• Complain

Mark Feldstein - Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture

Here you can read online Mark Feldstein - Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Mark Feldstein Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture
  • Book:
    Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

From Publishers Weekly Feldstein, an award-winning journalist and professor at the University of Maryland, chronicles the controversial careers of two iconic figures, former president Richard Nixon and the investigative reported he feared most--Jack Anderson. With the astute analysis of a psychotherapist, Feldstein shows how the emotional and religious strengths, or flaws, of Nixon, the over-ambitious Quaker politician, and Anderson, the pious Mormon scribe, play out in a three-decade-long game to win over American public opinion. Whether Nixon was engineering a homosexual smear through wiretaps and doctored photos or the muckraking columnist was probing the Republicans hidden slush funds and numerous scandals, the book chronicles a slew of wrongdoings worthy of a sleazy pulp bestseller. Neither man escapes unscathed: Nixon, the schizoid schemer, or Anderson, the self-righteous campaigner. Brutal, brilliant, and gripping, this dark parable of tainted Beltway politics and an overreaching media lays the groundwork for the current cultural stench of celebrity exposes and bed-hopping lawmakers. (Sept.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved. From Booklist For a quarter of a century, politician Richard Nixon and columnist Jack Anderson engaged in a bitter battle royal, each occasionally using blackmail, bribery, spying, and burglary to try and defeat the other. Media scholar and former reporter Feldstein offers a deliciously detailed account of the backstory, fierce enmity, and legacy of scandalmongering and poisonous conflict between the media and political figures. Despite their similar backgroundsboth grew up in working-class families steeped in religion (Nixon a Quaker, Anderson a Mormon)they nurtured career ambitions, with no compunction about moral ambiguity, that eventually led them to Washington. While Nixon climbed through the ranks of the Republican Party until he reached the presidency, Anderson exceeded his mentor, Drew Pearson, to make his Merry-Go-Round column a powerful force for destroying political careers. The two battled through the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal, with Anderson riffling through garbage and bugging conversations to document each and every Nixon misstep, triggering Nixons retaliation with wiretaps, smears, and even a plot to kill Anderson. Feldstein delivers an engaging chronicle of the poisoned relationship between two powerful men and its lasting impact on political journalism. --Vanessa Bush

Mark Feldstein: author's other books


Who wrote Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

POISONING THE PRESS

POISONING THE PRESS

RICHARD NIXON, JACK ANDERSON, AND THE RISE OF WASHINGTONS SCANDAL CULTURE

MARK FELDSTEIN

FARRAR, STRAUS AND GIROUX NEW YORK

Farrar, Straus and Giroux

18 West 18th Street, New York 10011

Copyright 2010 by Mark Feldstein

All rights reserved

Distributed in Canada by D&M Publishers, Inc.

Printed in the United States of America

First edition, 2010

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Feldstein, Mark Avrom.

Poisoning the press : Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the rise of Washingtons scandal culture / Mark Feldstein. 1st ed.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-0-374-23530-7

1. Nixon, Richard M. (Richard Milhous), 19131994Relations with journalists. 2. Anderson, Jack, 19222005. 3. Press and politics United StatesHistory20th century. 4. PresidentsUnited StatesPress coverageCase studies. 5. United StatesPolitics and government19691974. 6. Political corruptionUnited StatesHistory 20th century. 7. Political cultureUnited StatesHistory20th century. 8. Political cultureWashington (D.C.)History20th century. 9. PresidentsUnited StatesBiography. 10. JournalistsUnited StatesBiography. I. Title.

E856.F45 2010

973.924092dc22

2010010272

Designed by Jonathan D. Lippincott

www.fsgbooks.com

1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

For Beth and Robbie,
my unconditional pride
and everlasting joy

One day well get themwell get them on the ground where we want them. And well stick our heels in, step on them hard, and twist.

Richard Nixon

Nothing produces such exhilaration, zest for daily life, and all-around gratification as a protracted, ugly, bitter-end vendetta that rages for years and exhausts both sides, often bringing one to ruin.

Jack Anderson

CONTENTS

POISONING THE PRESS

PROLOGUE

It seemed an unlikely spot to plan an assassination. After all, the Hay-Adams was once one of Washingtons most venerable old mansions, adorned with plush leather chairs, rich walnut paneling, and ornate oil paintings, located on Lafayette Square directly across the street from the White House. But on a chilly afternoon in March 1972, in one of the most bizarre and overlooked chapters of American political history, the luxury hotel did indeed serve as a launching pad for a murder conspiracy. More surprising still was the target of this assassination scheme, syndicated columnist Jack Anderson, then the most famous investigative reporter in the United States, whose exposs had plagued President Richard Nixon since he had first entered politics more than two decades earlier. Most astonishing of all, the men who plotted to execute the journalist were covert Nixon operatives dispatched after the President himself darkly informed aides that Anderson was a thorn in [his] side and that weve got to do something with this son of a bitch.

