• Complain

Paul Anthony Rahe - Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece

Here you can read online Paul Anthony Rahe - Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1994, publisher: University of North Carolina Press, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of North Carolina Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1994
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An assessment of the ancient Greek city and its subsequent influence. A masterwork of political theory and comparative politics for the classroom.
In a series of sketches touching on everything from the lust for honor to the suspicion of commerce and philosophy, from the role of homoerotic bonds in maintaining military formations to the distrust of technological innovation, Rahe brilliantly reminds us how utterly committed the Greeks were to a politics in which the distribution of honors, education and culture in all their forms, and economic activity were all designed to preserve civic solidarity.--Jack N. Rakove,American Historical Review
[An] extraordinary book. . . . It is a great achievement and will stay as a landmark.--Patrick Leigh Fermor,The Spectator(London)
A work of magisterial erudition.--Journal of American History

Paul Anthony Rahe: author's other books


Who wrote Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Republics Ancient and Modern Republics Ancient and Modern was originally - photo 1
Republics Ancient and Modern

Republics Ancient and Modern was originally published in hardcover in one volume by the University of North Carolina Press in 1992. Both the initial research and the publication of this work were made possible in part through grants from the Division of Research Programs of the National Endowment for the Humanities, an independent federal agency whose mission is to award grants to support education, scholarship, media programming, libraries, and museums in order to bring the results of cultural activities to a broad, general public.

Publication of this book was also aided by grants from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the Earhart Foundation, and the John M. Olin Foundation.

1994 The University of North Carolina Press

All rights reserved

Manufactured in the United States of America

Library of Congress

Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Rahe, Paul Anthony.

Republics ancient and modern / by Paul A. Rahe.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: v. 1. The Ancien regime in classical Greecev. 2. New modes and orders in Early Modern political thoughtv. 3. Inventions of prudence: constituting the American regime. 1. United StatesPolitics and government17751783. 2. Political scienceUnited States-History18th century. 3. Republicanism History. 4. Political scienceGreeceHistory. I. Title.

E210.R335 1994

321.86dc20

94.5728

CIP

ISBN-13: 978-0-8078-4473-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) (v. 1)

ISBN-13: 978-0-8078-4474-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) (v. 2)

ISBN-13: 978-0-8078-4475-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) (v. 3)

The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.

11 10 09 08 07

8 7 6 5 4

THIS BOOK WAS DIGITALLY PRINTED.

DONALD KAGAN

W. G. G. FORREST

Magistris Optimis

Preface

More than ten years ago, I set out to transform my dissertation into a pub-lishable monograph. In the course of making the attempt, I paused in my work, unhappy with the conceptual framework into which I was trying to fit the pieces of the puzzle constituted by late fifth-century Sparta and Athens. I then thought that I would better be able to deal with those scattered fragments of information if I first clarified my own thinking about the character of ancient politics by composing a brief article comparing the constitution of ancient Lacedaemon with that of the modern United States. Had I had any notion at the time of the enormity of the task that I was then taking on, I would no doubt have jettisoned the project right then and there.

When I began that essay in comparative politics, I presumed that I knew virtually all that I needed to know about modern republicanism. I had been born in such a republic. I had grown up there, and I had spent three glorious years in Great Britain, studying ancient history and observing the politics of that remarkable polity at close hand. But, as I pursued my new project, I lost my wayor, rather, discovered that I had never had a very good grasp of where I wasand gradually I came to find strange and mysterious that which had always seemed familiar and obvious. The more I learned about the foundations of modern politics, the less I found that I could depend upon that which I had been taught and had always been inclined to take for granted. And so what began as an attempt to elucidate the character of ancient politics became as much, if not more, a study of modernity.

So, let the reader be warned. This three-volume work is not a summary of the received wisdom concerning the republics of ancient Greece, the political speculation of early modern Europe, and the character of the American founding. Moreover, it is unlikely that the arbiters of intellectual fashion will ever find my thinking congenial. In the three spheres discussed, I have not only broken with the orthodoxy currently reigning in the academy; I have also eschewed the latest trends; and I suspect that many, both in and outside our universities, will find what I have to say unsettling. Thus, for example, where present-minded ancient historians are inclined to place emphasis on the institutions or to stress the sociology of the ancient Greek city and to treat Athens as an exemplar, I present the world of the plls in the light cast by the regime-analysis of Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, and the like, and I try to show that the ancient tendency to prefer Sparta to Athens made considerable sense. Similarly, where students of early modern political thought now stress the continuity between the ancients and the moderns, I contend that there was a decisive break, disguised somewhat by the need of the latter to circumvent censorship and to make the new thinking more persuasive by presenting it in a fashion designed to soothe rather than shock, and I argue, therefore, that Machiavelli, Harrington, the radical Whigs, and Lord Boling-broke were as much opposed to classical republicanism as Hobbes, Locke, Hume, and Montesquieu. And finally, where American historians debate whether the regime produced by the American Revolution was republican or liberal, ancient or modern, or simply confused, I argue that it was a deliberately contrived mixed regime of sortsliberal and modern, first of all, but in its insistence that to vindicate human dignity one must demonstrate mans capacity for self-government, republican and classical as well. In short, it is my contention that we cannot understand our own situation without thinking a great deal about the politics of antiquity and the speculation of early modern times. Moreover, if I am correct, the modern social science that customarily guides our reflections with regard to this question is itself the chief obstacle to our understanding that which we most need to know. To put it bluntly, these volumes are intended solely for those willing to pause and rethink.

Because I address in these pages questions of permanent public interest, I have tried to make my argument and the evidence on which it is based as accessible as possible to the general reader. To that end, I have cited, where available, English translations of the secondary works which I have found useful, and I have in every case provided translations of the pertinent primary source material. Moreover, where the inclusion of a critical word or phrase in the original language may alert readers familiar with that language to my particular interpretation of the passage or to something going on in the text cited that I have been unable to capture fully in translation, I have provided such information as well. All of the translations, unless otherwise indicated, are my own. In quoting works published in English, I have nearly always retained the original spelling, punctuation, and emphasis. Exceptions are specified in the notes or marked by brackets in the text. In the last note to the introduction to each volume, I have listed books and articles, pertinent to the themes of that volume, which have appeared or come to my attention since the original edition went to press.

Washington, D.C.

18 December 1993

Acknowledgments

En route to publishing these three volumes, I have accumulated a great many debts. Some are exclusively professional. As anyone who peruses my notes will discover, I have read widely in the secondary literature of the three fields covered in this work, and I have learned a great deal from those who have preceded menot least, let me add, from those whose opinions I challenge here. As will be evident, I owe much to the late M.I. Finley and Louis Gernet, to G. E. M. de Ste. Croix, Jean-Pierre Vernant, Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Marcel Dtienne, and to their many students and associates; to John Dunn, Quentin Skinner, J. G. A. Pocock, and those who have succumbed to their influence; to the late Leo Strauss and his many, intrepid admirers; and to the late Hannah Arendt, to Bernard Bailyn, Gordon S. Wood, Joyce Appleby, Lance Banning, and to those who have further elaborated their various arguments.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece»

Look at similar books to Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece»

Discussion, reviews of the book Republics Ancient and Modern, Volume I: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.