inorganic.
R OBERT L OUIS S TEVENSON ,
The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
CONTENTS
AUTHORS NOTE
O NE FALL AFTERNOON several years ago, I was in the reading room of the Massachusetts Historical Society, a splendid brick bastion in Bostons leafy Fenway neighborhood. I was prowling through the societys extensive collection of Sedgwick family papers for a book I was writing about my familys history when the head librarian, Peter Drummey, came up and tapped me on the shoulder and said he had something to show me.
Weve got this one on display up front, he whispered. Come, you should see it. He led me through a series of rooms to an exhibition space showing the societys prized holdings in long glass cases. Peter stopped beside one of them and pointed toward a wrinkled letter, yellowed with age, its once-black ink long since faded to brown, that was propped up on glass. There. Take a look.
I bent over the case. New York, July 10, 1804, I read out.
My Dear Sir
I have received two letters from you since we last saw each otherthat of the latest date being the 24 of May. I have had in hand for some time a long letter to you, explaining my view of the course and tendency of our Politics, and my intentions as to my own future conduct. But my plan embraced so large a range that owing to much avocation, some indifferent health, and a growing distaste for Politics, the letter is still considerably short of being finishedI write this now to satisfy you, that want of regard for you has not been the cause of my silence
Wait, this isnt? I asked.
Peter nodded. YesAlexander Hamiltons last letter. Written the night before he was shot. By the sitting vice president Aaron Burr, he need hardly have added, in the famous duel at Weehawken, New Jersey, in 1804, an event that Henry Adams called the most dramatic moment in the politics of the early Republic.
And look, its to one of yours. He beamed. His good friend and legislative ally Theodore Sedgwick. Of coursethe name was scrawled hastily across the bottom.
Id known about the letter, but Id never seen it. Theodore was my great-great-great-grandfather. A career politician, hed helped push Hamiltons economic agenda through the House when he was a representative from Massachusetts, and ultimately rose to become Speaker of the House for the fateful election of 1800 that wrested control away from his Federalist Party and turned it over to Thomas Jefferson and the Republican Jacobins, as he thought of them, alluding to the bloodthirsty radicals of the French Revolution. Much to Hamiltons distress, Theodore had tried fruitlessly to steer the election to Burr, a friend from the Berkshires. Still, Theodore had been one of the only politicians whod remained a trusted friend of both men, which was why Hamilton was writing him then.
We will return to the letter later, in its time. Taken out of context, it may seem tangential and, unusually for Hamilton, wildly overblown. It is likely to defy expectations as to why Hamilton crossed the Hudson at daybreak and faced his doom. In a few choice sentences, Hamilton offered a better explanation about his part in the duel, and a better prediction of what would come from it, than he did anywhere else. Theodore Sedgwick never responded, since by then there was no one to respond to.
When earlier members of the family encountered the letter, they could see its value to history, for several added urgent notations on the back before they passed the letter down to the next generation. All conveyed the same message: