• Complain

Jane Turner Censer - The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895

Here you can read online Jane Turner Censer - The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Baton Rouge, year: 2003, publisher: LSU Press, genre: History / Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    LSU Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2003
  • City:
    Baton Rouge
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This impressively researched book tells the important but little-known story of elite southern white womens successful quest for a measure of self-reliance and independence between antebellum strictures and the restored patriarchy of Jim Crow. Profusely illustrated with the experiences of fascinating women in Virginia and North Carolina, it presents a compelling new chapter in the history of American women and of the South.
As were many ideas, notions of the ideal woman were in flux after the Civil War. While poverty added a harder edge to the search for a good marriage among some southern belles, other privileged white women forged identities that challenged the belle model altogether. Their private and public writings from the 1870s and 1880s suggest a widespread ethic of autonomy. Sometimes that meant increased domestic skills born of the new reality of fewer servants. But women also owned and transmitted property, worked for pay, and even pursued long-term careers. Many found a voice in a plethora of new voluntary organizations, and some southern women attained national celebrity in the literary world, creating strong and capable heroines and mirroring an evolving view toward northern society.
Yet even as elite southern women experimented with their roles, external forces and contradictions within their position were making their unprecedented attitudes and achievements socially untenable. During the 1890s, however, virulent racism and pressures to re-create a mythic South left these women caught between the revived image of the southern belle and the emerging emancipated woman. Just as the memoirs of southern white women have been key to understanding life during the Civil War, the writings of such women unlock the years of dramatic change that followed. Informed by myriad primary documents, Jane Turner Censer immerses us in the world of postwar southern women as they rethought and rebuilt themselves, their families, and their region during a brief but important period of relative freedom.

