JOHN CHEEVER
The Wapshot
Scandal
WITH A FOREWORD BY
Dave Eggers
Contents
This eBook is copyright material and must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licensed or publicly performed or used in any way except as specifically permitted in writing by the publishers, as allowed under the terms and conditions under which it was purchased or as strictly permitted by applicable copyright law. Any unauthorised distribution or use of this text may be a direct infringement of the authors and publishers rights and those responsible may be liable in law accordingly.
Version 1.0
Epub ISBN 9781407072777
www.randomhouse.co.uk
Published by Vintage 1998
2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3 1
Copyright John Cheever 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964
Foreword copyright Dave Eggers 2003
John Cheever has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work
Six parts of this book appeared in The New Yorker and one in Esquire and the author is grateful to the editors for their permission to reprint
This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publishers prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition, including this condition, being imposed on the subsequent purchaser
First published in Great Britain by Harper in 1964 First published by Vintage in 1998
Vintage
Random House, 20 Vauxhall Bridge Road,
London SW1V 2SA
www.vintage-classics.info
Addresses for companies within The Random House Group Limited can be found at: www.randomhouse.co.uk/offices.htm
The Random House Group Limited Reg. No. 954009
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 9780099275282
To W.M.
THE WAPSHOT SCANDAL
John Cheever was born in Quincy, Massachusetts, in 1912, and went to school at Thayer Academy in South Braintree. He is the author of seven collections of stories and five novels. His first novel, The Wapshot Chronicle , won the 1958 National Book Award. In 1965 he received the Howells Medal for Fiction from the National Academy of Arts and Letters and in 1978 he won the National Book Critics Circle Award and the Pulitzer Prize. Shortly before his death in 1982 he was awarded the National Medal for Literature.
ALSO BY JOHN CHEEVER
Novels
The Wapshot Chronicle
Falconer
Bullet Park
Oh What a Paradise It Seems
Short Stories
The Way Some People Live
The Enormous Radio
The Housebreaker of Shady Hill
Some People, Places and Things
That Will Not Appear in My Next Novel
The Brigadier and the Golf Widow
The World of Apples
The Stories of John Cheever
Journals
The Journals
Letters
The Letters of John Cheever (edited by Benjamin Cheever)
All the characters in this work are fictional, as is much of the science.
FOREWORD
A Foreword by a non-Cheever-scholar and infrequent reader of forewords:
I dont know how certain books become canonical and others dont. I know nothing about how these things work, what committees are formed, consulted, and what powers they wield, but I picture the process like a Pachinko. The book, playing the part of the silver lead ball stay with me here is sent through the top of the machine the literary-cultural-academic machine and it tinkles back and forth, subjected to popular and critical reaction, to revisionist theory, to changes in taste over a period of time, and eventually, if all goes well, it scores some points and stays in play. (I guess maybe I should have used a pinball metaphor. Your thoughts? Send them to 826 Valencia Street, San Francisco, CA 94110. Thank you in advance.)
For whatever reason, Cheevers stories, which are not superior to this novel and its predecessor, are remembered better than the Wapshots , but there is no clear way to explain why. Did the first Wapshot book not win the National Book Award? It did win that. Are these novels lacking in scope? Not a bit. Are they not representative of the human condition at a juncture in time? They are. Are they convincing? They are. Are they beautiful? They are so filled with love that its hard to believe that a man wrote these sentences, and not some kind of freakish winged book-writing angel-beast or something. And finally: Are these just short stories stretched to novel length? Not at all.
The Wapshot Scandal is very much a fully realized novel, and not only is it masterfully paced and exquisitely written but its also adherent to the best aspect of the novel form: its willingness to be big, messy, sprawling, and meandering. Though Cheever is never out of control his command of his always perfect sentences and paragraphs is uninterrupted he does make some very loose decisions. Scandal is not tidy, and few if any of the characters come out, in the end, changed in any fundamental way. One dies, and one begins drinking heavily, but otherwise there are no great and articulated epiphanies. Best of all, a number of secondary characters are introduced and developed and then never find their way back into the narrative. The book does not end in a way that would be satisfying to readers expecting closure, and this makes the book not craft but art.
That must be what some of us fear with Cheever, or with what we assume about Cheever: that his work will be exquisite or carefully crafted. (And I do believe I used the word exquisite just a short while ago. And for that Im sorry.) That its of small scope but masterful in style. Something like that like a toy boat on a small man-made pond. But I think what this book, as one example, demonstrates, is that Cheever is the blessedly craziest and most passionate kind of artist. This book is a breathless burst of a thing, no matter how long it took to write (and I have no idea how long that was, though Cheevers Wapshot Chronicle is thought to have taken twenty years). However long it took and thats pretty much irrelevant, always Scandal is one of the most fluid and riveting things written in the last fifty years, and it, yes, it showcases Cheevers ridiculously visceral feeling for the human animal.
The best books are hits of nitrous you suck them in, they give you a warm wa-wa feeling for awhile, and when youre done, you go looking for more. (That is, if youre that sort of person, a parking-lot person, eating a grilled cheese with one hand and looking for a miracle with the other. And I am not that person, except one time, in Durham, North Carolina, c. 1991.) The best books, I want to say, relight the world; they take the flaccid balloon of time, place, and character and breathe into it until the thing is about to pop. And this much is true: Cheever has amazing lungs.
Heres an example. It takes place when Melissa, the somewhat disillusioned but lusty wife of Moses Wapshot, is at the florist and overhears another customer ordering flowers for a dead relative:
I guess Im the closest she has left, he said confusedly, and Melissa, waiting for her roses, felt a premonition of death. She must die she must be the subject of some such discussion in a flower shop, and close her eyes forever on a world that distracted her with its beauty. The image, hackneyed and poignant, that to her was of life as a diversion, a festival from which she was summoned by the secret police of extinction, when the dancing and the music were at their best. I do not want to leave, she thought. I do not ever want to leave.
This is of course how we feel while reading The Wapshot Scandal its so good in here we dont want to leave, even though the lives of these people are not, at all, intrinsically interesting. Maybe only Cheever can acknowledge the mundanity of suburban existence, keep his characters firmly rooted in the soil of that world, and yet give them souls that soar. Every major character in Scandal is bored in some fundamental way, and instead of moping or griping or justfalling apart the m.o. of nearly all of our American suburban heroes they act boldly against the quietly oppressive machinery around them. They flee the IRS, they philander in the most breathtaking ways, they feed Keats into a supercomputer, they give up everything they have, again and again.
Next page