Massad Ayoob - Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort
Here you can read online Massad Ayoob - Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: F+W Media, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort
- Author:
- Publisher:F+W Media
- Genre:
- Year:2012
- Rating:4 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
- 80
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
In this excerpt from the Gun Digest Book of Concealed Carry, Massad Ayoob gives his thoughts and recommendations on the sometimes controversial mode of open carry.
Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
In days of old, Americans often carried handguns openly in public. Not because they were police or anything, but because (a) it was their right, and (b) in certain parts of a young frontier nation, it was expected of them.
Among those of us who are advocates for the civil rights of gun owners, there are some who think the time is ripe for a return to this conceptand there are those who not only dont feel a need to resurrect the old paradigm, but believe it might actually be counter-productive to our side of the Second Amendment battle.
As with most intense debates, there are sound arguments on both sides of the issue.
The arguments in favor of private citizens carrying loaded handguns exposed to plain sight in public seem to break down as follows:
Crime deterrence. This philosophy holds that criminals who were thinking of robbing this convenience store or that bank will abort their mission when they see a gun on the hip of a citizen. On a more personal level, they argue, it will tend to deter criminals who have targeted specific individuals for crimes against the person, such as mugging or rape, in lonely places deliberately selected by the predator for being remote from police assistance.
Good public relations for gun owners. The theory advanced by advocates of open carry is that when the public gets used to seeing their neighbors and other good people carrying guns in plain sight, theyll lose their fear of firearms and become more amenable to supporting gun owners rights.
Convenience. Particularly in warm places, it is often uncomfortable to wear a concealing garment. The plain hip holster worn exposed is simply more comfortable and convenient than a belly-band, a shoulder rig, or an inside the waistband holster, before you even consider the potential discomfort of an additional piece of clothing to hide a gun.
The exercise of rights. This argument comes with a powerful sound bite: A right that is not exercised will wither away.
These arguments come, not from anti-gun groups or other opponents of civil rights, but from armed American citizens who are neither uniformed security professionals nor police officers, but simply dont like the idea of carrying their guns out in the open before the eyes of the general public.
Open carry invites disarming. Those who prefer to carry their guns concealed point to all the police officers who have been killed with their own weapons. They prefer to keep their guns hidden on their person, where only they know where they are.
Open carry sacrifices the advantage of surprise. Concealed carry advocates point out that the decades-old archives of the Armed Citizen columns in the National Rifle Associations American Rifleman magazine show countless cases of armed citizens who only won their armed encounters because they were able to draw from concealment and take their criminal opponents by surprise, an advantage that would have been lost if the assailants could have seen beforehand that they were armed.
Open carry makes enemies for the pro-gun movement, instead of friends. The vast majority of the American public does not carry guns openly on city streets and do not see others that they know to be law-abiding private citizens do so. Therefore, says this argument, they are frightened when they observe guns worn openly by people not readily identified as those they are socialized to seeing armed, such as armed guards and police officers, and are therefore frightened when they see ordinary folks with guns on their hips.
Open carry advocates are just show-offs crying for attention. This is probably the least effective argument for concealed as opposed to open carry.
For those of us who go armed, open versus concealed carry is an intensely personal issue. It is only fair to the reader that they know the personal experiences of anyone addressing that issue, since such personal experiences can create preconditioned bias or prejudice. Any opinion must be seen in the light of the person doing the opining.
This writer has been carrying concealed since the age of 12. In a time and place where a permit was only required to carry a concealed and loaded handgun in public, and in which the chief of police of the city in question had told my father and me that it was perfectly legal for my young self to carry loaded and concealed inside our family-owned place of business so long as I didnt step out on the sidewalk so armed, it gave me an early start on the concept. I have open-carried as a sworn, part-time police officer for thirty-some years, which doesnt really count except for the deterrence argument on one side and the exposed to disarming attempts argument on the other, but have also open-carried in plainclothes from Arizona to North Carolina on city streets.
And, in those capacities, I have seen things that support both sides.
In Arizona, a friend and I were in a convenience store between Prescott and Paulden on the way to Gunsite Training Center. My friend came from a state that then had no provision for private citizens to carry a handgun in any fashion, and was luxuriating in his ability under Arizona law to carry his custom Colt 45 auto in an exposed holster. I was a few steps away when I saw a man walk in, do a double take when he spotted the gun, and deliver a target stare to the loaded pistol. Almost in exaggerated pantomime, he mugged an expression of outrage and pointed at the pistol, making eye contact with others in the store that indicated his outrage. And then, that man moved in behind my friend, reaching out for the holstered pistol.
I stepped between them, glaring at the interloper. He stopped, looked at me, obviously decided that whatever was going to happen wasnt worth it, and walked away with an angry look on his face. I dont think he was going to try to shoot anyone with my friends gun, but he was obviously going to grab it and do some show-off thing, which could have led to a struggle for a loaded gun in a crowded convenience store, with an obviously high potential for tragedy. Score one for the case against wearing an exposed handgun in public.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort»
Look at similar books to Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Gun Digests Open Carry vs. Concealed eShort and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.