Jane Turner Censer: author's other books


Who wrote The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Reconstruction of
White Southern Womanhood
18651895
THE RECONSTRUCTION OF
WHITE
SOUTHERN
WOMANHOOD
18651895
JANE TURNER CENSER Copyright 2003 by Louisiana State University Press All - photo 1
JANE TURNER CENSER
Copyright 2003 by Louisiana State University Press All rights reserved - photo 2
Copyright 2003 by Louisiana State University Press
All rights reserved
Manufactured in the United States of America
First printing
cloth
12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03
5 4 3 2 1
paper
12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03
5 4 3 2 1
Designer: Melanie OQuinn Samaha
Typeface: A Garamond, Trajan
Typesetter: Coghill Composition Co., Inc.
Printer and binder: Thomson-Shore, Inc.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data:
Censer, Jane Turner, 1951
The reconstruction of White Southern womanhood, 18651895 / Jane
Turner Censer.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8071-2907-0 (alk. paper) ISBN 0-8071-2921-6 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. WomenSouthern StatesSocial conditions19th century. 2. White womenSouthern StatesHistory19th century. 3. Upper class womenSouthern StatesHistory19th century. 4. Sex roleSouthern StatesHistory19th century. 5. WomenSouthern StatesHistory19th century. 6. Southern StatesHistory1865 I. Title.
HQ1438.S63C45 2003
305.42'0975dc21
2003006660
The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Picture 3
For Jack
CONTENTS
ILLUSTRATIONS
Following page 90
Southern Female Institute, 1870s
Nannie Tunstall
Katherine Waller Barrett
Amlie Rives
Castle Hill
Mary Ellet Cabell
Eliza Lord DeRosset
Frances Christine Fisher
Mary Bayard Devereux Clarke
Julia Magruder
M. G. McClelland
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
T his is not the book I intended to write. Female writers and schoolteachers played no part in my thinking when I considered pursuing the postwar experiences of planter families. Yet as I delved deeper into my research, the women of the old elite grabbed my attention and would not let go. Not only were they an especially vital and fascinating part of the story, but I became convinced that they were an important part of the late nineteenth-century South. In that way, schoolteachers, authors, and their stay-at-home sisters forced their way into my consciousness and eventually hijacked my project. And in some ways perhaps it was only fitting that I should make this exploration, for the southern female schoolteachers who followed the pioneering generation that I chronicle here played a vital part in my family and even in my own career. My beloved aunt, the late Elizabeth Turner, passed on a legacy that she received from my great-aunt, Ethel Hays, both of them former schoolteachers, to help me begin my graduate studies in history. I am grateful to both of them. I also fondly remember other schoolteachers in the familymy aunt, Mabel Turner Smith, and my grandmother, Flora Phelps Embry. My sister-in-law, Rhonda Cole Turner, continues this commendable tradition.
I owe thanks to many, many people and institutions for various kinds of assistance with this project. Fellowships from the National Humanities Center and the American Council of Learned Societies funded the research into southern planter families that began this project. A Mellon Research Stipend from the Virginia Historical Society supported research in their rich collections. A Fellowship for College Teachers from the National Endowment for the Humanities allowed me time to complete a draft of the entire manuscript. My home institution, George Mason University, has supported this undertaking in a multitude of ways: course reductions, research assistance, a summer stipend, and study leaves. I am also grateful to the History and Art History department for underwriting the purchase of and permissions for illustrations for this book.
My researches have been made enormously easier by the knowledgeable and helpful staffs I encountered at the Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; the Virginia Historical Society; the Special Collections Department, University of Virginia Library; the Library of Virginia; the Duke University Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library; the Library of Congress, the North Carolina Division of Archives and History; and the Fauquier County Circuit Courts Hall of Records. I owe special thanks to Frances Pollard at the Virginia Historical Society and to Sandra Gioia Treadway, Sara Bearss, and John Kneebone at the Library of Virginia. Brent Tarter at the Library of Virginia has helped me with more research problems than either he or I care to recall. I was very fortunate to have George Oberle as a research assistant; his careful combing of the records and his superb bibliographical skills greatly enriched my study. For lodging and great companionship on research trips I am grateful to John and Cheryl Lang in Raleigh, North Carolina, and my cousins, Jane and Paul Kingston, in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Many friends have assisted this project over the years. My colleagues at George Mason University have been a constant source of good cheer and encouragement. In particular, Michael OMalley, Roy Rosenzweig, Jeffrey C. Stewart, and Rosemarie Zagarri read parts of this work and offered invaluable suggestions. When I presented papers on this research at the History Graduate Colloquium at George Mason, the Washington Seminar on American History and Culture, and the annual meeting of the Organization of American Historians, I received numerous helpful criticisms and suggestions. Anne Firor Scott and Joel Williamson have been steadfast supporters; I have enjoyed my discussions with them and I appreciate the many ways in which they have aided this project. Vernon and Georgeanne Burton, John Inscoe, John David Smith, James C. Turner, David Schuyler, Elizabeth Varon, and LeeAnn Whites have all read and commented on various versions of this research. I am particularly indebted to J. William Harris for his careful annotation of the entire manuscript. Bill rescued me from numerous missteps and an enormous number of infelicities; he also gave me new ideas about how the parts could all fit together.
As I have been turning my manuscript into a book, I have relied on many people. Stephanie Jacobe at the Virginia Historical Society helped me find images in their large collection. At the University of Virginia, Michael F. Plunkett, Margaret D. Hrabe, and Rey A. Antonio all were extremely helpful. Audrey C. Johnson of the Library of Virginia was indefatigable in helping me obtain pictures of female writers. I would like to acknowledge the permission of Southern Cultures and the North Carolina Historical Review to use materials from articles published in them. I also am grateful to Anne Carter at the North Carolina Historical Review for allowing me to use illustrations that appeared with my article. I appreciate the enthusiasm with which Maureen Hewitt and Sylvia Frank Rodrigue have promoted this book. As my editor, George Roupe has patiently helped me manage a million details. I am also grateful to Alisa Plant for saving my prose from its worst excesses while allowing me to tell this story my way.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895»

Look at similar books to The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Reconstruction of White Southern Womanhood, 1865–1895 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.