• Complain

Max Hastings - Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945

Here you can read online Max Hastings - Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A vivid and incisive portrait of Winston Churchill during wartime from acclaimed historian Max Hastings, Winstons War captures the full range of Churchills endlessly fascinating character. At once brilliant and infuriating, self-important and courageous, Hastingss Churchill comes brashly to life as never before. Beginning in 1940, when popular demand elevated Churchill to the role of prime minister, and concluding with the end of the war, Hastings shows us Churchill at his most intrepid and essential, when, by sheer force of will, he kept Britain from collapsing in the face of what looked like certain defeat. Later, we see his significance ebb as the United States enters the war and the Soviets turn the tide on the Eastern Front. But Churchill, Hastings reminds us, knew as well as anyone that the war would be dominated by others, and he managed his relationships with the other Allied leaders strategically, so as to maintain Britains influence and limit Stalins gains. At the same time, Churchill faced political peril at home, a situation for which he himself was largely to blame. Hastings shows how Churchill nearly squandered the miraculous escape of the British troops at Dunkirk and failed to address fundamental flaws in the British Army. His tactical inaptitude and departmental meddling won him few friends in the military, and by 1942, many were calling for him to cede operational control. Nevertheless, Churchill managed to exude a public confidence that brought the nation through the bitter war. Hastings rejects the traditional Churchill hagiography while still managing to capture what he calls Churchills appetite for the fray. Certain to be a classic, Winstons War is a riveting profile of one of the greatest leaders of the twentieth century.

Max Hastings: author's other books


Who wrote Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
ALSO BY MAX HASTINGS REPORTAGE America 1968 The Fire This Time Ulster - photo 1

ALSO BY MAX HASTINGS

REPORTAGE

America 1968: The Fire This Time
Ulster 1969: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Northern Ireland
The Battle for the Falklands
(with Simon Jenkins)

BIOGRAPHY

Montrose: The Kings Champion
Yoni: Hero of Entebbe

AUTOBIOGRAPHY

Going to the Wars
Editor

MILITARY HISTORY

Bomber Command
The Battle of Britain
(with Len Deighton)
Das Reich
Overlord
Victory in Europe
The Korean War
Warriors: Extraordinary Tales from the Battlefield
Armageddon: The Battle for Germany, 19441945
Retribution: The Battle for Japan, 194445

COUNTRYSIDE WRITING

Outside Days
Scattered Shots
Country Fair

ANTHOLOGY (Edited)

The Oxford Book of Military Anecdotes

In memory of Roy Jenkins and our Indian summer friendship It may well be that - photo 2

In memory of Roy Jenkins,
and our Indian summer friendship

It may well be that the most glorious chapters of our history have yet to be written. Indeed, the very problems and dangers that encompass us and our country ought to make English men and women of this generation glad to be here at such a time. We ought to rejoice at the responsibilities with which destiny has honoured us, and be proud that we are guardians of our country in an age when her life is at stake.

Winston Spencer Churchill, April 1933

History with its flickering lamp stumbles along the trail of the past, trying to reconstruct its scenes, to revive its echoes, and kindle with pale gleams the passion of former days.

Winston Spencer Churchill, November 1940

Contents

21.

Maps

Introduction C HURCHILL was the greatest Englishman and one of the greatest - photo 3

Introduction C HURCHILL was the greatest Englishman and one of the greatest - photo 4

Introduction

C HURCHILL was the greatest Englishman and one of the greatest human beings of the twentieth century, indeed of all time. Yet, beyond that bald assertion, there are infinite nuances in considering his conduct of Britains war between 1940 and 1945, which is the theme of this book. It originated nine years ago, when Roy Jenkins was writing his biography of Churchill. Roy flattered me by inviting my comments on the typescript, chapter by chapter. Some of my suggestions he accepted; many he sensibly ignored. When we reached the Second World War, his patience expired. Exasperated by the profusion of my strictures, he said: Youre trying to get me to do something which you should write yourself, if you want to! By that time, his health was failing. He was impatient to finish his own book, which achieved triumphant success before his death.

