Clifford Simak - Why Call Them Back from Heaven
Here you can read online Clifford Simak - Why Call Them Back from Heaven full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. genre: Science fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:Why Call Them Back from Heaven
- Author:
- Genre:
- Rating:3 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
- 60
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Why Call Them Back from Heaven: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Why Call Them Back from Heaven" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Why Call Them Back from Heaven — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Why Call Them Back from Heaven" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Clifford D. Simak
Why Call Them Back from Heaven
1
The jury chortled happily. The type bars blurred with frantic speed as they set down the Verdict, snaking smoothly across the roll of paper.
Then the Verdict ended and the judge nodded to the clerk, who stepped up to the Jury and tore off the Verdict. He held it ritually in two hands and turned toward the judge.
"The defendant," said the judge, "will rise and face the Jury."
Franklin Chapman rose shakily to his feet and Ann Harrison rose as well and stood beside him. She reached out a hand and laid it on his arm. Through the fabric of his shirt she felt the quiver of his flesh.
I should have done a better job, she told herself. Although, in all fact, she knew, she had worked harder on this case than she had on many others. Her heart had gone out to this man beside her, so pitiful and trapped. Perhaps, she thought, a woman had no right to defend a man in a court like this. In the ancient days, when the Jury had been human, it might have been all right. But not in a court where a computer was the Jury and the only point at issue was the meaning of the law.
"The clerk," said the judge, "now will read the Verdict."
She glanced at the prosecutor, sitting at his table, his face as stern and pontifical as it had been throughout the trial. An instrument, she thoughtjust an instrument, as the Jury was an instrument of justice.
The room was quiet and somber, with the sun of late afternoon shining through the windows. The newsmen sat in the front row seats, watching for the slightest flicker of emotion, for the tiny gesture of significance, for the slightest crumb upon which to build a story. The cameras were there as well, their staring lenses set to record this moment when eternity and nothingness quavered in the balance.
Although, Ann knew, there could be little doubt. There had been so little upon which to build a case. The Verdict would be death.
The clerk began to read:
"In the case of the State versus Franklin Chapman, the finding is that the said Chapman, the defendant in this action, did, through criminal negligence and gross lack of responsibility, so delay the recovery of the corpse of one Amanda Hackett as to make impossible the preservation of her body, resulting in conclusive death to her total detriment.
"The contention of the defendant that he, personally, was not responsible for the operating efficiency and the mechanical condition of the vehicle employed in the attempt to retrieve the body of the said Amanda Hackett, is impertinent to this action. His total responsibility encompassed the retrieval of the body by all and every means and to this over-all responsibility no limitations are attached. There may be others who will be called upon to answer to this matter of irresponsibility, but the measure of their innocence or guilt can have no bearing upon the issue now before the court.
"The defendant is judged guilty upon each and every count. In lack of extenuating circumstances, no recommendation for mercy can be made."
Chapman sank slowly down into his chair and sat there, straight and stiff, his great mechanic's hands clasped tightly together on the table, his face a frozen slab.
All along, Ann Harrison told herself, he had known how it would be. That was why he was taking it so well. He had not been fooled a minute by her lawyer talk or by her assurances. She had tried to hold him together and she need not have bothered, for all along. he'd known how it was and he'd made his bargain with himself and now he was keeping it.
"Would defense counsel," asked the judge, "care to make a motion?"
Said Ann, "If Your Honor pleases."
He is a good man, Ann told herself. He's trying to be kind, but he can't be kind. The law won't let him be. He'll listen to my motion and he will deny it and then pronounce the sentence and that will be the end of it. For there was nothing more that anyone could do. In the light of evidence, no appeal was possible.
She glanced at the waiting newsmen, at the scanning television eyes, and felt a little tremor of panic running in her veins. Was it wise, she asked herself, this move that she had planned? Futile, certainly; she knew that it was futile. But aside from its futility, how about the wisdom of it?
And in that instant of her hesitation, she knew that she had to do it, that it lay within the meaning of her duty and she could not fail that duty.
"Your Honor," she said, "I move that the Verdict be set aside on the grounds of prejudice."
The prosecutor bounded to his feet.
His Honor waved him back into his chair.
"Miss Harrison," said the judge, "I am not certain that I catch your meaning. Upon what grounds do you mention prejudice?"
She walked around the table so that she might better face the judge.
"On the grounds," she said, "that the key evidence
concerned mechanical failure of the vehicle the defendant used in his official duties."
The judge nodded gravely. "I agree with you. But how can the character of the evidence involve prejudice?"
"Your Honor," said Ann Harrison, "the Jury also is mechanical."
The prosecutor was on his feet again.
"Your Honor!" he brayed. "Your Honor!"
The judge banged his gavel.
"I can take care of this," he told the prosecutor, sternly.
The newsmen were astir, making notes, whispering among themselves. The television lenses seemed to shine more brightly.
The prosecutor sat down. The buzz subsided. The room took on a deadly quiet.
"Miss Harrison," asked the judge, "you challenge the objectivity of the Jury?"
"Yes, Your Honor. Where machines may be involved. I do not claim it is a conscious prejudice, but I do claim that unconscious prejudice"
"Ridiculous!" said the prosecutor, loudly.
The judge shook his gavel at him.
"You be quiet," he said.
"But I do claim," said Ann, "that a subconscious prejudice could be involved. And I further contend that in any mechanical contrivance there is one lacking quality essential to all justicethe sense of mercy and of human worth. There is law, I'll grant you, a superhuman, total knowledge of the law, but"
"Miss Harrison," said the judge, "you're lecturing the court."
"I beg Your Honor's pardon."
"You are finished, then?"
"I believe I am, Your Honor."
"All right, then. I'll deny this motion. Have you any others?"
"No, Your Honor."
She went around the table, but did not sit down.
"In that case," said the judge, "there is no need to delay the sentence. Nor have I any latitude. The law in cases such as this is expressly specific. The defendant will stand."
Slowly Chapman got to his feet.
"Franklin Chapman," said the judge, "it is the determination of this court that you, by your conviction of these charges and in the absence of any recommendation for mercy, shall forfeit the preservation of your body at the time of death. Your civil rights, however, are in no other way impaired."
He banged his gavel.
"This case is closed," he said.
2
During the night someone had scrawled a slogan on the wall of a dirty red brick building that stood across the street. The heavy yellow chalk marks read:
WHY CALL THEM BACK FBOM HEAVEN?
Daniel Frost wheeled his tiny two-place car into its space in one of the parking lots outside Forever Center and got out, standing for a moment to stare at the sign.
There had been a lot of them recently, chalked here and everywhere, and he wondered, a little idly, what was going on that would bring about such a rash of them. Undoubtedly Marcus Appleton could tell him if he asked about it, but Appleton, as security chief of Forever Center, was a busy man and in the last few weeks Frost had seen him, to speak to, only once or twice. But if there were anything unusual going on, he was sure that Marcus would be on top of it. There wasn't much, he comforted himself, that Marcus didn't know about.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Why Call Them Back from Heaven»
Look at similar books to Why Call Them Back from Heaven. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Why Call Them Back from Heaven and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.