• Complain

Scott Hershovitz - Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids

Here you can read online Scott Hershovitz - Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: Penguin Publishing Group, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Scott Hershovitz Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids
  • Book:
    Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Publishing Group
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An NPR Best Book of 2022 * One of Christian Science Monitors 10 best books of May
This amazing new book . . . takes us on a journey through classic and contemporary philosophy powered by questions like What do we have the right to do? When is it okay to do this or that? They explore punishment and authority and sex and gender and race and the nature of truth and knowledge and the existence of God and the meaning of life and Scott just does an incredible job. Ryan Holiday, The Daily Stoic

Some of the best philosophers in the world gather in surprising placespreschools and playgrounds. They debate questions about metaphysics and morality, even though theyve never heard the words and perhaps cant even tie their shoes. Theyre kids. And as Scott Hershovitz shows in this delightful debut, theyre astoundingly good philosophers.
Hershovitz has two young sons, Rex and Hank. From the time they could talk, he noticed that they raised philosophical questions and were determined to answer them. They re-created ancient arguments. And they advanced entirely new ones. Thats not unusual, Hershovitz says. Every kid is a philosopher.
Following an agenda set by Rex and Hank, Hershovitz takes us on a fun romp through classic and contemporary philosophy, powered by questions like, Does Hank have the right to drink soda? When is it okay to swear? and, Does the number six exist? Hershovitz and his boys take on more weighty issues too. They explore punishment, authority, sex, gender, race, the nature of truth and knowledge, and the existence of God. Along the way, they get help from professional philosophers, famous and obscure. And they show that all of us have a lot to learn from listening to kidsand thinking with them.
Hershovitz calls on us to support kids in their philosophical adventures. But more than that, he challenges us to join them so that we can become better, more discerning thinkers and recapture some of the wonder kids have at the world.

Scott Hershovitz: author's other books


Who wrote Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
PENGUIN PRESS An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC penguinrandomhousecom - photo 1
PENGUIN PRESS An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC penguinrandomhousecom - photo 2

PENGUIN PRESS

An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC

penguinrandomhouse.com

Copyright 2022 by Scott Hershovitz

Penguin supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin to continue to publish books for every reader.

Passages adapted from Taylor Swift, Philosopher of Forgiveness (The New York Times, September 7, 2019) reprinted by permission of The New York Times.

The Death of Big Bob (Letter to the Editor, The Globe and Mail, March 4, 2008) by Derek Wilson reprinted by permission of the author.

library of congress cataloging-in-publication data

Names: Hershovitz, Scott, author.

Title: Nasty, brutish, and short : adventures in philosophy with my kids / Scott Hershovitz.

Description: New York : Penguin Press, 2022. | Includes bibliographical references and index.

Identifiers: LCCN 2021035834 (print) | LCCN 2021035835 (ebook) | ISBN 9781984881816 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781984881823 (ebook)

Subjects: LCSH: PhilosophyStudy and teaching. | Children and philosophy.

Classification: LCC B52 .H47 2022 (print) | LCC B52 (ebook) | DDC 107dc23

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021035834

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021035835

designed by meighan cavanaugh, adapted for ebook by shayan saalabi

pid_prh_6.0_140118227_c0_r1

To Julie, Rex, and Hank

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION THE ART OF THINKING I nee a philosopher Hank was standing in - photo 3
INTRODUCTION
THE ART OF THINKING I nee a philosopher Hank was standing in the bathroom - photo 4
THE ART OF THINKING

I nee a philosopher. Hank was standing in the bathroom, half-naked.

What? Julie asked.

I nee a philosopher.

Did you rinse?

I nee a philosopher, Hank said, getting more agitated.

You need to rinse. Go back to the sink.

I nee a philosopher! Hank demanded.

Scott! Julie shouted. Hank needs a philosopher.

I am a philosopher. And no one has ever needed me. I rushed to the bathroom. Hank, Hank! Im a philosopher. What do you need?

