• Complain

Carlton F. W. Larson - On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law

Here you can read online Carlton F. W. Larson - On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: HarperCollins, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Carlton F. W. Larson On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law
  • Book:
    On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HarperCollins
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A concise, accessible, and engaging guide to the law of treason, written by the nations foremost expert on the subject
The only crime defined in the United States Constitution, treason is routinely described by judges as more heinous than murder. Today the term is regularly thrown around by lawmakers and pundits on both sides of the aisle. But as these heated accusations flood the news cycle, its not always clear what the crime of treason truly is, or when it should be prosecuted.


Drawing on over two decades of research, constitutional law and legal history scholar Carlton Larson takes us on a grand tour of the Treason Clause of the United States Constitution. Despite the Clauses apparent simplicity, Larson demonstrates that it is a form of constitutional quicksand in which seemingly obvious intuitions are often far off the mark. From the floors of the medieval British Parliament that codified the Statute of Treasons upon which the American law was based to the treason of Benedict Arnold, our nations founding traitor, to more recent events, including WWIIs Tokyo Rose and the allegations against Edward Snowden and Donald Trump, Larson provides a riveting account of treason law in action.

On Treason is an indispensable guide for anyone who wants to understand this fundamental aspect of our legal system. With this short, accessible look at the laws history and meaning, Larson clarifies who is actually guiltyand readers wont need a law degree to understand why.

Carlton F. W. Larson: author's other books


Who wrote On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

To Elaine, Carina, and Elliot

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

United States Constitution, Article III, Section 3

Contents

Another story has just brokena plea for Russia to hack someones e-mails, a meeting at the Trump Tower with a suspected Russian agent, or an announcement by the president of the United States that a hated political enemy has committed treason. In my office at the UC Davis School of Law in California, I know what will come next. The phone rings, and suddenly I am back in the world of Washington, where I used to practice law. On the line is a reporter with the inevitable question: Is it really treason?

As recently as early 2016, I rarely received calls like this. As a professor of American constitutional law and legal history, I regularly answer questions for the media about legal issues. But for the most part, those calls tended to focus on constitutional law more generally and on other subjects I have written about, such as the Second Amendment or the arcane law governing baby names. Few people were interested in one of my primary fields of researchthe American law of treason.

Times have changedand dramatically so. Treason, for lack of a better word, is now hot again. Ever since Donald Trump publicly encouraged Russia to hack the DNCs e-mails, allegations of treason have hovered over Trump and his campaign, pushing the issue into a bright national spotlight. With each new sordid revelation, the stench of perceived disloyalty grows stronger. For many on the left, the notion that Donald Trump is a traitor isnt just a suspicion, its an established fact.

Trump, too, is convinced that widespread treason is occurring, although he sees different culprits. By June 2019, he had made at least twenty-four separate accusations of treason, far more than any other modern president.

But its not just Trump. If you look carefully, you can find accusations of treason everywhere; nearly every prominent politician has been accused of treason at some point, often in hysterical and breathless prose. From some of the less reputable corners of the internet, we learn, JUST IN: Chuck Schumer Just Got The WORST NEWS EVER!Treason Charges Probable...

W hat are we to make of this profusion of treason claims? Some of them are mere rhetorical hyperbole, a generic term for some perceived disloyalty. In casual conversation, for example, one might use the term traitor to describe a cheating spouse or a business partner hired away by a competitor. No one would interpret such a claim as referring to criminal activity.

Treason, however, also has a distinct legal meaning. Each nation defines treason differently, but the core concept is betrayal of ones country. In England and America, the law historically viewed treason as the most horrific crime a person could commit. Judges routinely described it as worse than murder, and the sentences imposed for treason bore this out. Whereas murderers were merely hanged, convicted traitors in England received a far more brutal and elaborate punishment. The culprit was drawn to the gallows behind a cart, and then partially hanged by the neck. While he was still alive, his entrails were taken out and burned in front of him, his genitals were cut off, and, finally, he was decapitated. His body was sliced into four pieces, which were then placed on stakes alongside the head in highly visible locations. It was believed, probably correctly, that this procedure would have a significant deterrent effect on all who witnessed it.

Many of the current allegations about treason, though, are not merely rhetoric, but sincere (although often incorrect) assertions that a person has committed a criminal offense. Such claims are made to encourage a prosecution, possibly leading to an execution or at least to a lengthy sentence of imprisonment. These allegations should not be tossed around lightly. To accuse someone of treason is to accuse him or her of the most significant offense known to American law.

But what exactly is treason? The answer would appear to be simplethe crime is specifically defined in the Treason Clause of Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which states, Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. The language is clear and seemingly nontechnical. Why would a reporter, or anyone else, need to turn to an expert?

In reality, the Treason Clause turns out to be constitutional quicksand. In a 1945 decision, the United States Supreme Court warned that the Treason Clauses superficial appearance of clarity and simplicity... proves illusory when it is put to practical application. There are few subjects on which the temptation to utter abstract interpretive generalizations is greater or on which they are more to be distrusted. The little clause is packed with controversy and difficulty.

Supreme Court justices are not usually so candid about the difficulty of their cases. But controversy and difficulty is an entirely appropriate summary of American treason law, a field in which seemingly obvious intuitions are often wildly off the mark. The body of law surrounding treason is complex, contested, and often rooted in even more obscure strands of English law. As a result, there is usually no simple answer available on the internet or anywhere else.

Controversy, difficulty, and complexity, however, are not desirable qualities in a nations criminal law, which is supposed to provide clear notice as to what conduct is prohibited and what is not. The allegations about Donald Trump have greatly increased public curiosity about treason, but it is more difficult than it should be for interested citizens to find reliable information about the offense. Increasingly shrill accusations of treason on all sides of the political spectrum have done little to advance public understanding; indeed, they tend to muddy the issue far more than to clarify it. What is needed is a reliable overview of the American law of treason that everyone can understand.

On Treason has two broad goals. First, this book seeks to explain, in language clearly intelligible to nonlawyers, the core principles of American treason law, including many areas that are not widely understood. My intent is to arm the reader with the tools to identify what counts as treason and what does not in the vast majority of cases. Sometimes the question can be genuinely hard, because there are issues that havent been squarely resolved by courts, or because modern developments have challenged the factual assumptions underlying certain doctrines. In these cases, I have tried to lay out the arguments on both sides, recognizing that courts might resolve the issue either way. The

Second, the book relates the stories of significant treason cases in American history. Although treason trials are now a rarity, they have played an important role in our countrys development. Our very existence as an independent nation was formed in an act of treason against Great Britain. Our greatest national crisis, the Civil War, was triggered by the decision of Southern states to traitorously wage war against the United States. The stories of Benedict Arnold, Aaron Burr, Jefferson Davis, and others are fascinating, not just because of their colorful details, but because they illuminate fundamental aspects of our national identity.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law»

Look at similar books to On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law»

Discussion, reviews of the book On Treason: A Citizens Guide to the Law and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.