David Simpson - Post-Human Trilogy

Hi! Thank you so much for reading my book! I hope you enjoy it. It is always an honor when someone takes the time to read one of my novels and I feel humbled and thankful. I owe you one! If you do enjoy the book, please remember to tell a friend or two (or two thousand) about it. Best of all is a positive review on Amazon.com. At this stage in my writing career, word of mouth is better than gold and is the best way for me to reach a large audience and achieve my dream of writing full time one day soon.

I want to be available and interactive with my readers, so you can actually friend me on Facebook, like the Facebook page for Post-Human, read my blog, follow me on Twitter, or check out my website. Im also on goodreads.com and love to hear from readers and correspond with them about their experiences with my books.

So, thanks again, and hopefully, this will be the beginning of a long, rewarding, and beautiful relationship between reader and author.

Yours,

David Simpson

Thank you to my editor, Autumn J. Conley, for being so thorough, creative, and awesome.

Thanks also to my beta readers, Curtis Hox (the awesome pro), Patrick Weddell (my technical advisor), Matthew Drummey (my gracious reader), and Jeremiah Wood (my military expert).

Thank you also to Sandra and Brian Degrechie, Melanie Klein, Aria Cheng, Sanha Cho, Daniel Lee, and Lisa Kelly-Wilson for allowing me the use of their names.

Thank you to the hundreds of supportive readers who have taken time out of their busy lives to leave positive reviews on Amazon. I owe so much to you. Thank you also to the tens of thousands of people who have downloaded copies of this series in the last few months. Im blown away.

And lastly, thank you to my wife, Jennifer, who makes these books possible. I cant believe how much work you put into them and how incredible your support is. Youre the coolest woman in the universe, and all other universes too!

Interviewer: With us is presumptive Presidential nominee, Senator Morgan, for his first major interview since sweeping the Super Tuesday primary contests less than twenty-four hours ago. Congratulations on your victories, Senator and for locking down the nomination so quickly.

Morgan: Thank you very much, Anderson.

Interviewer: Now that your opponents have suspended their campaigns, are you surprised at all with how quickly youve managed to dispatch your competition? You were, after all, facing two candidates that were far better funded than yourself throughout most of the early primary season. Yet here we are in the middle of March, and youre already uncontested and headed for the general election.

Morgan: Im not surprised at all, actually, given that the stakes were so high. The choice was crystal clear for voters, and they resoundingly chose to cherish and protect human life. No amount of funding would have been enough to confuse the issue for the American people in the primaries, and no amount of funding will be enough to confuse it for them in the general election either.

Interviewer: By protecting human life, you are, of course, referring to your signature issuethat being that you want to outlaw what is known as strong artificial intelligence.

Morgan: Its not just my signature issueits the most important issue in the history of our species. Its about species dominance

Interviewer: And the history of our species is 6,000 years? Since Adam and Eve?

Morgan: Listen, Anderson, Im not going to play that game. This is too important

Interviewer: Im just trying to clarify

Morgan: No, youre not. Youre doing a hit job on me, as I knew you would.

Interviewer: Im just clarifying

Morgan: Youre doing a hit job for the incumbentthe President of the United Statesas I expected.

Interviewer: Senator, you said during the primaries that you believed in Adam and Eve

Morgan: Im not going to be debating theology or my personal religious beliefs with you, Anderson. I am not taking that bait. What I am going to do is voice the concerns of the majority of Americans, whether your friend the President likes it or not.

Interviewer: I cannot deny, Senator Morgan, that you have voiced the concerns of about half the American electorate. Stats have shown that 47 percent of Americans say they strongly oppose the development of strong A.I., which is part of why you were able to use your unofficial status as the head of the Purist movement in the United States to beat back your better-funded opponents.

Morgan: The Purist movement is bigger than any one man.

Interviewer: Well, it may be bigger than you, sir, but you must admit that it was your wedge issue.

Morgan: You think youre so clever, dont you?

Interviewer: Excuse me?

Morgan: You do. Admit it. You ask me questions and smirk away, but you have no idea whats coming. You and your pseudo-intellectual establishment. The people of this country know whats coming. They know the choice that they have in this election. Thats why I accepted the invitation to be here today. No amount of personal character assassination against me is going to confuse this issue in the minds of the American public.

Interviewer: Okay, so lets discuss the issue at hand, then.

Morgan: All right.

Interviewer: Its your position that the United States should use its power within the new Democratic Union to push for a ban on artificial intelligence worldwide, correct?

Morgan: Lets be crystal clear, because this is a crucial point.

Interviewer: Okay.

Morgan: Its not my position that we should use our power to push for a banits my position that we should use our power to insist on a ban. And I am not personally against the development of artificial intelligence. A.I. is all around us

Interviewer: Yes, I was going to ask you about your own personal use

Morgan: Im not against artificial intelligence. What Im against is strong A.I. I am against artificial intelligence that is capable of passing the Turing test and that has the potential to become infinitely more intelligent than human beings.

Interviewer: But, Senator, A.I. is already stronger than us at most types of thinking

Morgan: Most types of thinking? I dont know where youre getting your information, Anderson, but thats simply not true.

Interviewer: Okaymany types of thinkingis that a fair statement?

Morgan: Its faster, sure.

Interviewer: So, if computers have already surpassed us in many respects, isnt the Turing test an anthropocentric and, therefore, irrelevant way of evaluating

Morgan: No, its not. The Turing test determines whether or not a computer is conscious. Thats the whole point of it.

Interviewer: Dont you think that might be debatable?

Morgan: We dont have time for that type of academic debate.

Interviewer: No time for debate, Senator?

Morgan: The Turing test is the only agreed-upon

Interviewer: No time for debate in a democracy?

Morgan: Let me finish. The Turing test is the only agreed-upon test in which all parties agree that, when a computer passes it, that computer will have reached human levels in all respects. We wont have any cognitive advantages over a machine like thatwell be demoted to the second-smartest species on the planet. Like the dolphins. Ask them how that worked out for them.