The conspirators included former agents of the FBI and CIA who had been trained in a variety of clandestine techniques, including assassinations, and who would later go to prison for their notorious break-in at Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate building. According to their own testimony, the men weighed various methods of eliminating the columnist: by spiking one of his drinks or his aspirin bottle with a special poison that would go undetected in an autopsy, or by putting LSD on his steering wheel so that he would absorb it through his skin while driving and die in a hallucination-crazed auto crash.

In one sense, the White House plot to poison a newsman was unprecedented. Certainly no other president in American history had ever been suspected of ordering a Mafia-style hit to silence a journalistic critic. Yet it was also an extreme and literal example of a larger conspiracy to contaminate the rest of the media as well, a metaphor for what would become a generation of toxic conflict between the press and the politicians they covered. It was not just that Nixons administration wiretapped journalists, put them on enemies lists, audited their tax returns, censored their newspapers, and moved to revoke their broadcasting licenses. It was, more lastingly, that Nixon and his staff pioneered the modern White House propaganda machine, using mass-market advertising techniques to manipulate its message in ways that all subsequent administrations would be forced to emulate. Nixon simultaneously introduced the notion of liberal media bias even as he launched a host of spinmeisters who assembled a network of conservative news outlets that would drive the political agenda into the twenty-first century. At the same time, Nixon and subsequent presidents effectively bought off news corporations by deregulating them, allowing them to gorge themselves on a noxious diet of sensationalism and trivialities that reaped record profits while debasing public discourse.

How did all of this come to pass? In many ways, the rise of Washingtons modern scandal culture began with Richard Nixon and Jack Anderson, and their blistering twenty-five-year battle symbolized and accelerated the growing conflict between the presidency and the press in the Cold War era. This bitter struggle between the most embattled politician and reviled investigative reporter of their time would lead to bribery and blackmail, forgery and burglary, sexual smears and secret surveillanceas well as the assassination plot. Their story reveals not only how one president sabotaged the press, but also how this rancorous relationship continues to the present day. It was Richard Nixons ultimate revenge.

It was this very lust for revengeNixons obsession with enemiesthat would destroy him in the end. In the Presidents eyes, his antagonists in what he called the Eastern establishment were legion: liberals, activists, intellectuals, members of Congress, the federal bureaucracy. But none was more roundly despised than the news media, and none in the media more than Jack Anderson, a bulldog of a reporter who pounded out his blunt accusations on the green keys of an old brown manual typewriter in an office three blocks from the White House. Although largely forgotten today, Anderson was once the most widely read and feared newsman in the United States, a self-proclaimed Paul Revere of journalism with a confrontational style that matched his beefy physique. Part freedom fighter, part carnival huckster, part righteous rogue, the flamboyant columnist was the last descendant of the crusading muckrakers of the early twentieth century. He held their lonely banner aloft in the conformist decades afterward, when deference to authority characterized American journalism and politics alike.

At his peak, Anderson reached an audience approaching seventy million peoplenearly the entire voting populacein radio and television broadcasts, magazines, newsletters, books, and speeches. But it was his daily 750-word expos, the Washington Merry-Go-Round, that was the primary source of his power; published in nearly one thousand newspapers, it became the longest-running and most popular syndicated column in the nation. Andersons expossacquired by eavesdropping, rifling through garbage, and swiping classified documentssent politicians to prison and led targets to commit suicide. He epitomized everything that Richard Nixon abhorred.

The President had always believed the press was out to get him, and in Anderson he found confirmation of his deepest anxieties. The newsman had a hand in virtually every key slash-and-burn attack on Nixon during his career, from the young congressmans earliest Red-baiting in the 1940s to his financial impropriety in the White House during the 1970s. Even Nixons most intimate psychiatric secrets were fodder for Andersons column. The battle between the two men lasted a generation, triggered by differences of politics and personality, centered on the most inflammatory Washington scandals of their era. In the beginning, Andersons relentless reporting helped plant the first seeds of Nixonian press paranoia. In the end, Andersons disclosures led to criminal convictions of senior presidential advisors and portions of articles of impeachment against the Chief Executive himself. The columnist both exposed and fueled the worst abuses of the Nixon White House, which eventually reached their apogee in the Watergate scandal that ended his presidency in disgrace.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture»

Look at similar books to Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture»

Discussion, reviews of the book Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washingtons Scandal Culture and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.