He looked puzzled. You are not a philosopher, he said sharply.

Hank, I am a philosopher. Thats my job. Whats bothering you?

He opened his mouth but didnt say anything.

Hank, whats bothering you?

DERS FOMETHING FUCK IN MY FEETH.

A flosser. Hank needed a flosserone of those forked pieces of plastic with dental floss strung across it. In retrospect, that makes sense. A flosser is something you could need, especially if you are two and your purpose in life is to pack landfills with cheap pieces of plastic that provided a temporary diversion. A philosopher is not something that people need. People like to point that out to philosophers.

What do philosophers do exactly Um uh we think mostly What do you - photo 5

What do philosophers do, exactly?

Um, uh... we think, mostly.

What do you think about?

Anything, really. Justice, fairness, equality, religion, law, language...

I think about those things. Am I a philosopher?

You might be. Do you think about them carefully?

I cannot count the number of times that Ive had that conversation. But thats because Ive never had it. Its just how I imagine things would go if I were to tell a stranger that Im a philosopher. I almost always say that I am a lawyer. Unless I am talking to a lawyer; then I say that Im a law professor, so that I can pull rank. If I am talking to another law professor, though, then Im definitely a philosopher. But if I am talking to a philosopher, Im back to being a lawyer. Its an elaborate shell game, carefully constructed to give me an edge in any conversation.

But I am a philosopher. And I still find that improbable. I didnt set out to be one. As a first-semester freshman at the University of Georgia, I wanted to take Intro Psychology. But the class was full, and Intro Philosophy fulfilled a requirement. If a spot had come open in that psychology class, then I might be a psychologist and this book might be full of practical parenting advice. There is a bit of parenting advice in this book, but most of it is not so practical. Indeed, my main advice is just this: talk to your kids (or somebody elses). Theyre funny as helland good philosophers too.

I missed the first day of that philosophy class, because my peopleJews, not philosopherscelebrate the New Year at a more or less random time each fall. But I went to the second class, and by the second hour I was hooked. The professor, Clark Wolf, asked each of us what mattered, and as he went around the room, he scratched our answers on the board alongside our names and the names of famous philosophers who had said something similar.

Happiness: Robyn, Lila, Aristotle

Pleasure: Anne, Aristippus, Epicurus

Doing the Right Thing: Scott, Neeraj, Kant

Nothing: Vijay, Adrian, Nietzsche

Seeing my name on the board made me think that my thoughts about what mattered might matterthat I could be a part of a conversation that included people like Aristotle, Kant, and Nietzsche.

It was a crazy thing to think, and my parents were not happy to find me thinking it. I remember sitting across from my father in a rotisserie chicken restaurant, reporting that I planned to major in philosophy. Whats philosophy? he asked. That is a good question. He didnt know the answer because when he registered for classes, there was a spot left in psychology, and that became his major. But I realized that I had a problem: I didnt know the answer either, and I had been in a philosophy class for several weeks. What is philosophy, I wondered, and why do I want to study it?

I decided to show my dad rather than tell him. We think were sitting at a table, eating rotisserie chicken and having a conversation about how college is going, I started. But what if we arent? What if someone stole our brains, put them in a vat, hooked them up to electrodes, and stimulated them so as to make us think that were eating chicken and talking about college?

Can they do that? he asked.

I dont think so, but thats not the question. The question is how do we know that they didnt? How do we know that we arent brains in vats, hallucinating a chicken dinner?

Thats what you want to study? The look on his face was something other than encouraging.

Yeah, I mean, dont you see the worry? Everything we think we know could be wrong.

He did not see the worry. And this was before The Matrix came out, so I couldnt appeal to the authority of Keanu Reeves to establish the urgency of the issue. After a few more minutes of muttering about brains and vats, I added, The department has lots of logic classes too.

Well, he said, I hope you take those.

I said that its improbable that Im a philosopher But thats not right Whats - photo 6
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids»

Look at similar books to Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids»

Discussion, reviews of the book Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy with My Kids and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.