In the years which followed, I thought much about Churchill and the war, mindful of some Boswellian lines about Samuel Johnson: He had once conceived of one soldier of Britains Eighth Army derived from a day in 1942 when he found the prime minister his neighbour in a North African desert latrine. Churchills speeches and writings fill many volumes.

Yet much remains opaque, because he wished it thus. Always mindful of his role as a stellar performer upon the stage of history, he became supremely so after May 10, 1940. He kept no diary because, he observed, to do so would be to expose his follies and inconsistencies to posterity. Within months of his ascent to the premiership, however, he told his staff that he had already schemed the chapters of the book which he would write as soon as the war was over. The outcome was a ruthlessly partial six-volume work which is poor history, if sometimes peerless prose. We shall never know with complete confidence what he thought about many personalitiesfor instance Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Brooke, King George VI, his Cabinet colleaguesbecause he took good care not to tell us.

Churchills wartime relationship with the British people was much more complex than is often acknowledged. Few denied his claims upon the premiership. But between the end of the Battle of Britain in 1940 and El Alamein in November 1942, not only many ordinary citizens, but also some of his closest colleagues wanted operational control of the war machine to be removed from his hands, and some other figure appointed to his role as minister of defence. It is hard to overstate the embarrassment and even shame of the British people, as they perceived the Russians playing a heroic part in the struggle against Nazism, while their own army seemed incapable of winning a battle. To understand Britains wartime experience, it appears essential to recognise, as some narratives do not, the sense of humiliation which afflicted Britain amid the failures of its soldiers, contrastedalbeit often on the basis of wildly false informationwith the achievements of Stalin.

Churchill was dismayed by the performance of the British Army, even after victories began to come at the end of 1942. Himself a hero, he expected others likewise to show themselves heroes. In 1940, the people of Britain, together with their navy and air force, wonderfully fulfilled his hopes. Thereafter, however, much of the story of Britains part in the war seems to me that of the prime minister seeking more from his nations warriors than they could deliver. The failure of the army to match the prime ministers aspirations is among the central themes of this book.

Much discussion of Britains military effort in World War II focuses upon Churchills relationship with his generals. In my view, this preoccupation is overdone. The difficulties of fighting the Germans and Japanese went much deeper than could be solved by changes of commanders. The British were beaten again and again between 1940 and 1942, and continued to suffer battlefield difficulties thereafter, in consequence of failures of tactics, weapons, equipment and culture even more significant than lack of mass or inspired leadership. The gulf between Churchillian aspiration and reality extended to the peoples of occupied Europe, hence his faith in setting Europe ablaze through the agency of Special Operations Executive, which had malign consequences that he failed to anticipate. SOE armed some occupied peoples to fight more energetically against one another in 194445 than they had done earlier against the Germans.

It is a common mistake to suppose that those who bestrode the stage during momentous times were giants, set apart from the personalities of our own humdrum society. I have argued in earlier books that we should instead see 193945 as a period when men and women not much different from ourselves strove to grapple with stresses and responsibilities which stretched their powers to the limit. Churchill was one of a tiny number of actors who proved worthy of the role in which destiny cast him. Those who worked for the prime minister, indeed the British people at war, served as a supporting cast, seeking honourably but sometimes inadequately to play their own parts in the wake of a titan.

Sir Edward Bridges, then cabinet secretary, wrote of Churchill between 1940 and 1942: Everything depended upon him

Such strictures seem otiose to those of us convinced that, in his absence, Britain would have made terms with Hitler after Dunkirk. Thereafter, beyond his domestic achievement as war leader, he performed a diplomatic role of which only he was capable: as suitor of the United States on behalf of the British nation. To fulfil this, he was obliged to overcome intense prejudices on both sides of the Atlantic. So extravagant was Churchillsand Rooseveltswartime rhetoric about the Anglo-American alliance that even today the extent of mutual suspicion and indeed dislike between the two peoples is often underestimated. The British ruling class, in particular, condescended amazingly towards Americans.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945»

Look at similar books to Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945»

Discussion, reviews of the book Winstons War: Churchill, 1940-1945 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.